455 [FGNE] JonnyFreedom Members 641 posts 1,541 battles Report post #1 Posted January 14 (edited) There is no reason a machine gun should get a bazooka too. If you want to have High DPM ships (which I Think is terrible game design and completely breaks this game), then remove their torps. There is absolutely ZERO reason Kitakazies and Harugumo's should get Torps, No Citadel, and stupid high rate of fire combined with fire chance. I feel this CV rework took devs away from fixing broken botes in an effort to resurrect a class no one wants. Old ships should have been updated, new ships should have been tested better. Instead we get a CV rework no one gives a flying one about, except a small handful of people. Most of the rework has been negative reviews, and this is the third iteration of CV's. All of that dev time could have been used to fix your current botes and balance your game at some decent level. Edited January 14 by JonnyFreedom 3 11 8 29 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4,315 [INTEL] Taichunger Members 9,261 posts 26,929 battles Report post #2 Posted January 14 This will end well. 3 9 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
120 [CUTE] Hatsuzuki_DD Members 250 posts 13,577 battles Report post #3 Posted January 14 something something remove guns from torpedo boats. 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
358 [NGA] JediMasterDraco Members 1,500 posts 8,693 battles Report post #4 Posted January 14 So should most BBs have their secondaries removed? (bats eyelashes) 5 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
35 [ARMDA] destawaits Members 320 posts 2,518 battles Report post #5 Posted January 14 2 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
13 [OPGS] BirdForce Members 89 posts 14,302 battles Report post #6 Posted January 14 Dont forget the secondary/AA gun on the kiev.. Doesnt need that either.. But dont remove my CQE I got with her.. I'll be mad 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
171 [LEGIT] Poisonous_Lily Members 690 posts 7,053 battles Report post #7 Posted January 14 Something something unbalanced. Whinning whinning complete. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
584 [SCCC] The_Painted_Target Members 652 posts 5,656 battles Report post #8 Posted January 14 >Reads post title >Reads content *inhales*HAHAHA 1 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,590 [SIM] SkaerKrow Members 3,017 posts 4,807 battles Report post #9 Posted January 14 Haragumo and Kitakaze are unbalanced. Nerf a dozen other ships. Genius. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
89 [GODS] Rickjoshi1765 Members 281 posts 9,794 battles Report post #10 Posted January 14 lets just remove everything and just sail around and trade food 5 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
124 [ROMEO] MerianCooper Beta Testers 466 posts 4,407 battles Report post #11 Posted January 14 21 minutes ago, JonnyFreedom said: There is no reason a machine gun should get a bazooka too. If you want to have High DPM ships (which I Think is terrible game design and completely breaks this game), then remove their torps. There is absolutely ZERO reason Kitakazies and Harugumo's should get Torps, No Citadel, and stupid high rate of fire combined with fire chance. I feel this CV rework took devs away from fixing broken botes in an effort to resurrect a class no one wants. Old ships should have been updated, new ships should have been tested better. Instead we get a CV rework no one gives a flying one about, except a small handful of people. Most of the rework has been negative reviews, and this is the third iteration of CV's. All of that dev time could have been used to fix your current botes and balance you game at some decent level. And, yet, the navies of the world decided to put not only guns and torps on DD, but also depth charges. Go figure. It's almost as if one type of weapon didn't suit every situation. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
984 [KP] CriMiNaL__ Beta Testers 2,482 posts 12,162 battles Report post #12 Posted January 14 15 minutes ago, JonnyFreedom said: There is no reason a machine gun should get a bazooka too. If you want to have High DPM ships (which I Think is terrible game design and completely breaks this game), then remove their torps. There is absolutely ZERO reason Kitakazies and Harugumo's should get Torps, No Citadel, and stupid high rate of fire combined with fire chance. I feel this CV rework took devs away from fixing broken botes in an effort to resurrect a class no one wants. Old ships should have been updated, new ships should have been tested better. Instead we get a CV rework no one gives a flying one about, except a small handful of people. Most of the rework has been negative reviews, and this is the third iteration of CV's. All of that dev time could have been used to fix your current botes and balance you game at some decent level. Ill give up the torps, when they remove radar and hydro, but really I love to dakka dakka BB players, and shooting its torps at CA's, the 2 DD mentioned have their drawbacks, but are so much fun to play, you should stop complaining, or better still burn baby burn. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
