52,537 [MAUS] LittleWhiteMouse Members 13,795 posts Report post #1 Posted December 27, 2019 (edited) Hullo, everyone! Welcome to Lert's and Mouse's end-of-year festivities! We've got a lot to say and some goodies to giveaway too, so make sure you read through to the end of the article for those details. We're going to be going over the premium and reward ships that we felt were most memorable in 2019 and why they made our list. These aren't necessarily the best and worst that 2019 had to offer, simply those that stick out in our minds and are likely to be well remembered (or loathed) in the future. Let's begin things with the unfortunate elephant in the room: 2019: The Year that Tried to Murder Fun Oof. 2019 is almost over, and I'm glad for it. This was one tough year for World of Warships, for the game itself, for the developers and for the players. The CV rework went live and was met with - mixed opinions, to use an understatement the size of US WWII industrial base. The Research bureau was announced to great dissatisfaction from the playerbase, and with good reason - the original implementation was just sheer pay to win. The current implementation is better, but still far from ideal. Then there was the announcement of subs with initial rounds of testing, the introduction of Smolensk, the announcement of the Ikea flat-pack destroyer line with their meatball torpeedus, and the Puerto Rico debacle. To say this year was one of controversies is, again, an understatement of biblical proportions. What will 2020 look like? One can only hope for less controversy this time around. Me, I'm trying to guard myself against the fatigue that's been slowly creeping in. A sense of enjoyment I once felt while playing this game now takes more effort than ever to find. I've scaled back my play and my forum presence, as some may have noticed. It's not an exaggeration to say that if not for Mouse, I might not even be still playing this game. Hours we've spent discussing the controversies, sciencing new mechanics, new premium ships, puns I've inflicted upon her and just general good times is why I'm still here. Is it over yet? In hindsight, I should have taken the year off. I certainly could have used it for personal reasons. More universally, this was not a good year for the community as a whole. The enjoyment of the game was severely compromised by the drawn out carrier rework. It took eight months for the systems for the CV rework to stabilize and there are still balance issues to be addressed even now, a full eleven months after it launched. Add on the additional calamities of the Research Academy-Bureau-thingie and the whole end-of-year Puerto Rico debacle and 2019 deserves to burn in a Colbert-Smolensk spammed fire. To say nothing of my health issues, this was a really difficult year for me. I don't stomach excessive negativity well. I look to my hobbies for enjoyment, not a constant [edited]-fest. Still, there were a lot of valid complaints and criticisms over the year and they needed to be aired and relayed. You would think that with serious problems that exaggeration and vitriol would ebb, laser-focused on solving issues that actually needed addressing. Sadly, misinformation and rhetoric spiked over the course 2019. The Community Contributor program in particular has become a polarized mess of condescending backhand talk and ridicule. Getting review work done has never been more of a challenge than it was in 2019. I am so very, very glad the year is over. It hasn't all been doom and gloom, though. Despite the challenges coming in from all sides, the support of my friends and readers has been most welcome. Furthermore, there was some really fun ship additions to World of Warships. I personally feel that the latest King of the Sea tournament was the best one yet to spectate, for example. It gives me high hopes for the popularity of the competitive scene in the future. And lastly, despite all of the chaos, despite the constant overhauls to mechanics, I did manage to keep abreast of all of the changes and I came out the other side with a solid understanding of the CV-mechanics. So help me, I even found some enjoyment in all of the mess. If nothing else deserves a gold-star, that certainly does. I hope, like me, you did find some measure of amusement out of all of the 2019 chaos. Furthermore, I hope you've had a wonderful and safe holiday season, Bataan Death Marches for Puerto Rico aside. Let's hope 2020 doesn't similarly try and kill us all. The Contenders Top Row: Irian, Wichita, Alaska, Exeter, Azuma, Lazo, Neustrashimy, AL MontpelierSecond Row: AL