Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
utrow

Myoko survivability

12 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

0
[TAFFY]
[TAFFY]
Members
5 posts
21,067 battles

Myoko to research the hulls A hull has 49 survivability B hull is +2 for 51 survivability C hull is +2 for only 51 when it should be 53 - customer service says go to forums so who is going to fix this mistake before I get to Myoko

 

  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
60
[NBGC]
Members
331 posts
3,565 battles

It isn't a HUGE bug. The survivability rating doesn't really matter. The actual hitpoints will be correct. 

There are much more serious bugs that WG needs to take care of at the moment (ex. crashing issues).

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,014
[5D7]
Alpha Tester
2,716 posts
4,076 battles

If you have the A Hull equipped (which since you don't have it yet that is what it shows as) it will only show +2 on both because it is comparing them to the current A hull. If you have the B hull equipped then look at the C hull, there will be no + or - anything. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0
[TAFFY]
[TAFFY]
Members
5 posts
21,067 battles

LOL - it did matter and they changed the survivability to 54.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,273
[RKLES]
Members
7,214 posts
9,006 battles
On 5/11/2018 at 5:37 PM, Rpkscout1 said:

It isn't a HUGE bug. The survivability rating doesn't really matter. The actual hitpoints will be correct. 

There are much more serious bugs that WG needs to take care of at the moment (ex. crashing issues).

Totally agree since the crashing issues can get you sunk and can cause significant losses. The mislabeled Myoko survivability on the other hand will not,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0
[TAFFY]
[TAFFY]
Members
5 posts
21,067 battles

With so many small things they add up- an maybe the game wouldn't crash if they were fixed like the Seattle  is not suppose to have a plane but yet when in drydock it has a plane midship an the cranes- so tell Wargaming stop putting things on ships that cant be used also just got the Worcester capt pts got concealment and concealment on the upgrade which at beginning should be 70 total put on ship its 68- the small piles are adding up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,844 posts
17,666 battles
On ‎7‎/‎4‎/‎2018 at 11:21 PM, utrow said:

LOL - it did matter and they changed the survivability to 54.

 

Your mistaken...you probably added a commander w/the extra HP skill to increase the survivability. They didn't change the Myoko's survivability & there never will be any difference in the survivability from B-C hull in the Myoko (or any other ship for that matter)...either 1 will increase it by 2 from the A hull & that is all.

After 17k games this is what you make your 1st posts in the forums about...something that for anybody w/anything over 2k games could easily have figured out by now...as it has been the same thing every time you have a ship w/3 hull options...the HP from B to C always stays the same & survivability only increases from A to B or A to C but never from B to C.

Welcome to the forums but as far as 1st impressions go you kinda derped this 1.

Although sometimes there are people that give comments that have nothing to do with the question at hand & are just unrelated rants...

 

On ‎5‎/‎11‎/‎2018 at 3:37 PM, Rpkscout1 said:

It isn't a HUGE bug. The survivability rating doesn't really matter. The actual hitpoints will be correct. 

There are much more serious bugs that WG needs to take care of at the moment (ex. crashing issues).

the forums are a great place to get questions in regards to the game answered by people that do know what they are talking about.

 

You had your explanation from the 2nd comment...

On ‎5‎/‎11‎/‎2018 at 3:46 PM, Batwingsix said:

If you have the A Hull equipped (which since you don't have it yet that is what it shows as) it will only show +2 on both because it is comparing them to the current A hull. If you have the B hull equipped then look at the C hull, there will be no + or - anything. 

& a repeat of the correct explanation in the 3rd comment...

On ‎5‎/‎11‎/‎2018 at 3:53 PM, cheereereerios said:

B and C hull have the same hitpoints. They are both a +2 compared to the A-hull.

yet you chose the option of ignoring the actual answers to your question that was given & dubbing in your own misinformation.

  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0
[TAFFY]
[TAFFY]
Members
5 posts
21,067 battles
On ‎5‎/‎11‎/‎2018 at 5:37 PM, Rpkscout1 said:

It isn't a HUGE bug. The survivability rating doesn't really matter. The actual hitpoints will be correct. 

There are much more serious bugs that WG needs to take care of at the moment (ex. crashing issues).

 

On ‎5‎/‎11‎/‎2018 at 5:53 PM, cheereereerios said:

B and Chull have the same hitpoints. They are both a +2 compared to the A-hull.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
0
[TAFFY]
[TAFFY]
Members
5 posts
21,067 battles

ifYouSeekKaos lol dude the only thing derped is your comment an shows actually how much you know about the situation or even payed attention to the little details WOW changed what I [RANTED] about which proves my point - for a detailed explanation in crayon your more than welcome to mess me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,844 posts
17,666 battles
On ‎7‎/‎24‎/‎2018 at 1:51 PM, utrow said:

ifYouSeekKaos lol dude the only thing derped is your comment an shows actually how much you know about the situation or even payed attention to the little details WOW changed what I [RANTED] about which proves my point - for a detailed explanation in crayon your more than welcome to mess me.

On ‎5‎/‎11‎/‎2018 at 3:30 PM, utrow said:

Myoko to research the hulls A hull has 49 survivability B hull is +2 for 51 survivability C hull is +2 for only 51 when it should be 53 - customer service says go to forums so who is going to fix this mistake before I get to Myoko

 

As for the 1st item highlighted n bold:  No they didn't.

As for your original rant (also highlighted in bold) that you seem to think they "changed" something on account of:  Send your commander w/"Survivability Expert" skill to reserves & watch the "change" that you imagined WoWs did miraculously be unchanged after all...as your survivability drops right back down to the 51 that the Myoko maxes out at w/out it.

 

If your crayons are not highlighting a Myoko w/out a commander assigned w/any amount of survivability points over 51 don't bother w/the "detailed explanation".

 

Edited by IfYouSeeKhaos
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×