Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
GrimmeReaper

Make IJN CVs just as One Dimensional as the USN CVs

16 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

257
[TBOW]
Members
1,321 posts
10,951 battles

Okay you brought the Nerf Hammer against the USN, time to take it to the IJN.  Take away the AS loadout.  If the USN can't have it, the IJN line should not have it either.

  • Cool 5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
646 posts
796 battles

Yea I dunno what WG was thinking removing AS loadouts from USN but not IJN, especially considering the national "flavors", though it currently seems like those national flavors are either dogshirt or amazing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
801
[NG-NL]
Members
5,089 posts
8,410 battles

Not a bad idea while they try to figure out the CV rework.

 

AS is always a pain to play against anyway. Loathe it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
230
[WPP]
Members
611 posts
6,101 battles

Or just go in the total opposite direction - given then 12 squadrons (4-4-4) of Tier 4 planes.  That way they go nuts trying to manage ineffective flying trash.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
135
[ODIN]
[ODIN]
Members
456 posts
13,736 battles

Yet USN has higher hit points, larger squadrons, more ammo and whatever other benefits. The IJN makes up for it with either skill or mass in fighter on fighter gameplay.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
449
[MIA-A]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
2,073 posts
7,882 battles

Yea and give IJN more squads so they can be like USN and have both good air control and strike power instead of having to choose

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,454
[NMKJT]
Beta Testers
21,589 posts
3,884 battles

Can we just explore the concept of squadron parity instead of obsessing over hamstringing each other?

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
135
[ODIN]
[ODIN]
Members
456 posts
13,736 battles
Just now, KiyoSenkan said:

Can we just explore the concept of squadron parity instead of obsessing over hamstringing each other?

Exactly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,308
[FOXEH]
Beta Testers
8,888 posts
15,669 battles
51 minutes ago, Trumpetteer said:

No.  IJN is balance))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))

NOTHING about CVs is balanced.

5 minutes ago, KiyoSenkan said:

Can we just explore the concept of squadron parity instead of obsessing over hamstringing each other?

Apparently not, as players have been both screaming and begging for squadron parity for over 2 years, LOL!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,534
[NSF]
Beta Testers
5,020 posts
6,457 battles

Can we just remove CVs until WG actually takes the time out of their day to fix them?

 

Its just pathetic at this point. It’s being handled just as poorly as arty was in WoT. People laughed about that comparison two years ago, but now it’s all too true in terms of having an entire class that is either completely impotent, or incredibly broken.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,728
[5BS]
Members
4,926 posts
1 minute ago, Big_Spud said:

Can we just remove CVs until WG actually takes the time out of their day to fix them?

 

Its just pathetic at this point. It’s being handled just as poorly as arty was in WoT. People laughed about that comparison two years ago, but now it’s all too true in terms of having an entire class that is either completely impotent, or incredibly broken.

I still think my idea for a seperate game mode would work better; 1 Tier for CV's, with Fleet, Light, and Escort, with AI controlled destroyer/cruiser screens. Different CV's have different abilities, like Fleet have lower quality fighters but lots of them and TB/DB's while Lights have really good fighters and maybe DB's but no TB's and Escorts are super stealthy with TB's and Fighters and can separate from the group to launch strikes from odd directions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×