Jump to content
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
Ricky_Racer

ALABAMA IS OP even IN CO-OP & the BOT CV - "PLAYS POORLY"

17 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

42
[-V-]
Members
217 posts
808 battles

Do you think WG is trying to tell us something about the Alabama? "BUY - BUY"

5a763fd5002b0_CoOpAlabama.thumb.jpg.ac12c896ed32107f1a3596467a75c9e6.jpg

I decided to play Co - Op and was surprised to see our CV was lame.

I wanted to complain about the CV and give it a "PLAYS POORLY" (not an option) :Smile_teethhappy:

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,912 posts
2,492 battles

Oh look, another co-op unicum thread...

 

zzzZZZzzzzzz...

Edited by HowitzerBlitzer
  • Funny 1
  • Boring 1
  • Bad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,407 posts
2,202 battles

Nothing to do with the topic but since they're both USN BBs that start with A; in random games, is it natural to fear Arkansas Betas? 

Edited by Yoshiblue

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
664
[USCC2]
Members
3,428 posts

It's a BB, take a look at the stats from Tier V-X at both survival and damage; they're designed to be big damage dealers with durability as the majority of players are drawn to the game to play them.

 

You have to cater for your customer base.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
325
[SYN]
[SYN]
Members
1,322 posts
14,695 battles

 Personally I think it is bad form to complain about CVs in co-op as that is the only place to practice.  He might be trying to figure out manual drops, strafe, etc. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,056
[PVE]
[PVE]
Members
5,385 posts
10,165 battles
5 minutes ago, Warped_1 said:

 Personally I think it is bad form to complain about CVs in co-op as that is the only place to practice.  He might be trying to figure out manual drops, strafe, etc. 

The Op is just joking I believe. The CV was a BOT. Check the thread title again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42
[-V-]
Members
217 posts
808 battles
Just now, AdmiralThunder said:

The Op is just joking I believe. The CV was a BOT. Check the thread title again.

 

6 minutes ago, Warped_1 said:

 Personally I think it is bad form to complain about CVs in co-op as that is the only place to practice.  He might be trying to figure out manual drops, strafe, etc. 

Yeah...The Cv was a BOT. :Smile_smile:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,056
[PVE]
[PVE]
Members
5,385 posts
10,165 battles
26 minutes ago, Ricky_Racer said:

Do you think WG is trying to tell us something about the Alabama? "BUY - BUY"

5a763fd5002b0_CoOpAlabama.thumb.jpg.ac12c896ed32107f1a3596467a75c9e6.jpg

I decided to play Co - Op and was surprised to see our CV was lame.

I wanted to complain about the CV and give it a "PLAYS POORLY" (not an option) :Smile_teethhappy:

 

Alabama's AA is good for sure. All USN BB T7+ are though. My highs (in Co-op as well)...

  • Colorado - 38
  • North Carolina - 49
  • Alabama - 32
  • Iowa - 65
  • Missouri - 44
  • Montana - 54

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
325
[SYN]
[SYN]
Members
1,322 posts
14,695 battles

 Hey guys, a bot has got to learn too (there, now nobody will notice what an idiot I was).  :cap_hmm:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,056
[PVE]
[PVE]
Members
5,385 posts
10,165 battles
21 minutes ago, Warped_1 said:

 Hey guys, a bot has got to learn too (there, now nobody will notice what an idiot I was).  :cap_hmm:

Nah. If that simple mistake makes you an idiot then man what does it say about so many on this site. LOL

All good man don't sweat it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,123
[ARGSY]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
5,113 posts
18,633 battles

RWrDZOG.jpg

This was in ranked

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,056
[PVE]
[PVE]
Members
5,385 posts
10,165 battles
8 hours ago, Rat_Shot said:

y play  co-op ???????????????????????

y do you care?????????????????????????

y make an issue of it???????????????????????????????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
678
[MIA-A]
Members
1,971 posts
6,570 battles

I've been very pleasantly surprised by the quality of bot CV players in the few coop games I've played.

Dare I say that they are better than many human CVs in randoms??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,591
Members
17,786 posts
5,084 battles
8 hours ago, Rat_Shot said:

y play  co-op ???????????????????????

Why not type complete words?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,956
[PVE]
Members
8,859 posts
7,257 battles
15 hours ago, Ricky_Racer said:

Do you think WG is trying to tell us something about the Alabama? "BUY - BUY"

5a763fd5002b0_CoOpAlabama.thumb.jpg.ac12c896ed32107f1a3596467a75c9e6.jpg

I decided to play Co - Op and was surprised to see our CV was lame.

I wanted to complain about the CV and give it a "PLAYS POORLY" (not an option) :Smile_teethhappy:

 

:Smile_teethhappy:

There are times I would like to reports bots, but WG won't let us. I think it would be funny.

 

14 hours ago, Warped_1 said:

 Hey guys, a bot has got to learn too (there, now nobody will notice what an idiot I was).  :cap_hmm:

:Smile_teethhappy:

 

24 minutes ago, enderland07 said:

I've been very pleasantly surprised by the quality of bot CV players in the few coop games I've played.

Dare I say that they are better than many human CVs in randoms??

The bot CVs can be good and bad. When RNG gives you a good bot CV, they will cross drop on you. The will also stagger the attack so you will use your DC. They won't hover like a player would, but I have seen them take an off angle to make a little bit of a delay for the second squadron.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,056
[PVE]
[PVE]
Members
5,385 posts
10,165 battles
25 minutes ago, enderland07 said:

I've been very pleasantly surprised by the quality of bot CV players in the few coop games I've played.

Dare I say that they are better than many human CVs in randoms??

On the whole the bot CV's do pretty good BUT while most seem to be about average you see some real Tater bots thrown in. God help you if you get the Tater bot CV. They are really bad and if you get one you will know it. I had such a game a short while ago where the bot CV was being sunk by a Nagato and flew it's planes over it and off into the distance vs sinking the ship right there shooting it. They don't seem to try and evade incoming fire and torps as well as the red bot CV's do as a group either. I think they need a tweak to their coding. However, with that said, they play a lot better than the bot DD's do. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×