Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
MajorRenegade

Here is my idea how we can do CV rework

19 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

4,581
[ERN]
[ERN]
Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
10,101 posts
4,223 battles

just open up a Sandbox server for Wows like how they did with the arty rework and 1.0 update in wot. This will allow us to mess around with a lot of things without messing with the supertest and live server.

 

enough said

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
317
[SYJ]
[SYJ]
Members
917 posts
2,119 battles

I came across the best guide to play CVs on reddit the other day... 

Spoiler

EYFpzIc.thumb.png.3fa0484e70a0cbd01ecfb6e340d0f4f2.png

 

  • Funny 3
  • Boring 1
  • Bad 3
  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,367
[HINON]
[HINON]
Beta Testers
5,913 posts
5,198 battles
7 minutes ago, IWantedOption1 said:

I came across the best guide to play CVs on reddit the other day... 

  Hide contents

EYFpzIc.thumb.png.3fa0484e70a0cbd01ecfb6e340d0f4f2.png

 

Joke stopped being funny about 2 years ago.

  • Cool 2
  • Boring 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
317
[SYJ]
[SYJ]
Members
917 posts
2,119 battles
4 minutes ago, Captain_Dorja said:

Joke stopped being funny about 2 years ago.

So did having more posts than battles

  • Cool 2
  • Funny 2
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,581
[ERN]
[ERN]
Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
10,101 posts
4,223 battles
1 hour ago, IWantedOption1 said:

I came across the best guide to play CVs on reddit the other day... 

  Hide contents

EYFpzIc.thumb.png.3fa0484e70a0cbd01ecfb6e340d0f4f2.png

 

haha very funny

sF4B7Xd.gif

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,116
[SOUP]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
7,284 posts

My solution to the problem:
Let the people who are paid to handle it handle it.

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
141
Alpha Tester, Members, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
1,609 posts
3,807 battles
2 hours ago, Chobittsu said:

My solution to the problem:
Let the people who are paid to handle it handle it.

clearly the point click adventure ship that is Graf Zeppelin show they really know what they are doing, and not like it just murders every thing it sees, and just make AA build ship point less.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,005
[ABDA]
Beta Testers
16,014 posts
11,530 battles
10 hours ago, Captain_Dorja said:

Joke stopped being funny about 2 years ago.

No it didn't.  CVs can go away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
138
[ICOP]
Members
771 posts
3,049 battles
10 hours ago, Chobittsu said:

My solution to the problem:
Let the people who are paid to handle it handle it.

Does not matter which method is chosen, the result will be the same as the player base will have a measure of input however the method used determines what amount of measure will be given.

The sandbox concept is solid option in which both parties can benefit from and even in the end the ones that are paid will handle it but will be handled the right way?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,259
[WOLF2]
Members
2,992 posts
5,204 battles
8 hours ago, akh101 said:

clearly the point click adventure ship that is Graf Zeppelin show they really know what they are doing, and not like it just murders every thing it sees, and just make AA build ship point less.

Well people have been demanding manual drops be removed for some time now. Guess they should have been more specific.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
414
[NATO]
Beta Testers
1,764 posts
5,802 battles
11 hours ago, MajorRenegade said:

just open up a Sandbox server for Wows like how they did with the arty rework and 1.0 update in wot. This will allow us to mess around with a lot of things without messing with the supertest and live server.

 

enough said

Good idea. They could even go so far as to give CV players a dedicated (locked to keep the haters out) forum with a dedicated mod to discuss setups etc

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,491
[NSF]
Beta Testers
4,973 posts
5,679 battles
11 hours ago, Chobittsu said:

My solution to the problem:
Let the people who are paid to handle it handle it.

 

They haven’t been handling it though. The entire class has just been a rollercoaster of confusion since launch.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,068
[SIM]
Members
2,414 posts
4,049 battles
2 minutes ago, hipcanuck said:

Good idea. They could even go so far as to give CV players a dedicated (locked to keep the haters out) forum with a dedicated mod to discuss setups etc

A better idea would be to migrate all CVs to their own specific server. That cuts down on everyone’s salt, and spares CV players from having to deal with AA cruisers and battleships.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,259
[WOLF2]
Members
2,992 posts
5,204 battles
1 minute ago, SkaerKrow said:

A better idea would be to migrate all CVs to their own specific server. That cuts down on everyone’s salt, and spares CV players from having to deal with AA cruisers and battleships.

Better still, migrate people who can't handle CVs to tiers 1 and 2. Save some infrastructure costs.

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
456
[LUCK]
Members
1,274 posts
18,941 battles
8 hours ago, akh101 said:

clearly the point click adventure ship that is Graf Zeppelin show they really know what they are doing, and not like it just murders every thing it sees, and just make AA build ship point less.

Ummmmmmmmm, no. An AA spec Alabama murders the GZ planes - squadrons at a time. Pretty sure you'd get the same result wit an AA NC.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
141
Alpha Tester, Members, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
1,609 posts
3,807 battles
1 hour ago, Wye_So_Serious said:

Ummmmmmmmm, no. An AA spec Alabama murders the GZ planes - squadrons at a time. Pretty sure you'd get the same result wit an AA NC.

Sure that be great counter if only if people actually spec into it or even have her or if she doesn't lose most her AA to HE spamming cruisers or British BB  and proceeds get burn down to the keel or die by other means. You need more than one to effetely deal with it but even then they have to be with in AA range each other to do so

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
469
[QNA]
[QNA]
Members
1,838 posts
5,879 battles

 

 

Edited by Vangm94

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
456
[LUCK]
Members
1,274 posts
18,941 battles
19 minutes ago, akh101 said:

Sure that be great counter if only if people actually spec into it or even have her or if she doesn't lose most her AA to HE spamming cruisers or British BB  and proceeds get burn down to the keel or die by other means. You need more than one to effetely deal with it but even then they have to be with in AA range each other to do so

I don't do BBs much, usually AA cruisers, but have a 19pt I use on Alabama, NC and Mo. AA range is 7.2km with manual AA as well. I had the pleasure of GZ once and after 32 planes were lost he thought better of coming near me. Can't save everyone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,367
[HINON]
[HINON]
Beta Testers
5,913 posts
5,198 battles
On 4/4/2018 at 9:59 PM, IWantedOption1 said:

So did having more posts than battles

I work like 70 hours a week. It often becomes a choice of enjoying a game I like by reading about it and talking about it for 10 minutes before bed (or on down time at work) or being too tired to actually play the game competently. Plus, I joined this forum about 3 years before the game even existed. And I do like to dabble in other games, or watch a movie, or do something with my friends on occasion as well. Kind of tends towards more posts than battles after a few years. If you want to be a [edited] about it though... well I'm good at that too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×