Yukikaze, Lenin, Georgia, Hill, Benham, Yoshino, Siroco, BayardThird Row: Colbert, Somers, Smolensk, Friesland, Yudachi, Thunderer, Ohio, Ark RoyalFourth Row: Yahagi, Viribus Unitis, Genova, Sims B, Scharnhorst B, Graf Zeppelin B, Alaska B, PoltavaBottom Row: Gorizia, Puerto Rico 2019 saw the most premium and reward ships released yet to World of Warships, that's even if you dismiss the four cloned Black Friday vessels. It was one Hell of a busy year. On top of 34 premiums listed above, we had another 31 tech tree ships added between the tech trees for the Russian battleships, British Carriers, French destroyers and Italian cruisers. Add onto this the aircraft carrier rework and it's a wonder that everything isn't on fire. Colbert. Smolensk. We're watching you. Let's get into Lert's and my picks for the most memorable of this crop. The Hatred Award Smolensk has sparked a lot of hatred on the forum, for a ship that is in my opinion not nearly as overpowered as people make it out to be. Sure it's strong in its niche, very strong even, but it's also easily deleted. Especially if you know where it is and can plan your salvo and select the appropriate shell. It's only in the hands of the very best players that she elevates to a nearly untouchable state, and even then one mistake, one lucky salvo, and it's all over. All the hatred and vitriol leveled at Smolensk wouldn't be nearly as abundant if it had been an American ship. Is she good for the game? Debatable. The HE spam meta has been the source of lament on the forums for a long time now. Is she strong? No doubt. But overpowered to such a point that she's earned the hatred she's getting? Personally I believe that has more to do with the flag she's wearing than anything she's capable of. The Most-Balans Award It's a wonder how Benham managed not only to slip into the game as-is, but also ended up being a giveaway ship. I'm used to such things being hamstrung at the eleventh hour of development, not kept as competitive monsters. Smolensk may get all of the press for being bad for the game, but Benham deserves no less hate. Worse, I think Benham will end up having longer legs than Smolensk precisely because the Soviet ship gets all of the attention. It was a difficult choice to not include Benham in my list, but between Puerto Rico taking the spot for nightmare grinds and torpedo spamming destroyers not being that novel, she's a runner up for me. The Illegal-Fun Award I have invested way too many hours into aircraft carriers this year. It was a chance for me to keep ahead of the curve. Even with my health issues, I made the time to understand appreciate all that was happening. As a consequence, I actually started enjoying some of the time I spent in them. The culmination of this is my love for Ark Royal's game-play. Whenever I want to blow off steam, I take her out -- as often into Scenarios as Random Battles. The balance of tier VI carriers is much better than the other tiers and Ark Royal is in a particular sweet spot with some pretty hefty weaknesses. I feel less guilty in that regard, even if there are more than a few delicious baby seals being clubbed. Still, those cute little destroyers aren't going to hug themselves and Ark Royal is just the ship to do it. The "Sky-is-Falling" Award Alaska's development saw one relatively sizable nerf that instantly had the forum in an uproar. That one nerf had instantly made her completely useless. This was evidence of Russian bias, that Kronshtadt was allowed to exist the way she was but Alaska had to be nerfed. Evidence that the devs hated the USN. The ship was ruined forever, cried all the forum-warriors who'd never driven her, who'd at most seen one in battle driven by a tester. But often not even that. And then she was released, and all the whining stopped. She was released and proved herself a solid, reliable performer. And now if anyone asks about the best T9 ships, Alaska is often one of the first mentioned. She's commonplace in matches, and has, on the whole, a good reputation. Where are all the people who said she was a useless piece of crap now? Where's all the whining? It's funny how well Alaska's development worked out. She's an incredibly safe investment, I find, and she joins the ranks of other safe and worthwhile investments from 2019. This list includes (for me) ships like Irian, Lenin, Georgia and Friesland. The Disappointment Award Exeter was tested at Tier VI, until WG in their eternal wisdom mucked with her soft stats and downtiered her to tier V. Normally I don't mind retiering of test ships if it's warranted and an argument could be made that for Exeter it