796 [GREEK] Forum_Troll Members 1,007 posts Report post #1 Posted January 14, 2019 (edited) There is no reason a machine gun should get a bazooka too. If you want to have High DPM ships (which I Think is terrible game design and completely breaks this game), then remove their torps. There is absolutely ZERO reason Kitakazies and Harugumo's should get Torps, No Citadel, and stupid high rate of fire combined with fire chance. I feel this CV rework took devs away from fixing broken botes in an effort to resurrect a class no one wants. Old ships should have been updated, new ships should have been tested better. Instead we get a CV rework no one gives a flying one about, except a small handful of people. Most of the rework has been negative reviews, and this is the third iteration of CV's. All of that dev time could have been used to fix your current botes and balance your game at some decent level. Edited January 14, 2019 by JonnyFreedom 3 11 8 29 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
10,389 [INTEL] Taichunger Members 13,459 posts 37,300 battles Report post #2 Posted January 14, 2019 This will end well. 3 9 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
301 Hatsuzuki_DD Members 485 posts 15,274 battles Report post #3 Posted January 14, 2019 something something remove guns from torpedo boats. 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
699 [NGA] JediMasterDraco Members 2,008 posts 12,325 battles Report post #4 Posted January 14, 2019 So should most BBs have their secondaries removed? (bats eyelashes) 5 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
339 [LSNB] destawaits Members 1,624 posts 4,777 battles Report post #5 Posted January 14, 2019 2 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
44 BirdForce Members 135 posts 17,412 battles Report post #6 Posted January 14, 2019 Dont forget the secondary/AA gun on the kiev.. Doesnt need that either.. But dont remove my CQE I got with her.. I'll be mad 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
317 [A-CUP] Nagato_Kai__Ni Members 1,023 posts 8,232 battles Report post #7 Posted January 14, 2019 Something something unbalanced. Whinning whinning complete. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
642 The_Painted_Target Members 689 posts 5,768 battles Report post #8 Posted January 14, 2019 >Reads post title >Reads content *inhales*HAHAHA 1 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5,147 [SIM] SkaerKrow Members 5,376 posts 8,885 battles Report post #9 Posted January 14, 2019 Haragumo and Kitakaze are unbalanced. Nerf a dozen other ships. Genius. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
92 [BTD] Rickjoshi1765 Members 294 posts 11,298 battles Report post #10 Posted January 14, 2019 lets just remove everything and just sail around and trade food 5 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
124 [ROMEO] MerianCooper Beta Testers 466 posts 4,407 battles Report post #11 Posted January 14, 2019 21 minutes ago, JonnyFreedom said: There is no reason a machine gun should get a bazooka too. If you want to have High DPM ships (which I Think is terrible game design and completely breaks this game), then remove their torps. There is absolutely ZERO reason Kitakazies and Harugumo's should get Torps, No Citadel, and stupid high rate of fire combined with fire chance. I feel this CV rework took devs away from fixing broken botes in an effort to resurrect a class no one wants. Old ships should have been updated, new ships should have been tested better. Instead we get a CV rework no one gives a flying one about, except a small handful of people. Most of the rework has been negative reviews, and this is the third iteration of CV's. All of that dev time could have been used to fix your current botes and balance you game at some decent level. And, yet, the navies of the world decided to put not only guns and torps on DD, but also depth charges. Go figure. It's almost as if one type of weapon didn't suit every situation. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,288 CriMiNaL__ Beta Testers 3,748 posts 14,457 battles Report post #12 Posted January 14, 2019 15 minutes ago, JonnyFreedom said: There is no reason a machine gun should get a bazooka too. If you want to have High DPM ships (which I Think is terrible game design and completely breaks this game), then remove their torps. There is absolutely ZERO reason Kitakazies and Harugumo's should get Torps, No Citadel, and stupid high rate of fire combined with fire chance. I feel this CV rework took devs away from fixing broken botes in an effort to resurrect a class no one wants. Old ships should have been updated, new ships should have been tested better. Instead we get a CV rework no one gives a flying one about, except a small handful of people. Most of the rework has been negative reviews, and this is the third iteration of CV's. All of that dev time could have been used to fix your current botes and balance you game at some decent level. Ill give up the torps, when they remove radar and hydro, but really I love to dakka dakka BB players, and shooting its torps at CA's, the 2 DD mentioned have their drawbacks, but are so much fun to play, you should stop complaining, or better still burn baby burn. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
