Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
Atanix

USS Alaska

7 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

439
[YAN]
Members
1,640 posts
7,466 battles
1 hour ago, Atanix said:

 no problem making this into a premium ship.

Actually, the discussion about how to put it into this game is one of the prime reasons it hasn't been introduced no doubt.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,262
[FOXEH]
Beta Testers
8,797 posts
15,210 battles
54 minutes ago, Akeno017 said:

Actually, the discussion about how to put it into this game is one of the prime reasons it hasn't been introduced no doubt.

I think it's more where than how; half the Forum wants it at tier 7 as a BB and the other half want it at tier 10 as a cruiser. I'm a cruiser/tier 10 guy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
302
[KNTAI]
[KNTAI]
Members
1,142 posts
6,015 battles

There's like a supertanker-ton of topics related to the Alaska class in the forum.

I want it too, but for now I leave it in the hands of WG developers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,792
[SALVO]
Members
17,050 posts
17,674 battles
1 hour ago, Umikami said:

I think it's more where than how; half the Forum wants it at tier 7 as a BB and the other half want it at tier 10 as a cruiser. I'm a cruiser/tier 10 guy.

Umi, I think that's what Akeno meant.  "How", "where", whatever.  I would only add that there's a newer third option.  A tier 9 FXP premium ship.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
439
[YAN]
Members
1,640 posts
7,466 battles
2 hours ago, Umikami said:

I think it's more where than how; half the Forum wants it at tier 7 as a BB and the other half want it at tier 10 as a cruiser. I'm a cruiser/tier 10 guy.

that is, as @Crucis what I meant. Im strongly of opinion that she fits best at T9/10 as a fxp cruiser. However I also think theres room for her to be placed at both, a quick Wikipedia search brings up 5 other potential candidates to put Alaska at T7, this could satisfy both sides of the argument with ease, although it would mean production of 2 separate ships instead of one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,792
[SALVO]
Members
17,050 posts
17,674 battles
6 minutes ago, Akeno017 said:

that is, as @Crucis what I meant. Im strongly of opinion that she fits best at T9/10 as a fxp cruiser. However I also think theres room for her to be placed at both, a quick Wikipedia search brings up 5 other potential candidates to put Alaska at T7, this could satisfy both sides of the argument with ease, although it would mean production of 2 separate ships instead of one.

I don't think that putting the Alaska at T7 settles a damned thing.  It'd be the wrong decision, IMO.  Putting her at tier 7 means that she'd be classified as a BB, which the Alaska absolutely is not.  It's not even a battlecruiser, though if WG added a BC "ship type" for MM, it'd be a lot closer to a BC than a BB, that's for sure.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×