Jump to content
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
Herr_Reitz

Submarines to counter carriers

6 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

479
[SAA]
Members
908 posts
27,856 battles

Cool info!  Glad the US Navy got a hold of a Gotland so they can work on tactics.  I remember in the late 70's Canada sent one of there old DD's down to play with our subs off the west coast.  The Canadian DD not only found our sub and sank it, it did it in the first day of a 2 week navel exercise!  Boy where there some pissed off US admirals then! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,830
[V_KNG]
Beta Testers
9,284 posts

In warfare, like sports, it's always best to truly know your opponents so you may exploit their weaknesses... due diligence is a priority for the military (or should be). 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,161
Alpha Tester
5,337 posts
2,532 battles

Yeah, the state of training in the U.S. Navy is in a sorry state. Jive Turkey, a former sonar man on 688 and Ohio-class missile subs who frequently livestreams Cold Waters, has said so on multiple occasions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
211
[O_O]
Members
792 posts
4,925 battles

AIP diesels are going to be a sticking point for quite some time, this is not particularly surprising and "losing" carriers to them in exercises does actually happen on pretty regular occasion. 

CVNs used to have two or three frigates, a destroyer or two and a cruiser in close company, each of which had an SH-2, -3 or -60 (era-dependent), the carrier had S-3s and helos as well.  Now they're lucky to have any more than a destroyer or cruiser sticking with them, S-3s are gone and though there are a good number of friendly submarines around, most of them are off conducting "national tasking."  Very helpful when they're the units the surface fleet uses to excuse their willful (and woeful) lack of material and manpower preparations for antisubmarine operations.

At this point the carrier-operating nations only really have two options, though they're reasonably effective ones; strike the submarines in port before they sortie, or simply avoid the places they operate.  A choke point can still be blitzed, but it's an extremely dangerous, messy and expensive option.

Of course, I'll apply my very most favorite caveat to all of this; it's just my opinion and as has been demonstrated time after time to be worth less than a penny.

-R

Edited by Mister_Rawr
True Fact #2397: Your shoes find your feet delicious and filling. Enjoy thinking about that for the next few minutes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×