140 Ruthless4u Members 598 posts 362 battles Report post #13 Posted January 14, 2019 2 minutes ago, Rickjoshi1765 said: lets just remove everything and just sail around and trade food Then you would have Naval Action OW 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4,400 [IRNBN] Balon_Greyjoy Members 3,691 posts 10,730 battles Report post #14 Posted January 14, 2019 3 minutes ago, Rickjoshi1765 said: lets just remove everything and just sail around and trade food As long as it's bacon. 1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
797 [PSV] Personator Privateers 5,523 posts 6,129 battles Report post #15 Posted January 14, 2019 Just now, So_lt_Goes said: As long as it's bacon. And eggs. What blasphemous being doesn't have bacon with eggs? Staying on-topic, that means Minotaur should have her torps removed too right? After all it's a "High DPM" ship. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
240 [SYN] Ensign_Pulver_2016 [SYN] Members 1,363 posts 10,605 battles Report post #16 Posted January 14, 2019 Remove guns from IJN torp boats. If a Shimikaze can't dev strike with torps it shouldn't get another chance... 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,265 RyuuohD_NA Members 2,767 posts 93 battles Report post #17 Posted January 14, 2019 Just now, Ensign_Pulver_2016 said: Remove guns from IJN torp boats. If a Shimikaze can't dev strike with torps it shouldn't get another chance... LUL Let those scrubs keep whining, I constantly use my guns in IJN DDs and do extremely well. 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
796 [GREEK] Forum_Troll Members 1,007 posts Report post #18 Posted January 14, 2019 19 minutes ago, JediMasterDraco said: So should most BBs have their secondaries removed? (bats eyelashes) You mean the secondaries that are next to worthless, sure if it means DD Gun Botes don't get torps. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,833 [WOLFG] DrHolmes52 Members 10,606 posts 9,844 battles Report post #19 Posted January 14, 2019 Did someone go hunting a gunbote and found a torpedoboat instead? 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4 [EULA] CyborgChris Members 9 posts 5,788 battles Report post #20 Posted January 14, 2019 Just now, JonnyFreedom said: You mean the secondaries that are next to worthless, sure if it means DD Gun Botes don't get torps. Laughs in secondary build BBs farming CQC medals Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,596 [KRAK] Vaffu Members 3,718 posts 21,738 battles Report post #21 Posted January 14, 2019 33 minutes ago, JonnyFreedom said: There is no reason a machine gun should get a bazooka too. If you want to have High DPM ships (which I Think is terrible game design and completely breaks this game), then remove their torps. There is absolutely ZERO reason Kitakazies and Harugumo's should get Torps, No Citadel, and stupid high rate of fire combined with fire chance. I feel this CV rework took devs away from fixing broken botes in an effort to resurrect a class no one wants. Old ships should have been updated, new ships should have been tested better. Instead we get a CV rework no one gives a flying one about, except a small handful of people. Most of the rework has been negative reviews, and this is the third iteration of CV's. All of that dev time could have been used to fix your current botes and balance your game at some decent level. You never fail to disappoint with your constant whining. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
796 [GREEK] Forum_Troll Members 1,007 posts Report post #22 Posted January 14, 2019 (edited) 1 minute ago, Vaffu said: You never fail to disappoint with your constant whining. Oh hey, the DD white knight showed up. Shocker. Try playing your low win rate and dps BBs lately? I thought not. Edited January 14, 2019 by JonnyFreedom 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
3,745 [--K--] RedSeaBear Members 5,389 posts 17,889 battles Report post #23 Posted January 14, 2019 How I imagine some people play WoWs. 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,021 GhostSwordsman Members 6,166 posts 7,848 battles Report post #24 Posted January 14, 2019 20 minutes ago, SkaerKrow said: Haragumo and Kitakaze are unbalanced. Nerf a dozen other ships. Genius. The sad part is, to balance them, WG need only change the 100mm HE pen to 1/5th from the 1/4th it is now. They can still be excellent anti-DD gunships but won't break the all important 32mm and 27mm threshold that currently allows them to "melt" battleships and cruisers. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
396 [B808] khorender_1 Members 1,326 posts 7,773 battles Report post #25 Posted January 14, 2019 7 minutes ago, JonnyFreedom said: Oh hey, the DD white knight showed up. Shocker. Try playing your low win rate and dps BBs lately? I thought not. I mainly play BB's and I totally disagree with you so and ? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
