Jump to content
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
Brother_Lobo

Is MISSOURI coming back?

147 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

74
[DNTZ]
Members
342 posts
15,559 battles
3 minutes ago, Brother_Lobo said:

I have over 750k free xp. I want the Battleship Missouri. Will it be coming back any time soon?

All indications are no.  WG has stated it prints too many credits. They have stated other ships in the past would never come back - and then they did.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
56
[GTF]
[GTF]
Members
73 posts

Maybe one day.. But I'm pretty sure it won't be a free xp ship, more than likely a coal/steel ship. 

 

But hold onto that free xp, I'm certain the USS Alaska will be a free xp ship. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,383
[PVE]
[PVE]
Members
8,311 posts
21,572 battles
6 minutes ago, CapChandler said:

Maybe one day.. But I'm pretty sure it won't be a free xp ship, more than likely a coal/steel ship. 

You know I never thought of it becoming available for steel but I would bet money that is a plan somewhere in Wargaming's lair... Great insight Cap!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,101
[N-W-T]
Members
1,837 posts
7,247 battles

No. The MO isn't an overpowered ship per se.  It's just that its credit earning potential breaks the game economy.  That's even moreso that they introduced new premium credit earning flags. $2M credits in an average game?  $4M if you do well?  It was a mistake. It's probably the one ship that won't ever be reintroduced.  Only way it comes back is if/when WOWS population starts to decline enough that they get desperate. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
310 posts
39 battles
36 minutes ago, CapChandler said:

Maybe one day.. But I'm pretty sure it won't be a free xp ship, more than likely a coal/steel ship. 

 

But hold onto that free xp, I'm certain the USS Alaska will be a free xp ship. 

The Alaska appears to cost 1 million free xp.

  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,466
[NGAGE]
Clan Supertest Coordinator
4,618 posts
6,923 battles
1 minute ago, TheSeventhSeeker said:

The Alaska appears to cost 1 million free xp.

That's probably just a placeholder value for now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,383
[PVE]
[PVE]
Members
8,311 posts
21,572 battles
5 minutes ago, DouglasMacAwful said:

No. The MO isn't an overpowered ship per se.  It's just that its credit earning potential breaks the game economy.  That's even moreso that they introduced new premium credit earning flags. $2M credits in an average game?  $4M if you do well?  It was a mistake. It's probably the one ship that won't ever be reintroduced.  Only way it comes back is if/when WOWS population starts to decline enough that they get desperate. 

You know I keep hearing that repeated. I own the MO, don't play her all that much and not even sure I ever played her in PvP. I don't keep premium time as a rule and play mostly tier 8 and below all in co-op. That said, I keep a credit balance of half a billion mostly thru just playing low tier ships. I only play tier 8s and up to complete missions or campaigns. I hardly ever use signals or premium consumables and have multiple thousands of flags, consumables, and one use camos.

The economy is only a problem if you use all the stuff that gives you an advantage in the game or run up the tech tree instead of grinding captains at lower tiers before banking enough credits to keep you in the black moving up. Failure to plan ahead and/or living beyond your means seems to be a theme with players struggling with the economy.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
807
[WOLF3]
Members
1,632 posts
6,255 battles

Mass and Mikhael Kutozov are 2 that will never be back.  Mass because of economy and Mickey K because of OP.

I wouldn't worry about the current price tag on Alaska.  The did the same thing with Musashi (950k).  It should not cost more than the Kronstadt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
121
[WOLF2]
Members
299 posts
5,912 battles
16 minutes ago, Captain_Slattery said:

Mass and Mikhael Kutozov are 2 that will never be back.  Mass because of economy and Mickey K because of OP.

I wouldn't worry about the current price tag on Alaska.  The did the same thing with Musashi (950k).  It should not cost more than the Kronstadt.

you mean Miss (Missouri) right?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
310 posts
39 battles
36 minutes ago, yashma said:

That's probably just a placeholder value for now.

The placeholder value was 9999 gold, I wouldn't be surprised if it costs 1 million XP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
945
[VW]
Members
3,032 posts
15,591 battles
1 hour ago, TheSeventhSeeker said:

The Alaska appears to cost 1 million free xp.

they said the same for the mushy

and no for the miz.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
106
[KNCOL]
Alpha Tester
218 posts
3,741 battles
1 hour ago, Brother_Lobo said:

I have over 750k free xp. I want the Battleship Missouri. Will it be coming back any time soon?