was, but I'm not convinced. With massaged soft stats and some consumable muckery I still believe she could've been a wonderful little tier VI heavy cruiser. Now don't get me wrong, Exeter at tier V performs very well and is actually quite powerful. I have no problems with how she feels or plays at tier. But personally I would've loved to see her slightly buffed and put at tier VI, where she can div alongside historically related ships like the Leander class and Graf Spee. Missed opportunity I'd say. As an avowed teaboo you would think that I too would similarly lament Exeter's treatment. However, I really have to give this prize to Gorizia. The potential of this ship, and indeed the Italian cruiser line as a whole is just one big sad-trombone moment. Gorizia earns a double helping here of not only struggling with the woes of the rest of the Italian cruiser line, but while simultaneously being slapped in as the forgotten runner-up prize for one of the worst mismanaged events in the game's history. The Zara-class as a whole had the potential for being amazing powerhouses in World of Warships. Now, they're simply forgettable. Like Exeter, they're a victim of being shoved into a tier where they didn't really belong. The "Be Careful What You Wish For" Award The codes in this gif aren't valid. They expired back in like ... mid 2018. Thunderer was made up by Mouse as a joke, as snide commentary on how WG seemed to design their premiums at that time. She was designed to incorporate all the un-fun choices WG could make, designed to be terrible. And then WG made her real. Fortunately not to Mouse's un-fun specifications, thank Odin. The resulting ship is at least enjoyable and seemingly pretty well balanced with weaker survivability in exchange for superbly comfortable gunnery compared to Conqueror. For the record, the Thunderer I've been bugging Wargaming about for the last year and a half was the Orion-class (tier IV) battleship. But what did I get instead? Well, they took the joke from my 100th review and seemed to have married it to the proposal I made for Prince of Wales -- namely a super-accurate battleship that was squishy as all get out. I wish I could take credit for what Thunderer became but I admit to being blindsided and rather unhelpful with her development. Hell, I HATED this thing for a while until I remembered that I had asked for something similar and reminded myself how that particular ship needed to be played. The irony here is that Thunderer, for starting out as such an unnecessary and unwanted abomination, has ended up being probably one of the most pleasant premiums of 2019. She has obvious strengths and obvious weaknesses. She rewards good decisions and punishes poor play in a far more fair manner than a lot of the other ships from this year. I'm sincerely flattered to have my name tied to something so well done, even if I did little but name the darn thing. The "You Knew It Was On Our List" Award Puerto Rico. What more can be said about this ship? I'm sure Wargaming would love nothing more than to move ahead and leave the mess of her introduction behind. She was presented as the fun holiday grind for 2019, until the actual requirements came out and it became clear that she was intented only for the top .5% of nolifers, and people with fat wallets. All for a ship that's decidedly mediocre in actual performance. Now don't get me wrong, despite my initial rant about the ship I don't mind no-lifer / whale only grinds. I don't mind content gated for people who put in effort beyond what I am reasonable capable of putting in. There are ships I know I'll never have, and I'm at peace with that. Just call it what it is, and don't present it as the fun holiday grind event. All WG had to do was introduce the event with things like "Are you man enough for Puerto Rico?" and "Only those who prove themselves over the holiday season will have Puerto Rico!" and I would've had a lot more truck with it. The PR disaster was a PR disaster. I dunno that Puerto Rico will be much remembered going forward. Her event is definitely more memorable than the ship herself, and the public relations disasters are more memorable still. Puerto Rico is a competent, soft-upgrade to Alaska but tier for tier, she's nowhere near the success story of her predecessor. Oh she'll be remembered alright. She'll forever carry the stigma of being that mediocre ship with the dumpster-fire introduction. The Premium of the Year Award I'm sure it'll come as no surprise that my premium ship of the year is Friesland. But, it's not for the reason you might think. While I'm delighted that we