Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
SmokinCAT

FIX THE MATCH MAKING.

29 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Members
592 posts
7,198 battles

Just finished a game that the MM decided to put the 4 DDs on our team made up of one T8 and 3 T7s up against a team of 5 DD which had the makeup of being 4 T8s and 1 T7.

 

There was a 5 total tier point different in the team makeups so the extra T8 DDs they got were not compensated with other T8 ships that would have balanced the tier points.

Out team had one T7 division and the two divisions on their team were made up of all T8 ships. 

 

This cannot keep happening to teams that are literally in a hole from the first tick of the clock in these matches.

 

WHY is this so hard to correct?

  • Boring 1
  • Angry 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
575
[KP]
Members
2,066 posts
22,094 battles

I would comment but would probably get another forum ban from somebody who doesn't even play the game. That sucks is all I got.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,477
[HINON]
Supertester
7,656 posts
8,120 battles

Those divisions are what screwed up that mm. The mm only takes into account the ship of the player who’s in charge of the division. Which is why you sometimes get fail disvions when someone in the division brings a ship that’s a tier lower than the ship the division lead is using.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
214
[O_O]
Members
806 posts
5,652 battles
37 minutes ago, warheart1992 said:

That and cruiser gameplay becoming less fun .... :Smile_sceptic:

Des Moines and I disagree with your opinion.

-R

Edited by Mister_Rawr
A large, drooling carnivore is behind you right now.
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,921
[OO7]
Members
6,060 posts
13,093 battles

OK, op, I have taken your suggestion to heart and have fixed mm for you as you have suggested. 

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
214
[O_O]
Members
806 posts
5,652 battles
31 minutes ago, IronMike11B4O said:

Don't forget HINDENBURG :)

I wouldn't know.  Yet.  At least Roon and I are having fun in the meantime!

-R

Edited by Mister_Rawr
But don't worry, it started dating a vegan last week so it's totally in the "trying to impress her" phase still.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,752
[YORHA]
Members
4,555 posts
8,738 battles

Cleveland would like a word  as well.

Edited by JCC45

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,819 posts

Players in divisions mess up the matchmaking for the entire team they are put on, and the stupider they are, the worse it is for the team they are put on. This is wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
214
[O_O]
Members
806 posts
5,652 battles
3 minutes ago, Kconvey_1 said:

Players in divisions mess up the matchmaking for the entire team they are put on, and the stupider they are, the worse it is for the team they are put on. This is wrong.

At the very least it means I get to maintain a pretty accurate list of clans I will not consider joining any time ever.

Though to be honest, I'm way too attached to the surprised face above my handle.  It would be nice to earn a Stalingrad one of these days though... damn my collector's instincts.

-R

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
1,169 posts
13,758 battles
1 hour ago, renegadestatuz said:

Those divisions are what screwed up that mm. The mm only takes into account the ship of the player who’s in charge of the division. Which is why you sometimes get fail disvions when someone in the division brings a ship that’s a tier lower than the ship the division lead is using.

Do you have proof of how this is working? Because it would be a bug, and should be reported. The way WARGAMING states the MM works, is that the highest tier member determines our match making bracket.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
592 posts
7,198 battles

You claim divisions are what screwed it up, well in no way should two divisions compiled of 5 T8 ships be on one team while the other team is finished with T7s. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
592 posts
7,198 battles
1 hour ago, Cpt_Cupcake said:

Do you have a screen shot for us?

Only post battle results, do you think I’m making this up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,477
[HINON]
Supertester
7,656 posts
8,120 battles
8 minutes ago, SkywhaleExpress said:

Do you have proof of how this is working? Because it would be a bug, and should be reported. The way WARGAMING states the MM works, is that the highest tier member determines our match making bracket.

Sorry, hadn’t had my coffee yet so my brain wasn’t functioning yet lol. What you said is correct. But the point still stands that the mm for disvions is based off of one ship and not all 3.

2 minutes ago, SmokinCAT said:

Only post battle results, do you think I’m making this up?

It’s not that he thinks you’re making it up, but if you’re going to claim something then you need to provide proof. Meaning a screenshot.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
592 posts
7,198 battles
3 minutes ago, Compassghost said:

Well, since divisions break matchmaking, it is likely a fail Division got uptiered.

What fail division? The T7s in a tier 9 game? That is pretty normal for T7 ships to see.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
1,169 posts
13,758 battles
9 minutes ago, renegadestatuz said:

Sorry, hadn’t had my coffee yet so my brain wasn’t functioning yet lol. What you said is correct. But the point still stands that the mm for disvions is based off of one ship and not all 3.

It’s not that he thinks you’re making it up, but if you’re going to claim something then you need to provide proof. Meaning a screenshot.

It would be interesting for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
1,169 posts
13,758 battles

However, I would love an answer to this, @Pigeon_of_War.....

 

Why do we still have off tier CVs in dual CV matches... OR BETTER YET, why the eff do we still have dual CVs? There's no way a Langley/Hosho can beat a Bogue/Zuiho... even worse is when a the latter two face tier 6 CVs. At least a Ryujo with 3 fighter groups can beat a Ranger... but loses to Saipain or similarly setup Hiryu... There's really no reason to not balance the tier of the CVs perfectly. Even if we have 2 CVs on a side, make them the same tier.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
575
[KP]
Members
2,066 posts
22,094 battles
2 hours ago, Mister_Rawr said:

I wouldn't know.  Yet.  At least Roon and I are having fun in the meantime!

-R

You are gonna love it.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
559
[-BRS-]
Members
1,955 posts
9,944 battles
3 hours ago, SmokinCAT said:

Only post battle results, do you think I’m making this up?

Nope, just curious. A picture is worth a thousand words...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,143
[WOLF9]
Privateers
11,937 posts
4,602 battles
4 hours ago, Mister_Rawr said:

A large, drooling carnivore is behind you right now.

No, she's sitting on my chest.

Ah.  Finally got down.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
214
[O_O]
Members
806 posts
5,652 battles
4 hours ago, iDuckman said:

No, she's sitting on my chest.

Ah.  Finally got down.

 

You... ehm... may wanna have someone take a look at that for you?

-R

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×