For everyone person that asks they push it back another 750,000 days. 

Edited by Lorian_ElderPrince

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,076
[O_O]
Members
5,447 posts
12,445 battles
1 hour ago, DouglasMacAwful said:

No. The MO isn't an overpowered ship per se.  It's just that its credit earning potential breaks the game economy.  That's even moreso that they introduced new premium credit earning flags. $2M credits in an average game?  $4M if you do well?  It was a mistake. It's probably the one ship that won't ever be reintroduced.

I have had some pretty good games with Missouri.  Some were even with premium time, Gamescom camo, and most were with both credit signals.  I have never made over $2M in a game, much less $4M.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
179
[TFLT]
[TFLT]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
736 posts
10,183 battles

They may or may not offer it for direct sale again, but I'd look for it in some kind of loot box in the future.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
116
Members
309 posts

What, do you mean to say that the ship that would be here to stay isn't available?

 

WG's word is trash - never forget.

  • Cool 2
  • Boring 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
807
[WOLF3]
Members
1,632 posts
6,255 battles
3 hours ago, LCPL4ever said:

you mean Miss (Missouri) right?

Yes.  Yes, I do.  Sorry for that.  The Massachusetts will be around for a good long while.  I just wish I could have gotten a Missouri when they were available.  While everyone else was farming ops to get her, I was farming ops to get the Nelson.  I just didn't have enough online time then.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
808
[WAG]
Members
1,756 posts
10,365 battles
4 hours ago, Brother_Lobo said:

I have over 750k free xp. I want the Battleship Missouri. Will it be coming back any time soon?

Given the walk back on many of the things that WG has said in the past, It would not be a surprise to see that they bring it back.  IOW, do not take anything WG says as anything more than what they think at that moment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,156
Members
2,691 posts
10,432 battles

They could always introduce Big J, it is the most decorated BB among all Iowa class.  Just make it identical to Mo in all ways except the credit multiplier, and it will be desirable ship to many people that did not get the Mo.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
525
[WOLF1]
Members
2,751 posts

as a ship of historical significance, i'd like WG to bring back MO, you spent tons of time developed/tested this, why not make it available to the masses to reap the most benefit for your work? as about printing too much credit, you can nerf that we don't mind

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,851
[WOLFG]
Members
6,221 posts
4,084 battles
1 minute ago, Happy668 said:

as a ship of historical significance, i'd like WG to bring back MO, you spent tons of time developed/tested this, why not make it available to the masses to reap the most benefit for your work? as about printing too much credit, you can nerf that we don't mind

Be careful with that we.  I would guess a whole bunch of people would mind.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,383
[PVE]
[PVE]
Members
8,311 posts
21,572 battles
Just now, Happy668 said:

 as about printing too much credit, you can nerf that we don't mind

It would cause a riot here in the forums that would make "AlabamaGate" or the infamous "Graf Zeppelin Debacle of 2017" look like happy party times... 

  • Cool 1
  • Boring 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27,179
[HINON]
Supertester
21,476 posts
15,219 battles
4 hours ago, TheSeventhSeeker said:

The Alaska appears to cost 1 million free xp.

Source on that?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
793
[GREEK]
Members
1,007 posts
4 hours ago, DouglasMacAwful said:

No. The MO isn't an overpowered ship per se.  It's just that its credit earning potential breaks the game economy.  That's even moreso that they introduced new premium credit earning flags. $2M credits in an average game?  $4M if you do well?  It was a mistake. It's probably the one ship that won't ever be reintroduced.  Only way it comes back is if/when WOWS population starts to decline enough that they get desperate. 

So, next week then?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
525
[WOLF1]
Members
2,751 posts
2 minutes ago, DrHolmes52 said:

Be careful with that we.  I would guess a whole bunch of people would mind.

i understand those who already had her would mind, but to be fair to all players, they already reap the credit printing benefit for a year? time to reduce that to provide level playing field, at the same time, let way more players enjoy WG's work

Edited by Happy668
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×