finally have a proper Dutch ship in the game, I truly believe she's a candidate for premium ship of the year on her own merit. She's unique, offering a playstyle not yet seen in the game. She's fun to play. Despite her HE spamming playstyle there've been hardly any complaints from people playing against her. She has weaknesses keeping her in line despite distinct strengths, and she fills a niche. Plus she's very pretty, which also helps. If only she'd been historically more significant. But we can't have all, can we. Still though, she ticks all the boxes of a good premium ship, and now they've announced a Pan Ikea flat pack destroyer line, she'll have a use as a high tier captain trainer too. All in all I'm more than pleased how well received the first Dutch ship has been. On to the next one! 1047 maybe? An Admiralen? 1913? O-16? Time will tell. If you're wondering why I didn't chime in on Lert's commentary on Smolensk, here's why. More than any other ship released in 2019, I think she defines this year. Forget aircraft carriers, forget Puerto Rico, forget the Research Academy; 2019 is the year of Smolensk. She's powerful, easy to play, controversial as all get out and prevalent. This ship is everywhere. As much as I loathe the damn thing, I have to admit that she's popular and with good reason. She's easily one of the safest investments for your ship collection at the moment. Even the looming threat of multiple nerfs doesn't lessen the luster around her. It took a poop-tornado the size of Puerto Rico's release to mute the daily hate-commentary on Smolensk. It bothers me that I can't give this award to a ship I like. I was happy to award this to ships like Scharnhorst (2016), Giulio Cesare (2017), and Massachusetts (2018) (battleship bias much, Mouse?) but Smolensk earned it fair and square in 2019. Conclusions 2019 is over, and not a moment too soon. It's been a year of some ups and many downs, and we've still got the introduction of submarines to look forward to. Or to dread. Current test iterations give me reason to doubt they'll be well received or a positive addition to the game. Maybe 2020 is the year I finally stop playing. But probably not. Thank you all for reading my ramblings and engaging in discussions. It's been a memorable year. Let's hope the next will be forgettable. I've had enough of 'interesting times', thankyouverymuch. Though the aircraft carrier rework loomed large in my concerns at the end of 2018, I had more pressing concerns with the proliferation of tier IX+ premiums being added to the game. At the time, Jean Bart was the only tier IX premium that had been sold. There had been others, like Kronshtadt, Musashi, Missouri and Black, but these were all reward vessels -- sold indirectly rather than being slapped front and center on the premium shop. Currently there are five tier IX ships being sold directly for cash. And now Puerto Rico is the first tier X premium sold for doubloons. I do not doubt that in 2020, we'll see more of the same. It's possible even that ships like Thunderer may similarly move over towards a for-cash value, so long as Wargaming is happy with their current state of balance. Is it funny I worry more about this than submarines for 2020? Submarines are way down on my list of concerns. I've still got it in my head that more changes may be coming to aircraft carriers in the future. It still feels surreal that the rework is "finished" but for some balance adjustments for individual ships. I guess I'm not ready to put that calamity down and worry about new things when I don't feel the old has yet been addressed to my satisfaction. 2019 was one weird year for a number of reasons. Thank you all for reading and good luck in the give-away, and a happy new year! The Contest! But, let's end things on a positive. I have stuff to give away and this is open to everyone, regardless of region. Here's what's up for grabs: TOP PRIZE: Gorizia, the tier VII Premium Italian Heavy Cruiser provided to me by Wargaming. RUNNERS UP: Code Combo (Christmas Container Code + Community Contributor Camouflage Code) I will be giving out ONE (1) Gorizia and TEN (10) Code Combos. Here's what you need to do to enter: Include your USERNAME you want the prize awarded to. Include the REGION in which play. Tell me what your most-memorable premium or reward ship released in 2019 was and why. The list of all 34 ships is up at the top of the article if you missed it. These submissions may be made in the following places: Here in answer to this article North American World of Warships forums. Reddit on the thread I created linking back to ShipComrade. My Patreon page where I linked back to ShipComrade. The copy of this article on the ShipComrade. Reward submissions must be entered before 17:00 UTC on December 30th. Winners will be chose at random from eligible entries. I reserve the right to disqualify people for being total puds. So don't be a pud. I will publish the winners with my Puerto Rico review. Thank you all for reading. Have a GREAT and wonderful holiday and a safe New Year's. Good luck to those sorry few still grinding for Puerto Rico. My heart goes out to you. Edited December 28, 2019 by LittleWhiteMouse 56 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
