Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Trollphoon

Which USN CA are you most excited for?

Which cruiser?   

111 members have voted

  1. 1. Which cruiser

    • T6 Pensacola
      9
    • T7 New Orleans
      5
    • T8 Baltimore
      6
    • T9 Buffalo
      18
    • T10 Des Moines
      7
    • T6 Dallas
      9
    • T7 Helena
      28
    • T8 Cleveland
      39
    • T9 Seattle
      11
    • T10 Worcester
      51

62 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,850
[AXANR]
Members
3,650 posts
23,502 battles
9 minutes ago, Trollphoon said:

#s***post

Just as an fyi, you may want to edit your entry to avoid getting moderated. Bypassing profanity filters is frowned upon by the mods. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
104 posts
435 battles
2 minutes ago, poeticmotion said:

Just as an fyi, you may want to edit your entry to avoid getting moderated. Bypassing profanity filters is frowned upon by the mods. 

The shiitake mushrooms that I feed my Ashitaka crew members with, as well as Nigerian football star Danny Shittu, may also agree with your statement. 

  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
563
[FOXEH]
[FOXEH]
Members
1,983 posts
3,253 battles
4 minutes ago, poeticmotion said:

Just as an fyi, you may want to edit your entry to avoid getting moderated. Bypassing profanity filters is frowned upon by the mods. 

Thank you mr. backseat moderator, otherwise we would have never known that.

 

By the way, your signature has more colours in it than this bag of M&Ms, might want to get that checked out.

  • Meh 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,850
[AXANR]
Members
3,650 posts
23,502 battles
4 minutes ago, HowitzerBlitzer said:

Thank you mr. backseat moderator, otherwise we would have never known that.

 

By the way, your signature has more colours in it than this bag of M&Ms, might want to get that checked out.

Meh, I don't really care, I was trying to help a dude out so he doesn't get banhammered. But I'm glad I gave you the opportunity to bolster your self-esteem with passive-aggressive statshaming. Clearly you need something to feel superior about. Never mind that your signature gave me an epileptic seizure. <3 you punkin!

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12,675
[SALVO]
Members
28,250 posts
43,858 battles
6 minutes ago, HowitzerBlitzer said:

Thank you mr. backseat moderator, otherwise we would have never known that.

 

By the way, your signature has more colours in it than this bag of M&Ms, might want to get that checked out.

Good for poetic.  Rules are rules.  People are all for telling everyone to not name and shame, and no one gives them crap for doing so.  And yet here's another forum rule, and you're giving Poetic crap for pointing this rule out to the OP.  I say, good for him.  I've done so myself and will continue to do so.  Intentionally misspelling obscenities to avoid text filters is ever bit as much of a forum rule as naming and shaming.    Not to mention stat shaming.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,850
[AXANR]
Members
3,650 posts
23,502 battles
1 minute ago, Trollphoon said:

Guys calm down... I was just trying to start a conversation about cruisers. 

If they return her to the way she used to be before she got nerfed down to tier 6, I am beyond excited for the return of Cleveland to tier 8. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
104 posts
435 battles
2 minutes ago, poeticmotion said:

If they return her to the way she used to be before she got nerfed down to tier 6, I am beyond excited for the return of Cleveland to tier 8. 

 

But how about Pensacola? It's going to be a butcher at tier 6. You're not excited for that at all? :(

Edited by Trollphoon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,850
[AXANR]
Members
3,650 posts
23,502 battles
Just now, Trollphoon said:

But how about Pensacola? It's going to be a butcher at tier 6. You're not excited for that at all? :(

I liked her at tier 7. Admittedly I'm a minority there, but the combination of nimbleness, troll bow armor and 10 tubes of freedom-delivering 203mm bald eagle launchers appealed to me. I am concerned about how badly they'll have to nerf her to put her at tier 6. I'm not going to get all doom and gloom about her before we see what happens to her, but I'm not going to get excited until we see it either because I don't see how they are going to balance Pensacola against other tier 6 cruisers without nerfs that seriously undermine her playability. 

They all have similar hp except for Nurnberg is pretty low. Armor is...well, they're tier 6 cruisers. Pensacola doesnt get torps but none of these ships are particularly torp heavy...Aoba gets 10km torps but only fires aft, La Gal gets decent 9km torps but only 3 per side, Leander's torps are good, but Nurn and Budyonny require you to be within suicide range to use. 

Aoba:  6 203mm guns, 10km torpedoes but the firing arc sucks. 

Leander: 8 152mm guns, AP only, smoke, good torps. 

Nurnberg: 9 155mm guns, 6km torps, fragile as a newborn duck made of glass perched on the edge of a cliff. 

La Galissonniere: Let's not even discuss this dumpster fire. La Gal is dead to me. 

Budyonny: 9 152mm railguns of firestarting doom, 4km torps.

Pensacola: 10 203mm guns, no torps. 

