Jump to content
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
Truxtun_35

US Ship Updates

77 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

103
[CBEES]
Members
79 posts
4,297 battles

OK, so now we have Russian & Japanese Battle ship Updates. What can one say WOW !!! There are truly only one group of Battle Ships in History to Survive WW2 Korea,Viet Nam & Desert Storm. Oh & go to Battle in All of them. Ok I know this is a game, but why do we see updates to Russian & Japanese Ships that are already set up unrealistically. American Battle Ships are at a definite Disadvantage to other battle ships in the game. The advantages that American Battle Ships have are inept here. Myself, I would love to see the enhancements that are now available for other country's Battle Ships Should automatically be applied to American Battle Ships. With this new update to the Russian & Japanese Battle Ships. Where is the updates to the American Battle Ships. Put some actually used equipment on American Battle Ships. By 1944 the American & British Battle Ships could & would Destroy in Battle any of the other country's Ships. Keeping in line with the Russian Battle ships that were completed after the War. The Montana's by the time they were finished (if so) would completely out class & out match any other country's Battleships. Not only sonar but the Best radar bar none would of been on them. Well just had to put this out there. Would just like to see American Battle Ships given there fare do..... 

  • Cool 6
  • Funny 3
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,223
[PHASE]
Members
4,766 posts
16,219 battles

We need as much variety and ship lines as possible. As a RU game and RU server I am sure the players there are as excited as we are about the Indianapolis.... ok, bad example.... :)

From a marketing perspective, they almost have to cater/create new ships for their respective geographic customers. This isn't some game with 15 million players. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
422
[KRAB]
Members
840 posts
7,295 battles
5 minutes ago, Truxtun_35 said:

OK, so now we have Russian & Japanese Battle ship Updates. What can one say WOW !!! There are truly only one group of Battle Ships in History to Survive WW2 Korea,Viet Nam & Desert Storm. Oh & go to Battle in All of them. Ok I know this is a game, but why do we see updates to Russian & Japanese Ships that are already set up unrealistically. American Battle Ships are at a definite Disadvantage to other battle ships in the game. The advantages that American Battle Ships have are inept here. Myself, I would love to see the enhancements that are now available for other country's Battle Ships Should automatically be applied to American Battle Ships. With this new update to the Russian & Japanese Battle Ships. Where is the updates to the American Battle Ships. Put some actually used equipment on American Battle Ships. By 1944 the American & British Battle Ships could & would Destroy in Battle any of the other country's Ships. Keeping in line with the Russian Battle ships that were completed after the War. The Montana's by the time they were finished (if so) would completely out class & out match any other country's Battleships. Not only sonar but the Best radar bar none would of been on them. Well just had to put this out there. Would just like to see American Battle Ships given there fare do..... 

I am honestly not quite sure where you are going with this. The Wyoming through Iowa got a buff to their repair party (it now heals 18.48% base instead of 14%) recently and the Montana is more than capable of standing up to any of the other tier 10 battleships. 

The only ships that might need some help are the New Mexico and New York, perhaps slightly better AA (especially for the stock hull to help out newer players) and maybe a couple seconds shaved off the New Mexico's reload (Make it 30s?). 

Colorado through Montana are fine as is in their current iterations. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
103
[CBEES]
Members
79 posts
4,297 battles

I would agree with two major acceptations, Simply, Radar All Iowa & All designed Montana's Had RADAR & had superior fire controls with their speed to boot...

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8,956
[NMKJT]
Beta Testers
23,723 posts
3,895 battles

I guess the OP wants tomahawk missiles on US battleships "Because we won da war! We da best!"

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 5
  • Boring 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,775
[WOLFG]
Members
6,046 posts
3,893 battles
1 minute ago, Truxtun_35 said:

Radar All Iowa & All designed Montana's Had RADAR & had superior fire controls with their speed to boot...

 

You mean add the radar consumable to all the T9 and T10 BBs?

You are going to need a Snickers for the wait.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
103
[CBEES]
Members
79 posts
4,297 battles

Naw just get it close to reality, I know if they did the other ships with the exception of British BB's would be out Classed :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
396
[KNCOL]
[KNCOL]
Members
506 posts
1,584 battles

AmErIcA nUmBeR oNe!1!!1!1!!1!!1!

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
103
[CBEES]
Members
79 posts
4,297 battles
26 minutes ago, Truxtun_35 said:

OK, so now we have Russian & Japanese Battle ship Updates. What can one say WOW !!! There are truly only one group of Battle Ships in History to Survive WW2 Korea,Viet Nam & Desert Storm. Oh & go to Battle in All of them. Ok I know this is a game, but why do we see updates to Russian & Japanese Ships that are already set up unrealistically. American Battle Ships are at a definite Disadvantage to other battle ships in the game. The advantages that American Battle Ships have are inept here. Myself, I would love to see the enhancements that are now available for other country's Battle Ships Should automatically be applied to American Battle Ships. With this new update to the Russian & Japanese Battle Ships. Where is the updates to the American Battle Ships. Put some actually used equipment on American Battle Ships. By 1944 the American & British Battle Ships could & would Destroy in Battle any of the other country's Ships. Keeping in line with the Russian Battle ships that were completed after the War. The Montana's by the time they were finished (if so) would completely out class & out match any other country's Battleships. Not only sonar but the Best radar bar none would of been on them. Well just had to put this out there. Would just like to see American Battle Ships given there fare do..... 

Before any in here just lose it, I want to thank those that reply with reasonable statements. Thank You much :) :) :) 

 

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
123
[-RNG-]
[-RNG-]
Members
314 posts
12,247 battles

Most USN ships are pretty much top dogs right now because of their AA. What more do you want OP?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,023
[DAKI]
Privateers, Members
8,729 posts
7,729 battles
24 minutes ago, Truxtun_35 said:

American Battle Ships are at a definite Disadvantage to other battle ships in the game

That is why we are running Montana extensively in clan battles. Gotta use the weakest ships at all cost, anything else would be illogical.