39,480 [HINON] Lert Alpha Tester 27,851 posts 27,293 battles Report post #2 Posted December 27, 2019 1 7 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,563 RyuuohD_NA Members 2,948 posts 94 battles Report post #3 Posted December 27, 2019 Good Job LWM and Lert!! Belated Merry Christmas and Advanced Happy New Year!! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
8,216 [SOUP] Chobittsu Members 9,426 posts Report post #4 Posted December 27, 2019 Time for a party~ 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4,827 [HINON] tcbaker777 [HINON] Members 9,951 posts 19,166 battles Report post #5 Posted December 27, 2019 you know what the sad thing is? if WG decides to make the Dockyard a thing they do every so often, the memory of the PR will ALWAYS come back up with it, and people probably wont be excited for it because theyll, rightfully, just expect it to be another impossible grind 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,215 [HE] DolphinPrincess Members 1,182 posts 9,688 battles Report post #6 Posted December 27, 2019 (edited) 28 minutes ago, LittleWhiteMouse said: All the hatred and vitriol leveled at Smolensk wouldn't be nearly as abundant if it had been an American ship. 28 minutes ago, LittleWhiteMouse said: Personally I believe that has more to do with the flag she's wearing than anything she's capable of. Lert couldn't have worded that any better. If Worcester was flying a Russian Flag and Smolensk an American flag, people would claim the Worcester Overpowered and Smolensk Balanced. Better yet, if they both flew a neutral flag, people would actually be able to quickly compare the two ships and realize that Worcester is just a better Smolensk. That said, as for the giveaway: DolphinPrincess on NA Smolensk is indeed my most memorable premium of 2019, well, of course I am very biased in the matter because Smolensk was the ship I used alongside a trusty Somers and my clanmates of O7 to win King of the Seas. But what made it really memorable was that I knew Smolensk was a ship of extremes, much like Stalingrad, and to use her properly in preparation of the tournament a lot of time was invested into figuring out just what the ship is capable of. Here are some examples: We tested Smolensk vs Des Moines, and found that Smolensk can be citadeled easily at any engagement range by Des Moines if it ever tries to use more than 2 turrets. Therefore, even if Smolensk gets the jump on Des Moines, with only 8 130s against 6 203s, Smolensk loses everytime. We tested Smolensk vs Stalingrad, and found that Smolensk can tank a Stalingrad radar at max range (12km) but no less than 10km. Even tho Stalingrad can overmatch Smolensk's 16mm bow/stern, it is of very little threat until close ranges, Des Moines is a far bigger threat and Salem is an absolute counter. We tested Smolensk vs Battleship (namely the Kremlin), and found that Smolensk should indeed sail full broadside at close range because shells will overpen it. I really had to get the Harugumo/Khaba mentality into Smolensk, better broadside than angled, go figure. At the end of the day, Smolensk is truly a unique ship and I quite enjoy them, the only thing I hate about this ship is that the outrage it sparked overshadowed the CV reword for a few weeks. Smolensk was like the swine flu, its not a big problem but people were so serious about it that they forgot about the oil spill that was happening at the same time. Edited December 27, 2019 by DolphinPrincess 6 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,012 [PQUOD] Capt_Ahab1776 [PQUOD] Members 5,525 posts 28,030 battles Report post #7 Posted December 27, 2019 (edited) I agree with your comment on the Benham who may be the smooth criminal who got away. Compliments of the Smolensk scapegoating the lions share of the hate. I have the Benham and I love it! Muwahahahahaha torpedo spamming machine 😀 Capt_Ahab1776 NA server Edited December 27, 2019 by Capt_Ahab1776 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