117 [BNKR] Ruthless4u Members 431 posts 362 battles Report post #13 Posted January 14 2 minutes ago, Rickjoshi1765 said: lets just remove everything and just sail around and trade food Then you would have Naval Action OW 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,631 [_-_] So_lt_Goes Members 1,576 posts Report post #14 Posted January 14 3 minutes ago, Rickjoshi1765 said: lets just remove everything and just sail around and trade food As long as it's bacon. 1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
783 [ZR] Personator WoWS Wiki Editor, Supertester 5,512 posts 5,345 battles Report post #15 Posted January 14 Just now, So_lt_Goes said: As long as it's bacon. And eggs. What blasphemous being doesn't have bacon with eggs? Staying on-topic, that means Minotaur should have her torps removed too right? After all it's a "High DPM" ship. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
96 [SYN] Ensign_Pulver_2016 [SYN] Members 629 posts 7,244 battles Report post #16 Posted January 14 Remove guns from IJN torp boats. If a Shimikaze can't dev strike with torps it shouldn't get another chance... 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
808 RyuuohD_NA Members 1,381 posts 47 battles Report post #17 Posted January 14 Just now, Ensign_Pulver_2016 said: Remove guns from IJN torp boats. If a Shimikaze can't dev strike with torps it shouldn't get another chance... LUL Let those scrubs keep whining, I constantly use my guns in IJN DDs and do extremely well. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
455 [FGNE] JonnyFreedom Members 641 posts 1,541 battles Report post #18 Posted January 14 19 minutes ago, JediMasterDraco said: So should most BBs have their secondaries removed? (bats eyelashes) You mean the secondaries that are next to worthless, sure if it means DD Gun Botes don't get torps. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
914 DrHolmes52 Members 3,332 posts 1,475 battles Report post #19 Posted January 14 Did someone go hunting a gunbote and found a torpedoboat instead? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4 CyborgChris Members 9 posts 5,639 battles Report post #20 Posted January 14 Just now, JonnyFreedom said: You mean the secondaries that are next to worthless, sure if it means DD Gun Botes don't get torps. Laughs in secondary build BBs farming CQC medals Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
551 [KRAK] Vaffu Members 2,012 posts 14,685 battles Report post #21 Posted January 14 33 minutes ago, JonnyFreedom said: There is no reason a machine gun should get a bazooka too. If you want to have High DPM ships (which I Think is terrible game design and completely breaks this game), then remove their torps. There is absolutely ZERO reason Kitakazies and Harugumo's should get Torps, No Citadel, and stupid high rate of fire combined with fire chance. I feel this CV rework took devs away from fixing broken botes in an effort to resurrect a class no one wants. Old ships should have been updated, new ships should have been tested better. Instead we get a CV rework no one gives a flying one about, except a small handful of people. Most of the rework has been negative reviews, and this is the third iteration of CV's. All of that dev time could have been used to fix your current botes and balance your game at some decent level. You never fail to disappoint with your constant whining. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
455 [FGNE] JonnyFreedom Members 641 posts 1,541 battles Report post #22 Posted January 14 (edited) 1 minute ago, Vaffu said: You never fail to disappoint with your constant whining. Oh hey, the DD white knight showed up. Shocker. Try playing your low win rate and dps BBs lately? I thought not. Edited January 14 by JonnyFreedom 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,271 [NDA] RedSeaBear Supertester 5,067 posts 14,855 battles Report post #23 Posted January 14 How I imagine some people play WoWs. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,476 GhostSwordsman Members 5,127 posts 5,955 battles Report post #24 Posted January 14 20 minutes ago, SkaerKrow said: Haragumo and Kitakaze are unbalanced. Nerf a dozen other ships. Genius. The sad part is, to balance them, WG need only change the 100mm HE pen to 1/5th from the 1/4th it is now. They can still be excellent anti-DD gunships but won't break the all important 32mm and 27mm threshold that currently allows them to "melt" battleships and cruisers. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
203 khorender_1 Members 851 posts 5,257 battles Report post #25 Posted January 14 7 minutes ago, JonnyFreedom said: Oh hey, the DD white knight showed up. Shocker. Try playing your low win rate and dps BBs lately? I thought not. I mainly play BB's and I totally disagree with you so and ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
