Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
1starchlyte

Matchmaker: Same Tier Preference Mode

8 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

10
[BLOAT]
Members
53 posts
3,674 battles

Could the Matchmaker be given an option to have same Tier matches as preference so that you don't get put into matches with higher tiers if you don't want to go up against those ships? Wait might be longer but the fights would be more balanced. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,346
[_RNG_]
Supertester
3,136 posts
5,017 battles

No. Splitting the queue is already a bad idea, and to just 'opt out' of higher tier matches makes zero sense. Any ship can damage any ship. Try just being more careful in those higher tier matches. Maybe stay a little bit further back and dont make rash decisions.

 

You cant just 'pick' to be top tier every time

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,104
[TSG4B]
Volunteer Moderator
2,928 posts
15,392 battles
26 minutes ago, RyuuohD_NA said:

Ranked Battle.

and

Mini Ranked Rush

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
868
[A-D]
Beta Testers, Alpha Tester
2,638 posts
1 hour ago, _1204_ said:

No. Splitting the queue is already a bad idea, and to just 'opt out' of higher tier matches makes zero sense.

Better than the "opt out of CV games" ridiculousness, and this one could actually be done. The queue doesn't need to be split, per se...

Just have a preference for same tier matches until some time limit, like 3 minutes or 5 minutes. If there aren't enough ships to make a preferred match in time, revert to the general queue mode of +/- 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,104
[TSG4B]
Volunteer Moderator
2,928 posts
15,392 battles
5 minutes ago, RyuuohD_NA said:

does Clan battles count too?

can you ask the OP if he can handle the CB??

:Smile_trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×