Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
wiztaxi

Subs...make weps carrier only

15 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

74
[FLOTR]
Members
180 posts

Wouldn't it be ironic\funny\devilish to make sub torps only work against CVs  

Like Deepwater II powa. 

And make CV planes only work against subs /smirk 

Not really trying that hard to marginalize either class.... really. 

  • Boring 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,388
Members
1,058 posts
7,478 battles
4 minutes ago, wiztaxi said:

Wouldn't it be ironic\funny\devilish to make sub torps only work against CVs  

Like Deepwater II powa. 

And make CV planes only work against subs /smirk 

Not really trying that hard to marginalize either class.... really. 

I think it would be much more logical to revert the nerf to flooding, make all DD torps into BB+CV DWT, and buff their characteristics to match the target restrictions (i.e. Damage, Speed, range, and detectability). BBs and CVs lack a valid counter. DDs also suffer from lacking effectiveness at countering a non-DD. This partially solves both issues.

Edited by Varknyn12
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
74
[FLOTR]
Members
180 posts
33 minutes ago, paradat said:

No Thank You GIF

Because having a platform never designed for or actually engaged in a close-in tactical engagement profile acting in a close-in tactical engagement is so much more realistic right? 

Why dont we just have flying saucers too?

Edited by wiztaxi
Tis fun...
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,430
[WOLF1]
Beta Testers
12,323 posts
17,497 battles
Just now, wiztaxi said:

Because having a platform never designed for or actually engaged in a close-in tactical engagement profile acting in a close-in tactical engagement is so much more realistic right? 

Nearly all sub engagements are closer than BB engagements and way closer that CV engagements right? Subs are very tactical close in engagements platforms, or was your post referring to the CV's?

Plus this is a game, I am really looking forward to the added ship type. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,752
[CMFRT]
[CMFRT]
Banned
16,985 posts

Submarines are a bad idea in WOWS, they don't fit the real-world or gameplay context of the battles in WOWS.

The "submarines" that are being developed for WOWS are an even worse idea, a carton caricature that will fail to appeal to submarine enthusiasts while also making the game miserable for everyone else.

And the idea that they're going to be some sort of revenge/punishment against CVs is a delusional fever dream promoted by players blinded by irrational hatred of CVs. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,430
[WOLF1]
Beta Testers
12,323 posts
17,497 battles
13 minutes ago, KilljoyCutter said:

And the idea that they're going to be some sort of revenge/punishment against CVs is a delusional fever dream promoted by players blinded by irrational hatred of CVs. 

Agreed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,430
[WOLF1]
Beta Testers
12,323 posts
17,497 battles
1 minute ago, Vekta408 said:

his idea sounds good to me

Of course it does lol. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
392
[-N-]
Alpha Tester
823 posts
34 minutes ago, wiztaxi said:

Because having a platform never designed for or actually engaged in a close-in tactical engagement profile acting in a close-in tactical engagement is so much more realistic right? 

Why dont we just have flying saucers too?

You do realize that BB's weren't meant for close range engagements, that their secondaries were there to ward off anything getting close mid range to short range.  There are no parts of this game that truly are perfect as a realistic representation. 

CV's do have counters just like any other class.  You just seem reluctant to state the it's the planes the CV uses that is it's sole damage ability.  The CV itself is just a floating target that moves.

By your standards in this we could easily say that all ships play submerged and we turn this into an underwater battle game....that actually sounds fun lol.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
392
[-N-]
Alpha Tester
823 posts
24 minutes ago, KilljoyCutter said:

Submarines are a bad idea in WOWS, they don't fit the real-world or gameplay context of the battles in WOWS.

The "submarines" that are being developed for WOWS are an even worse idea, a carton caricature that will fail to appeal to submarine enthusiasts while also making the game miserable for everyone else.

And the idea that they're going to be some sort of revenge/punishment against CVs is a delusional fever dream promoted by players blinded by irrational hatred of CVs. 

 

Nicely stated,  we tried to convince the dev team in alpha that PT boats would fit better then subs ever would.  Which is when we were promised by the team that there would never ever be subs....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,480 posts
10,355 battles
16 minutes ago, paradat said:

Of course it does lol. 

It makes perfect sense. Then those players can play their own game like they are now...only the rest of us won't have to be randomly thrown into it at the same time.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,430
[WOLF1]
Beta Testers
12,323 posts
17,497 battles
12 minutes ago, Vekta408 said:

It makes perfect sense. Then those players can play their own game like they are now...only the rest of us won't have to be randomly thrown into it at the same time.

LOL 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
60 posts
3,397 battles
2 hours ago, wiztaxi said:

Because having a platform never designed for or actually engaged in a close-in tactical engagement profile acting in a close-in tactical engagement is so much more realistic right? 

Why dont we just have flying saucers too?

 

DD's make kamikaze torp runs on BB's in game all the time...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
904
[PIG]
[PIG]
Members
1,310 posts
6,417 battles
6 hours ago, wiztaxi said:

Wouldn't it be ironic\funny\devilish to make sub torps only work against CVs  

Like Deepwater II powa. 

And make CV planes only work against subs /smirk 

Not really trying that hard to marginalize either class.... really. 

Not sure. But I'm sure that your game style fits to T0.

TO or Tnull is coming soon. Only BBs and CAs, no planes, no DDs, no torps, no gimmicks!!!! Guns, more and more guns, shells and... Guns !!!

Meanwhile, TI an TII.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×