Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
LunchCutter

Comparison of the RNG between 2 games

1 comment in this topic

Recommended Posts

672
[PT]
Members
785 posts
2,779 battles

Just had 2 games in a row in my North Carolina. Both games were very comparable in the teams lineups, skill level and divisions. The first game however was a complete joke in the RNG dept. Shell dispersion was horrendous, stationary targets avoided salvo after salvo at medium range, a blind enemy Pensacola wandered past me at 7k, I gave him all 3 turrets of AP for 2 hits and 2k damage... All shells on target but nothing registered. A Bismarck at 15k was hitting me consistently for 7-10k every salvo even though I was perfectly angled , but all my return shots bounced or missed by miles.. The game ended with a loss with 8 hits and 13k damage, a truly abysmal score for the 1shot-19_08.03_21_55.48-0791.thumb.jpg.9dd6a3d7ab8e9f949f4660263052076e.jpgshot-19_08.03_21.56_08-0864.thumb.jpg.004446c449693d86325c56be192da481.jpg00+ shells fired. 

 Decided to give it one more go and the next game was the polar opposite, almost as if RNG decided it was too mean the previous game. My accuracy was 10x better, although I only citadeled one target the game was infinity better. for almost the same amount of shells fired I scored 63 hits. Not a brilliant game but just shows (to me anyway) how much dumb luck and roll of the dice accuracy makes up a BB game. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×