Jump to content
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
ishankov

U.S.S.R "Paper ships"

26 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Members
19 posts

I was wondering if there will be all the soviet and russian drawn or not produced types of ships.

i know that not many ships were made. :Smile_unsure:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,275
Alpha Tester
5,710 posts
2,411 battles

There are going to be paper ships from most countries i think, Even the US is getting the Montana class and Germany getting the H-41 (maybe the H-42)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
615
[POW1]
Members
5,078 posts

View PostCrag_r, on 03 February 2013 - 12:06 AM, said:

There are going to be paper ships from most countries i think, Even the US is getting the Montana class and Germany getting the H-41 (maybe the H-42)

View PostCrag_r, on 03 February 2013 - 12:06 AM, said:

There are going to be paper ships from most countries i think, Even the US is getting the Montana class and Germany getting the H-41 (maybe the H-42)
But the Montana Keel was laid down with sister ships. But where later cancel and cut up for other war projects.
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
380 posts
322 battles

They should make all the H-Class ships,from the H-30's to the H-44,not just the H-42.Unless the H-44 is too big  :Smile_trollface: .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
1,376 posts
1,224 battles

Posted Image

 

While not a fan of Russian ships, i hope they include the Stalingrad-Class. Handsome vessels on par with the Alaska Class. I like the dual secondary mounts over the forward main battery.

9x 12in Guns

12x 5.1in guns

Mulitple AA guns.

Edited by Jracule
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
177 posts
10,923 battles

View PostJracule, on 03 March 2013 - 02:21 AM, said:

Posted Image

While not a fan of Russian ships, i hope they include the Stalingrad-Class. Handsome vessels on par with the Alaska Class. I like the dual secondary mounts over the forward main battery.
9x 12in Guns
12x 5.1in guns
Mulitple AA guns.

thats a russian battleship?  Makes me wonder how tough its hull armor on that design

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest Ainen
Guest
0 posts

View PostMaxHD2490, on 16 April 2013 - 12:38 AM, said:

thats a russian battleship?  Makes me wonder how tough its hull armor on that design
Prject 82 - heavy cruiser in Soviet classification. In size it's as big as treaty BB,though...
Funny fact - Stalingrad is direct ancestor of project 83, i.e. - adm. Hipper in soviet designation system(and, logically, cruiser pr.66 - see below).
Some other ships of same program:


KqhK14DWeog.jpg
Project 24 battleship
Project 82 "heavy cruiser"
Project 66 cruiser
Project 65 light cruiser

1948_Soviet_shipbuilding.jpg

Edited by Ainen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,238
Alpha Tester
4,440 posts

Quote from KGB:

 

To clarify things:

Tier9 USSR BB Project 23 has variable main belt from 375 to 420mm main belt, 28 knots, 6x2 152mm secondary guns and 6x2 100mm AA guns.

Tier10 USSR BB Project 24 has variable from 410 to 450mm main belt, 30 knots, 8x2 130mm (6 of them can fire at one target) rapid firing dual purpose guns, 12x4 45mm autoguns (AAW - the 40mm Bofors analogue),  good electronics, better bulges.

 

http://forum.worldof...ge__st__100#top

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,238
Alpha Tester
4,440 posts

View PostKoln, on 27 August 2013 - 09:03 AM, said:

[Content removed.]
Social/Religious/Political.
Warning issued.
~GM/Mod Teams
Where are "-1s" when you need them...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
14,008 posts
5,814 battles

View PostAriecho, on 27 August 2013 - 01:03 PM, said:

Where are "-1s" when you need them...
probably being used on other people.

There's always the report button you know, since that post does technically break a few rules.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
661
Alpha Tester
1,275 posts
241 battles

View PostAriecho, on 06 September 2013 - 03:26 PM, said:

Nah, the guy is cruising for attention.  Won't give him that reward.

What we need is the internet equivalent of a roach motel.

Trolls go in, but never come out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,209
[SALT]
Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
3,679 posts
4,052 battles

View PostKoln, on 27 August 2013 - 09:03 AM, said:

[Content removed.]
Social/Religious/Political.
Warning issued.
~GM/Mod Teams
Generally as Ari would tell me, don't bite the bait....too late!
Russian bias eh? Funny, since I can name quite a few German vehicles that dominate in their own tier. Lets see....Pz IV, 3601H, King Tiger, E75, Stug III, Ferdinand, Marder II, Hetzer, and I could keep going.
Now as for the British, that's partial because of their development of Infantry tanks and cruiser tanks, the problem is, the game's mechanics better support fast moving hard hitters, or more mobile tanks. Which is why a certain tiers, the British feel a bit of a let down due to their high pen, great guns, that have low damage meaning they have to be careful how they use them. That doesn't mean they don't have good tanks. The Cromwell is one of the best tier 6 mediums, the Conqueror is an amazing tier 9 heavy when fully upgraded and used by a good player. Overall the British tree is very balanced, the issue is they feel like a jack of all trades branch until late tiers. No bias, just how they were built. Although I do have to say I am still surprised they haven't given the British a damn Firefly yet.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×