How do you balance Pensacola against the other tier 6 cruisers without such a severe nerf that it erodes her playability? I mean, you can drop her ROF to every 20 seconds...but that's going to make her not fun. You can raise her concealment back to pre-buff level of 15.7km...but then she gets deleted by every BB on the map. I am withholding judgment until I see what Wargaming does with her, but I know if I worked at WG and my boss told me "we're moving Pensacola to tier 6, it's your job to balance her without her being hilariously OP, but she still needs to be fun to play" I'd be so stumped that I'd leave the office early and go get hilariously drunk. 

If they leave Pensacola the way it is, she'll be a butcher. And I'll love it personally. But I don't think they'll leave her the way she is, and if they do she'll be so OP that they'll nerf her into oblivion within weeks of release. The only tier 6 cruisers on that list that would be even close to Pensacola, assuming two players of equal skill, are Leander and Budyonny. Aoba, Nurnberg, and La Gal would cease to exist as factors in tier 6 games. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,628
[PVE]
Members
10,633 posts
33,804 battles
52 minutes ago, poeticmotion said:

Nurnberg: 9 155mm guns, 6km torps, fragile as a newborn duck made of glass perched on the edge of a cliff. 

Budyonny: 9 152mm railguns of firestarting doom, 4km torps.

I had a different experience w/Nurnberg but fire starting was easier when I ran it up the line (lots of ship have become more fire resistant due to commander skills that didn't exist back then) used to stand on par w/Budyonny as a railgun of fire starting doom w/faster ROF...albeit better when going away from enemy as the double turrets are in the back but the double racks of torps made close encounters much more enjoyable. As for the glassy duck analogy that is more befitting of the Leander (as well as every other Brit CL...although the Fiji is just plane brutal w/insane maneuverability to make up for it)...If it wasn't for the smoke to hide in Leander would be an insta delete every battle (as well as all other Brit CLs).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,740
[SPTR]
Members
28,237 posts
21,955 battles

Pondering what the T6 Dallas is like would it be something to take into operations and that.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,563
[EQRN]
Members
2,440 posts
25,186 battles

Wish they would have made Brooklyn T7 and Helena a T7 premium.  Helena may not be as recognizable as Arizona, Bismarck or Yamato, but did have a pretty interesting career, starting with the Pearl Harbor attack, being called out by Tokyo Rose as a machine gun cruiser, first to fire proximity fuse AA shells, and figuring prominently in radar usage (or mis-usage) during some epic Guadalcanal battles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
1,100 posts
9,864 battles

Was excited to see the Worcester and the Helena, but starting to have the wind blown out of my sails hearing about the major nerds to the CA line. It looks like they’re really getting hammered with the test stats.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
543 posts
6,806 battles
7 hours ago, Crusin_Custard said:

Since Im at the Baltimore, Im a looking forward to the Buffalo

You will want to try to finished her if you can.  WG is very hit and miss these things and it could take them a while to sort it out if it's a miss.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17,819
[PVE]
Members
17,094 posts
41,190 battles
7 hours ago, Trollphoon said:

But how about Pensacola? It's going to be a butcher at tier 6. You're not excited for that at all? :(

I don't understand people who think Pensacola moving to T6 is some big change and that somehow going to T6 makes it a more powerful/better ship? Pensacola will see the EXACT same ships as a T6 it saw as a T7 with 1 exception = no T9's. So other than no longer seeing T9's the ship will see no change in MM tiers. T7 Pensacola sees T5/T6/T7/T8/T9. The down tiered T6 Pensacola will see T5/T6/T7/T8.

So how does this make it a butcher at T6? It will still see those same T5-T8 ships it always did but it will do so after having the nerf sledgehammer taken to it. The T6 Pensacola will actually be WORSE vs all the ships it will still see than it was facing those ships as it's current T7 self. I think a better way to say it would be  "it will be butchered as a T6".

And no I am not excited for it. It was a bad T7 that would have been a poor-mediocre T6 if moved as is. Now that they are nerf hammering it the ship will be even worse in the T6 version than it was as the T7. The only things that change with this downier are not seeing those T9's anymore and a big nerf to it's abilities. I don't see how it being a T6 suddenly makes it good? IMO it will actually be worse.

Not meant offensive. Just discussing your comment. :Smile_honoring:

Edited by AdmiralThunder

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17,819
[PVE]
Members
17,094 posts
41,190 battles
7 hours ago, Crusin_Custard said:

Since Im at the Baltimore, Im a looking forward to the Buffalo

Same here except am very disappointed to see the torps removed. THAT is what I really was looking forward to.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
237
[ICOP]
Members
1,079 posts
4,865 battles

Cleveland at T8, even though I could never play her properly at T6, just something about her design.

Edited by Junostorm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,471
[SALVO]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
6,610 posts
7,430 battles

Uparmored Minotaur with radar...YES PLEASE!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×