Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
kasag

Did they ninja buff the Colorado

6 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

38
[TOY]
Members
65 posts
3,912 battles

Now i love my Colorado, but no one ever accused her of being the most accurate ship out there. but i got her out today for the weekly mission and well......

 

huh.thumb.jpg.3468aa41d134c96992266f24d86bf8ad.jpg

did wargaming sneak a buff in ???

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
182
[WOLF5]
Members
752 posts
27,642 battles

wasn't a ninja buff but they reverted the sigma back to 2.0 from 1.9

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38
[TOY]
Members
65 posts
3,912 battles

ahhh ok thanks. i got 9 cits and melted everything i shot at . i did not know what had happened ...but i like it!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,189
[-RNG-]
Supertester
2,781 posts
3,689 battles

The logic was that new Mexico had more guns, so colorado should be more accurate. Havent played either since the update, but I dont think it was any major overhaul. Jist the small sigma buff

 

Fantastic game!:Smile_medal:

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,050
[WOLF2]
Beta Testers
4,647 posts

I tried Colorado out today for the first time in ages.  Was underwhelmed.  Prefer WV ‘41 these days.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
246
[CAPGO]
Members
726 posts
5,653 battles
2 hours ago, kasag said:

Now i love my Colorado, but no one ever accused her of being the most accurate ship out there. but i got her out today for the weekly mission and well......

 

huh.thumb.jpg.3468aa41d134c96992266f24d86bf8ad.jpg

did wargaming sneak a buff in ???

I think this is prob just a lucky game. I don't think 1.9 -> 2.0 sigma change will drastically change a ship. Colorado originally had 2.0 sigma and the firepower was nothing special then either

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×