Jump to content
WizardFerret

How to access RTS CVs on Asian server?

26 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

104
[ASALT]
Members
144 posts
5,989 battles

There is apparently the Asian server (Or some other special Chinese server) of wows where the CVs are still RTS style. Farazelleth plays it here.

 Does anyone know how to access whatever server this is and play the RTS CVs?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,098
[ARGSY]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
6,917 posts
26,905 battles

My bet would be Chinese server. 

They have their own rules there.

This should give you a first lead for what to search for.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
104
[ASALT]
Members
144 posts
5,989 battles
Just now, Erebthoron said:

My bet would be Chinese server. 

They have their own rules there.

And how do you access it?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,796
[WORX]
Members
10,635 posts
18,550 battles

You never know how to value something until its altered...

RTS was not perfect... But its way better then what we have now.

  • Cool 4
  • Boring 1
  • Meh 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,098
[ARGSY]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
6,917 posts
26,905 battles
1 minute ago, Kapitan_Wuff said:

Pretty sure I heard they were actually about to move to the reworked CVs too.

They still have the premium CV at T7, check their shop

http://mall.kongzhong.com/#002

But yes, I wouldn't trust that it will stay this way forever. They cannot add new content with the old patches.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
104
[ASALT]
Members
144 posts
5,989 battles
Just now, Kapitan_Wuff said:

Pretty sure I heard they were actually about to move to the reworked CVs too.

If they do I hope they move them to the 0.8.0 version with the unnerfed Hakuryu in all it's torpedo spam glory.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,098
[ARGSY]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
6,917 posts
26,905 battles
13 minutes ago, WizardFerret said:

unknown.png

How to use this thing.

That's why I said: learn Chinese :Smile_trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,843
[GWG]
[GWG]
Supertester
26,427 posts
14,165 battles
26 minutes ago, Navalpride33 said:

You never know how to value something until its altered...

RTS was not perfect... But its way better then what we have now.

By the numbers in the queue a lot of people disagree with you on this.

  • Cool 2
  • Meh 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,708
[WDS]
[WDS]
Members
3,566 posts
11,165 battles
35 minutes ago, Navalpride33 said:

You never know how to value something until its altered...

RTS was not perfect... But its way better then what we have now.

OK

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,796
[WORX]
Members
10,635 posts
18,550 battles
1 minute ago, BrushWolf said:

By the numbers in the queue a lot of people disagree with you on this. 

Wolfy... Do you really want to bring the numbers to o the argument??? Do you really want to use numbers to promote a propaganda position ?

  • Meh 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,843
[GWG]
[GWG]
Supertester
26,427 posts
14,165 battles
2 minutes ago, Navalpride33 said:

Wolfy... Do you really want to bring the numbers to o the argument??? Do you really want to use numbers to promote a propaganda position ?

The numbers don't lie, there are far more CV's in the queue at every level now than ever in the RTS era.

  • Cool 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,796
[WORX]
Members
10,635 posts
18,550 battles
16 minutes ago, BrushWolf said:

The numbers don't lie, there are far more CV's in the queue at every level now than ever in the RTS era.

They're are many reasons for that wolfy... My argument is, its not "new" players. Its players taking adv. of the current CV mechanic taking adv of DEFAA of surface ships being ignored.

The same argument can be said about the number of high BBs. OR a more recent even of the new OP RU BBs.

Meanwhile the "forgotten players" those who "moved on" or "quit" because of the rework. Is not made public to counter your position.

Edited by Navalpride33
  • Meh 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,241
[SALVO]
Members
24,801 posts
25,886 battles
1 hour ago, Navalpride33 said:

You never know how to value something until its altered...

RTS was not perfect... But its way better then what we have now.

No, it's most definitely NOT!!!!

  • Boring 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,241
[SALVO]
Members
24,801 posts
25,886 battles
48 minutes ago, Navalpride33 said:

They're are many reasons for that wolfy... My argument is, its not "new" players. Its players taking adv. of the current CV mechanic taking adv of DEFAA of surface ships being ignored.

The same argument can be said about the number of high BBs. OR a more recent even of the new OP RU BBs.

Meanwhile the "forgotten players" those who "moved on" or "quit" because of the rework. Is not made public to counter your position.

Well, I'm playing the new CVs because I enjoy the rework's style of CV play.  I'm most definitely NOT doing it to game some mechanic.

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,763 posts
93 battles
1 hour ago, Navalpride33 said:

They're are many reasons for that wolfy... My argument is, its not "new" players. Its players taking adv. of the current CV mechanic taking adv of DEFAA of surface ships being ignored.

The same argument can be said about the number of high BBs. OR a more recent even of the new OP RU BBs.

Meanwhile the "forgotten players" those who "moved on" or "quit" because of the rework. Is not made public to counter your position.

Oh please, spare me the rhetoric.

For one, I much prefer the Rework CVs over the RTS CVs because the controls are much more easier. 
I'm only up to T6  CVs, but if you think T6 CVs can ignore DFAA, boy do you need some wake-up call. 

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,258
[XBRTC]
Members
3,154 posts
10,065 battles
1 hour ago, Crucis said:

[CONTENT REMOVED]

Meanwhile, I don't hear you explaining anything about what--outside of the ability to abuse game mechanics and farm damage on people who can't touch you--there is to actually like about CVs these days?

Edited by Rally_Vincent
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,796
[WORX]
Members
10,635 posts
18,550 battles
14 minutes ago, RyuuohD_NA said:


I'm only up to T6  CVs, but if you think T6 CVs can ignore DFAA, boy do you need some wake-up call. 

I wish I saved the forum link to the video in where, an ATL used DEFAA and downed zero planes... Meanwhile CV can regenerate planes faster then our consumable cool downs... 

As of the current patch... Ships defensive AA is ignored to down planes (in other words its as if you dont have DEFAA equipped on your ship). Its one of many adv. CVs enjoy thanks to the DEVs work in the current patch...

I dont blame CVs.. I blame their current state on the DEVs.

Like the old saying goes. "If its murder but the powers at be let you get away with it, then its is what it is."

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12,010
[ARGSY]
Members
20,101 posts
14,317 battles
10 hours ago, Navalpride33 said:

RTS was not perfect... But its way better then what we have now.

Each has its high points. I sort of miss it. But I'm not unhappy with what we have now. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,796
[WORX]
Members
10,635 posts
18,550 battles
21 minutes ago, Ensign_Cthulhu said:

Each has its high points. I sort of miss it. But I'm not unhappy with what we have now. 

IF you agree its like an abomination of a classic..... Right now we have the Pineapple Pizza CVs and we came from NY style and deep Dish :P.

I hope you're alright Ensign..  At least we agree on something... A mutual agreement is rare in the forums they say lol.

Take care big guy :).

Edited by Navalpride33
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
5,262 posts
9,958 battles
10 hours ago, Navalpride33 said:

Wolfy... Do you really want to bring the numbers to o the argument??? Do you really want to use numbers to promote a propaganda position ?

Like your opinion that is really propaganda?  Pot calling the kettle black.

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×