52,537 [MAUS] LittleWhiteMouse Members 13,795 posts Report post #8 Posted December 27, 2019 (edited) 4 minutes ago, DolphinPrincess said: That said, as for the giveaway: Remember to include your username and the region you play on if you're entering the contest. I will not be chasing people down for this (I'd rather be working on my Puerto Rico review). I'll just ignore your entry if it's not complete. Edited December 27, 2019 by LittleWhiteMouse 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
17 ElmoZumwalt Members 31 posts 3,674 battles Report post #9 Posted December 27, 2019 ElmoZumwalt on NA. I really enjoyed the Benham. While some people think she is overpowered, I think that her fragility and low range torps make her somewhat balanced. As a BB main, the torp boat play was something new to me that I rather enjoyed. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
208 [WOLF6] Ghawain Members 317 posts 13,477 battles Report post #10 Posted December 27, 2019 Ghawain Region - NA Alaska is fine as a good tier 9, but the Georgia is a fun tier 9 too. I like to play survival on her and make cruisers and battleships pay for picking fights with me and showing their soft bellies. Plus, the first NA ship with guns to match the Yamato, what more is there to say? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
17 [USCC] Napoleon_B01 Members 62 posts 28,712 battles Report post #11 Posted December 27, 2019 (edited) Wow. That was an excellent summary of 2019. Nicely done. I too am hoping that 2020 brings about a far better year for the Wargaming community and Wargaming in general. For the contest, I am Napoleon_B01 in the North American region. The most memorable Premium ship of 2019 for me is the USS Benham. This ship felt like a miserable grind to get, but out of all of the special events in Warships, the Rogue Wave event was the most fun, a different change of pace compared to other events, and the ship containers had the most rewards and resources for your money. Anyways, it was a grind, but a lot of my clanmates helped me get closer to getting the ship by playing the event at the same time, and it turned into an all-out riot of a good time. The battles that we played, often sparring against each other, were absolutely hysterical. I got the Benham, and because I still hold onto my Tier 4 US Destroyer--the Clemson--playing the Benham was an easy learning curve. The primary reason I like the Benham is not because of how familiar I am with her torpedo layout and her fast-firing guns, but the combined efforts and support of my clan to help me achieve the ship was what made it memorable. I love my clan and my clanmates. Edited December 27, 2019 by Napoleon_B01 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,490 [CVA16] Sabot_100 Members 9,423 posts 28,656 battles Report post #12 Posted December 27, 2019 (edited) For the most memorable ship that I got, I am torn between Georgia and Alaska. Both seem to play well at their tier and don't seem hopeless facing T10s. However, since I had to save and scrimp forever to collect the needed FXP.... ALASKA wins! Play on the NA server. West Coast time zone Edited December 28, 2019 by Sabot_100 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
6,910 [RLGN] Estimated_Prophet Members 19,396 posts 36,215 battles Report post #13 Posted December 27, 2019 As far as your comments about the Destroyercon, go Mouse; she is the one shining light in the CV rework, that even a year later I still hate with a fire that keeps me warm in the winter. Ark actually lets me enjoy Operations again, since I mostly use carriers in that mode. One; to make sure the carrier driver is competent, (not as bad as in RTS days, but you still see occasional stinkers,) and two; because something about how I play regular ships in Ops seems to make the bots digitally shout; ‘DOOOOGPIIIILLLLEEEE!!!’ when they spot me . Ark I like, Ark I enjoy playing, (just not in PvP, as I refuse to club with carriers, and can’t slingshot anyway.) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
460 [TAZ] Nutaz Members 1,123 posts Report post #14 Posted December 27, 2019 Nutaz NA server I think the Colbert is in a similar category as the Smolensk; pure fire breather. A few more HP pool, but deadly just the same. Thinking about it Bayard is pretty good as well. French ancestry beams proud reflecting on these vessels. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
130 Fl1n7 Members 141 posts 28,669 battles Report post #15 Posted December 27, 2019 Flint_The_Pirate on NA. Benham is the best premium I've got in 2019. It rewards taking chances to get higher impact on the battle. Luckily, Smolensk came along to take the most hated ship spot. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
