Jump to content
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
Erebthoron

RN T9 DD: Jutland

48 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,123
[ARGSY]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
5,106 posts
18,628 battles

British destroyer Jutland, tier IX

Hit points – 18400. Plating - 19 mm.

Hull (A) main battery - 2х2 and 1х1 114mm

Hull (B) main battery - 3x2 114 mm. Firing range – 13.2 km. Maximum HE shell damage – 1700. Chance to cause fire – 8%. Maximum AP shell damage - 2100. Reload time - 3.5 s. 180 degree turn time - 9 s. Maximum dispersion - 114 m. HE initial velocity - 746 m/s. AP initial velocity - 746 m/s. Sigma value – 2.0.

Torpedo tubes - 2x5 533 mm. Maximum damage - 15533. Range - 10.0 km. Speed - 62 kt. Reload time - 120 s. Launcher 180 degree turn time – 7.2 s. Torpedo detectability - 1.3 km.

Instead of choosing between wide and narrow spreads, captains can choose to fire off individual torpedoes or expend the entire launcher at once.

AA defense - 3х1 40 mm, range - 3.5 km, damage per second - 261. 2х2 40 mm, range - 3,5 km, damage per second - 38. 3х2 114 mm, range - 5.0 km, damage per second - 45.

Maximum speed - 34 kt. Turning circle radius - 610 m. Rudder shift time – 4.2 s. Surface detectability – 7,0 km. Air detectability – 4.1 km. Detectability after firing main guns in smoke – 2,4 km.

Available consumables:

Slot 1 - Damage Control Party

Slot 2 - Smoke Generator

Emission time 15 s;
Duration time 110 s;
Cooldown 240 s and 160 s for Smoke Generator II;
Charges 2 and 3 for Smoke Generator II;
Radius - 600 m.
Slot 3 - Engine Boost / Hydroacoustic Search

Torpedo detection range 2,37 km
Ship detection range 3,51 km
Duration 180 s
Cooldown 180 s and 120 s for Hydroacoustic Search II
Charges 2 and 3 for Hydroacoustic Search II
All stats are listed without crew and upgrade modifiers but with best available modules. The stats are subject to change during the testing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,612
[INTEL]
Members
8,416 posts
25,261 battles

This looks promising. Base gun and torp range is solid. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,418
[HINON]
Supertester
7,520 posts
7,578 battles
2 minutes ago, Taichunger said:

This looks promising. Base gun and torp range is solid. 

:Smile_great:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22,446
[HINON]
Supertester
18,912 posts
12,446 battles
13 minutes ago, Erebthoron said:

Hull (B) main battery - 3x2 114 mm. <snip> Reload time - 3.5 s.

 

  • Funny 3
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WoWS Wiki Editor
7,205 posts
6,433 battles
35 minutes ago, Erebthoron said:

3х1 40 mm, range - 3.5 km, damage per second - 261

What in the three names of Satan...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
325
[SYN]
[SYN]
Members
1,321 posts
14,681 battles

So, are these essentially Akizukis?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
98
[NNC]
[NNC]
Beta Testers
397 posts
5,583 battles

I'm certain those are the incorrect mounts for Jutland. That picture shows the Mark VI mounts used on the Daring class (same as the secondaries on Neptune), while Jutland had Mark IV and V mounts.

 

38_eagle.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
400
[VVV]
Members
2,396 posts
17 minutes ago, Noble_Taipan said:

I'm certain those are the incorrect mounts for Jutland. That picture shows the Mark VI mounts used on the Daring class (same as the secondaries on Neptune), while Jutland had Mark IV and V mounts.

 

38_eagle.jpg

Yep. Pity, the Battle turrets were better-looking than Daring's AA boxes.

36176032_2098578110468525_12623256517596

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
33 posts
4,114 battles
21 minutes ago, Noble_Taipan said:

I'm certain those are the incorrect mounts for Jutland. That picture shows the Mark VI mounts used on the Daring class (same as the secondaries on Neptune), while Jutland had Mark IV and V mounts.

You're right, she should, since she's the 1943 version of the Battle class. The only time the Mk. VI mount was used on any of the Battle class ships was on modified Australian ones. Jutland isn't one of these so I'm not exactly what WG was thinking here.

 

Also, a 120 second cooldown on 15k damage torps? That's pretty funny.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
830
[SBS]
Members
2,416 posts
2,253 battles
50 minutes ago, Taichunger said:

This looks promising. Base gun and torp range is solid. 

Yes, but only 114mm guns, going to need IFHE (unless the RN DDs gets special pen values).  Also, I'm not digging the 34 kt speed.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,612
[INTEL]
Members
8,416 posts
25,261 battles
15 hours ago, Slimeball91 said:

Yes, but only 114mm guns, going to need IFHE (unless the RN DDs gets special pen values).  Also, I'm not digging the 34 kt speed.

I take back everything I said....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,302
[CUTE]
Members
5,152 posts
3,430 battles

34 Knots? Yeah.... you're never getting away from radar like that, especially with your stupor-dupor gimpy hydro equipped!

Nothing to see here folks! At least they did the bait and switch when it comes to the KM ships. This time they appear to have run out of bait!

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,045
[SYN]
[SYN]
Members
6,666 posts
9,985 battles

34kt and to take your special/unique/bad hydro you have to give up speed boost? Ehhh.

HE DPM is fantastic, beating Fletcher (a little narrowly) but losing out to whatever the T9 Akizuki is.

Stealth is fantastic.

Torpedoes are pretty woeful.

Thank goodness for the concealment!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
98
[NNC]
[NNC]
Beta Testers
397 posts
5,583 battles

Actually, I think the picture they used for the Jutland post is actually the Daring. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,302
[CUTE]
Members
5,152 posts
3,430 battles
1 hour ago, Slimeball91 said:

Yes, but only 114mm guns, going to need IFHE (unless the RN DDs gets special pen values).

Not to shoot at nerfed armour DD you don't...Yay?

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,123
[ARGSY]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
5,106 posts
18,628 battles
5 minutes ago, _no_one_ said:

What i really want to know , where is the tribal class? 

On it's way to make two premium ships

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
475 posts
5,642 battles
Just now, Erebthoron said:

On it's way to make two premium ships

Premium? s-h-i-t

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,123
[ARGSY]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
5,106 posts
18,628 battles
4 hours ago, Noble_Taipan said:

Actually, I think the picture they used for the Jutland post is actually the Daring. 

You are right, both are the same pics.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
98
[NNC]
[NNC]
Beta Testers
397 posts
5,583 battles

Only just now noticed that it has a fantasy upgrade where the rear single gun turret gets an extra gun. I'm not complaining. Thanks for sharing the update @Wolcott

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,045
[SYN]
[SYN]
Members
6,666 posts
9,985 battles

I quite want to see a picture of the A hull with 5 guns, the 5th should be amidships just aft of the funnel. If they've put it in Y position and then just double it for the B hull it'll be a shame and make the ship more paper than necessary.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Supertester
1,460 posts
16 battles
40 minutes ago, mofton said:

I quite want to see a picture of the A hull with 5 guns, the 5th should be amidships just aft of the funnel. If they've put it in Y position and then just double it for the B hull it'll be a shame and make the ship more paper than necessary.

The last dev blog post seemed to show a picture of the A-hull. Doesn't show the aft of the ship in great detail though.

Image may contain: sky, outdoor and water

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,045
[SYN]
[SYN]
Members
6,666 posts
9,985 battles
2 minutes ago, Trainspite said:

The last dev blog post seemed to show a picture of the A-hull. Doesn't show the aft of the ship in great detail though.

Indistinct, but not promising :Smile_sad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×