7 minutes ago, Truxtun_35 said:

Simply, Radar All Iowa & All designed Montana's Had RADAR & had superior fire controls with their speed to boot...

I am not quite sure why you want to upgrade the Fire Control of USN BBs in game. I mean, we can surely do that. Just gotta know where the fire control actually is, and how to improve that.

As you are surely aware fire control is a system that takes all the data, like heading, speed, shell velocity, etc. and then generates a firing solution on where to aim and then the guns fire at a calculated position and if one is lucky the shells and the target will meet at that location at the same time.

Now where is the fire control in game? It most certainly is not in the gun parameters, those just determine the accuracy of your guns. And as we all should know, your fire control system does not influence the gun spread. No, the fire control in-game sits in front of the monitor.

So in other words, if you want your USN BBs to have a better fire control, it is up to you to aim more accurately.

9 minutes ago, Truxtun_35 said:

Naw just get it close to reality, I know if they did the other ships with the exception of British BB's would be out Classed :)

If that includes turning all of your USN BBs into carrier escorts and ships for shore bombardment, like they mostly were during WW2, then sure. Go ahead.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8,956
[NMKJT]
Beta Testers
23,723 posts
3,895 battles
2 minutes ago, FiveStarMojo said:

Most USN ships are pretty much top dogs right now because of their AA. What more do you want OP?

He wants to be invincible and kill everything in one hit.

  • Cool 2
  • Boring 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
900 posts
3,912 battles
1 minute ago, KiyoSenkan said:
5 minutes ago, FiveStarMojo said:

Most USN ships are pretty much top dogs right now because of their AA. What more do you want OP?

He wants to be invincible and kill everything in one hit.

Kurfurst hull, yamato guns, British consumables, US flag = happy OP.  :Smile_trollface:

  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,775
[WOLFG]
Members
6,046 posts
3,893 battles
12 minutes ago, T_O_dubl_D said:

OP wants tomahawks on his Missouri

Give that red CV what he's got coming. :Smile_trollface:

Edited by DrHolmes52
Let everyone know its a joke.
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
89 posts
6,903 battles
18 minutes ago, Truxtun_35 said:

I would agree with two major acceptations, Simply, Radar All Iowa & All designed Montana's Had RADAR & had superior fire controls with their speed to boot...

 

What? Have we not learned from our mistakes in giving BBs radar (Missouri)? The battleships are fine as they are, they don't need buffs. If you wanted to give them a gimmick, I'd honestly just slap a DFAA on them, but that skill wouldn't be as useful as any other. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
90 posts
1,358 battles
4 minutes ago, SireneRacker said:

 

If that includes turning all of your USN BBs into carrier escorts and ships for shore bombardment, like they mostly were during WW2, then sure. Go ahead.

Yeah they were mostly expensive escort targets throughout the war. Airplanes, and thus Carriers, completely rewrote the book.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
977
[RKLES]
[RKLES]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
4,641 posts
15,974 battles

There have been no updates to Russian battleships as they are not released yet.

Yammy is getting an update to its model in appearance,  no other updates.

Obviously you have not played tier 8 to 10 US battleships. Their super heavy AP and better penetration angles are their quirk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,247
[WUDPS]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
5,044 posts
4,848 battles

2nd USN BB line with Pearl Refits

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
3,649 posts
3,942 battles
17 minutes ago, FiveStarMojo said:

Most USN ships are pretty much top dogs right now because of their AA. What more do you want OP?

8.5km AA range on Indy. :Smile_trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,023
[DAKI]
Privateers, Members
8,729 posts
7,729 battles
4 minutes ago, schizrade said:

Yeah they were mostly expensive escort targets throughout the war. Airplanes, and thus Carriers, completely rewrote the book.

From what I recall there were three engagements during WW2 where USN BBs faced other BBs in combat, and none of them are even close to being interesting.

1. two modern WW2-era BBs ganging up on Kirishima, a pre-WW1 ship, at night.

2. five standard type BBs shooting at an already crippled Yamashiro, which was not even sunk by that gunfire but only further crippled, only to be sunk later by even more torpedoes.

3. Massachusetts shelling Jean Bart, a non-completed and stationary ship.

None of these battles can be described as something different than shooting fish in a barrel. Not even nearly as interesting as some of the engagements between British, German and Italian Battleships.

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 2
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
90 posts
1,358 battles
24 minutes ago, SireneRacker said:

From what I recall there were three engagements during WW2 where USN BBs faced other BBs in combat, and none of them are even close to being interesting.

1. two modern WW2-era BBs ganging up on Kirishima, a pre-WW1 ship, at night.

2. five standard type BBs shooting at an already crippled Yamashiro, which was not even sunk by that gunfire but only further crippled, only to be sunk later by even more torpedoes.

3. Massachusetts shelling Jean Bart, a non-completed and stationary ship.

None of these battles can be described as something different than shooting fish in a barrel. Not even nearly as interesting as some of the engagements between British, German and Italian Battleships.

Yes. Even in WWI, the heyday of the Battleship, the cost of the things and the terror of losing them limited their engagements. I mean... its a really short list:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_naval_battles_between_battleships

The what if of this game is whats fun. The reality of Naval Combat (long distance pot-shotting) is not why most people play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,350
[POP]
Beta Testers
4,197 posts
6,029 battles

OOOOH SAY CAN YOUU SEEE.

379.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,344
[DRACS]
Members
4,734 posts

Is the OP for real??

With the new CV meta, USN ships are the BEST ships to have currently!

OP, do you even play this game? Or have you played this game in the last couple of months?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×