90 [--K--] DM31 Members 277 posts 16,131 battles Report post #16 Posted December 27, 2019 (edited) My premium of the year is Alaska B. As a new player this year the armor is appreciated when making positioning mistakes and the guns help learn proper ammunition selection. It provides enough positives to not get frustrated while learning the game. DM31 NA Edited December 27, 2019 by DM31 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1 [COB45] thegreatb0b Members 6 posts 22,341 battles Report post #17 Posted December 27, 2019 IGN: thegreatb0b Server: NA My favorite premium ship this year has been the freisland. From a mobile AA bubble that will make cvs cry, ability to outgun almost all DDs 1v1, and excellent smoke. She has served me well... HE spam for the win! Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,092 [NGA-A] JediMasterDraco Members 2,678 posts 19,178 battles Report post #18 Posted December 27, 2019 Personally to me, the fact that Puerto Rico turned out to be mediocre was a good thing. It meant that opting out like I and others did wasn’t a bad thing. It wasn’t a unique must-have. And if it had been strong, I imagine the forums would’ve entered lock-down. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
311 [-ACE-] mumphred Members 431 posts 9,225 battles Report post #19 Posted December 27, 2019 mumphred NA Benham has become my favorite boat to play, she loves spamming torps and she makes good credits. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
421 [ICOP] Ronin_ICOP [ICOP] Members 1,056 posts 24,816 battles Report post #20 Posted December 27, 2019 Thank you both for all you do to make this community better. Much appreciated. Sincerely. Amracil NA There were a few I picked up that were memorable, but Benham stands out as the most memorable of the year for me. As a DD main, the strengths of the ship are exactly what I most enjoy. Stealth, excellent smoke, and a seemingly endless supply of torpedoes with which to torment the enemy team make the ship a joy to play, even if it is considered a terror by those facing it. Respects, Am Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5,206 [PVE] Sovereigndawg Members 12,079 posts 21,321 battles Report post #21 Posted December 27, 2019 (edited) Sovereigndawg NA The Wichita, I wanted to buy her outright but never had the extra "sugar in pocket" at the time. After coveting her a bunch of times and checking to see if she was still on sale in the premium shop. I finally managed to pick her up with the first 25% off of doubloon purchases coupon. I got the doubloons from one of the ships that you could buy before you earned it, so you then get the doubloons. It was probably the Benham, but I can't be sure. Mostly I have been trying to forget 2019. As always you two, nice year end review. Lert I will hit you up with an extra thumbs up on another post. Happy New Year!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Edited December 27, 2019 by Sovereigndawg Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
649 [D6] Nachoo31 Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters 4,051 posts Report post #22 Posted December 27, 2019 I would think my favorite Premium this year would be the Thunderer. For Coal and a Tier X premium it brings the HE to a whole new level. Also to top it off, I can use Jingles in it! AP is also nice to use when you get in that brawling predicament. Nachoo31 - North America Region Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4 [CVA16] tmaco Beta Testers 50 posts 7,268 battles Report post #23 Posted December 27, 2019 Happy and safe new year everyone. I am Tmaco on NA. For me the Best/favorite premium for 2019 is the HMS ARK ROYAL. Why,? Well it is the Ark Royal and you can torp ships with stringbags and she is FUN to play. 3 wins for me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
220 [OBS] Mothermoy Members 356 posts 1,339 battles Report post #24 Posted December 27, 2019 Mothermoy North America my most memorable is def the smolensk. after missing out on all of the other unicorn ships save the mushashi, i was able to get this one. i was soo stoked Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
40 [-VT-] zeke3 Members 113 posts 17,186 battles Report post #25 Posted December 27, 2019 (edited) zeke3 North America Exeter. It's always given me good games and is surprisingly strong at tier V Edited December 27, 2019 by zeke3 added Share this post Link to post Share on other sites