Jump to content
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
Ricky_Racer

SUNK BY A MACHINE GUN

12 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

42
[-V-]
Members
217 posts
808 battles

Ok. I know this was during a scenario, but ... I thought it was funny.

5a761673e2d85_MachineGun.thumb.jpg.1ee62fc259c1b0250a859f6663b470fc.jpg

  • Funny 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,943
[SYN]
Members
14,381 posts
10,260 battles

563ce3ea69855.image.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,382
[HINON]
[HINON]
Members
4,975 posts
6,462 battles

fitting name for that Atlanta, or any Atlanta for that matter

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42
[-V-]
Members
217 posts
808 battles
9 minutes ago, RipNuN2 said:

a9kL8f1.gif

This ... made me laugh ... :Smile_teethhappy:

I wonder why WG could make it possible and even think, machine guns could sink a USN Battleship.

Do they really believe this is possible? :Smile-_tongue:

Go figure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,746
[ARGSY]
Members
5,870 posts
4,001 battles
3 minutes ago, RedSeaBear said:

Qkr9uAV.gif

 

This one is most to the point, seeing as it's what naval Gatlings (and Nordenfelts, etc.) were developed for in the first place.

It would be fun to see an early pre-dreadnought with crows-nest anti-torpedo-boat Gatlings take on a squadron of low-tier bombers. I reckon you'd have to rate the Gatlings as having anti-aircraft capability. IIRC they were somewhere around .65 calibre and about 500rpm, with a solid slug, if anyone wants to try calculating DPS against known WOWS light weapons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×