Jump to content
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
Ocoda

Ranked Battles

16 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Members
1,215 posts
3,177 battles

Because a 3 man division of good players would have an insanely high winrate. Divions have so much influence on randoms, just think how much influence one could have in a game with less people.  Ranked is supposed to be a single player skill thing even though that isnt really how it works. 

Edited by CarbonButtprint
  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,045
[RCNW3]
Beta Testers
3,066 posts
25,374 battles

Would that not cause an indirect disadvantage to your opponents ? ? ? ? ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,073
[INTEL]
[INTEL]
Members
7,582 posts
33,865 battles
1 minute ago, CarbonButtprint said:

Because a 3 man divion of good players would have an insanely high winrate. Divions have so much influence on randoms, just think how much influence one could have in a game with less people.  Ranked is supposed to be a single player skill thing even though that isnt really how it works. 

^^this

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,690
[X-PN]
[X-PN]
Members
9,144 posts
10,745 battles

Seriously?

 

If you need to guarantee victory, why not just have WG flip a coin before each match, and have the teams draw straws to see who doesn't lose a star. Divisions are strong, and in a battle with 7 players, even a 2 man div would completely skew the game in that team's favor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5
[FLKRS]
Members
31 posts
9,992 battles

Division in competitive? I believe those are called Clan Battles. Solo competitive = ranked. 

You already got what you wanted. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,546
[GWG]
[GWG]
Supertester
25,749 posts
14,009 battles

Because Ranked is supposed to be about the individual. That is why I would like to see the impact of the team reduced, it can never be completely removed, by going to a top 12(?) base experience receive a star. Losing stars would need to be revamped because of this but maybe just make it that if you are not in the top group work like advancing/losing league position in CW where if you are not in that you have to be in the top group 3 out of 5 matches or you lose a star.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
4 posts
1,414 battles

Ok considering the fact that I am new to the Wargamming forums, I have yet to figure out how to start a response for myself. So with this being said, I have to piggy-back on your post atm.

I have an issue with logging into the game. I am blocked with buffering at the ID and PW stage to where I cant type that info in. How can I fix this or what can be done?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,764
[TBW]
Members
10,010 posts
16,813 battles
54 minutes ago, Nagro15 said:

Solo competitive = ranked. 

Not very solo competitive when they link you with random teams. It should be called are you lucky season, well are ya?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50
[WOLFB]
[WOLFB]
Members
271 posts
7,038 battles
18 minutes ago, FatherTyme_1 said:

Ok considering the fact that I am new to the Wargamming forums, I have yet to figure out how to start a response for myself. So with this being said, I have to piggy-back on your post atm.

I have an issue with logging into the game. I am blocked with buffering at the ID and PW stage to where I cant type that info in. How can I fix this or what can be done?

Go to the Support forum: https://forum.worldofwarships.com/forum/125-world-of-warships-feedback-and-bugs/

Then click the Start New Topic button in the upper right-hand corner:

image.png.b9efa65cefac7491115c9c8f5129617d.png

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
6,374 posts
20,050 battles

many do. its just not called divisions. It's called drop syncing, and while I hate and won't explain how easy it is to take advantage of, I bring it up with the hope that WG changes their que mechanism to help stop this practice. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,546
[GWG]
[GWG]
Supertester
25,749 posts
14,009 battles
8 minutes ago, APA_204 said:

many do. its just not called divisions. It's called drop syncing, and while I hate and won't explain how easy it is to take advantage of, I bring it up with the hope that WG changes their que mechanism to help stop this practice. 

As long as the people sync dropping treat the other people that dropped with them as Red = Dead there is no problem. This would be more of an issue if the top by base experience proposal was in play but even then helping another player in ranked would still be hurting yourself.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
6,374 posts
20,050 battles
3 minutes ago, BrushWolf said:

As long as the people sync dropping treat the other people that dropped with them as Red = Dead there is no problem. This would be more of an issue if the top by base experience proposal was in play but even then helping another player in ranked would still be hurting yourself.

yes, but that doesn't happen, if the intent is to circumvent the fair system, what makes you thing that said players will be fair in game? especially in voice coms....when they drop three and its two vs one and they are telling each other where to go or allowing their own ship to be killed to funnel xp to their friend.....

I know it doesn't happen often, but there are some that do it non stop. Ever wonder how some in the same clan all rank out at the same time and almost the exact amount of games? 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,546
[GWG]
[GWG]
Supertester
25,749 posts
14,009 battles
Just now, APA_204 said:

yes, but that doesn't happen, if the intent is to circumvent the fair system, what makes you thing that said players will be fair in game? especially in voice coms....when they drop three and its two vs one and they are telling each other where to go or allowing their own ship to be killed to funnel xp to their friend.....

I know it doesn't happen often, but there are some that do it non stop. Ever wonder how some in the same clan all rank out at the same time and almost the exact amount of games? 

You are correct but unless you can catch them in the act with a replay it is almost impossible to prove. It is also impossible to stop so all we can do is hope that the majority are playing to win and not to sabotage the match in favor of another player.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
6,374 posts
20,050 battles
1 minute ago, BrushWolf said:

You are correct but unless you can catch them in the act with a replay it is almost impossible to prove. It is also impossible to stop so all we can do is hope that the majority are playing to win and not to sabotage the match in favor of another player.

Fully agree and it doesn't happen often. Again I only bring it up with the hope that WG reads this and puts the ranked que in some sort of scrambler mode to help stop this practice completely.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,546
[GWG]
[GWG]
Supertester
25,749 posts
14,009 battles
1 hour ago, APA_204 said:

Fully agree and it doesn't happen often. Again I only bring it up with the hope that WG reads this and puts the ranked que in some sort of scrambler mode to help stop this practice completely.

That is a good idea. I wonder how much something like that would impact que times? If they could keep that comfortably under one minute it wouldn't be an issue but there would still need to be a circuit breaker for low population times since Ranked is available 24/7 during the season.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×