Jump to content
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
WES_HoundDog

Where is the list WGing?

13 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Members
426 posts
8,340 battles

Where is the list that shows all of the ships and the total number of times each ship was played by players that have reached rank  #1?

 

When it was tier 7 it was 50% Belfasts and 30% Japenese destroyers.   Lets see what broken ships we have this tier.  Come on Wging don't be shy.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16
[BS]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
151 posts
5,763 battles
4 minutes ago, RipNuN2 said:

:cap_popcorn:


:Smile_hiding:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
414
[MIA-A]
[MIA-A]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
1,973 posts
7,641 battles

I don't have the stats but I can tell you it looks something like this:

1. Lo yang

2. Kutuzov

3. Akizuki or New Orleans or Amagi

 

Akizuki and New Orleans took the least amount of games to make rank 1.

 

LoYang and Kutuzov are very broken ships but their carrying power is significantly diminished because radar cruisers and the high DPM contesting DD akizuki exist. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
397
[R-F]
Members
664 posts
6,150 battles

Warships Today's stats, ranked battles, results over last two weeks*

*I know this season was more than two weeks, but the only sorting options are two weeks or All, and All includes previous seasons.

Win rates, top ships:

Enterprise 57.22%

Roma 53.55%

Kidd 52.31%

Akizuki 52.07%

Atago 51.88%

Lo Yang 51.43%

Amagi 51.35%

Kutuzov 51.35%

Chapayev 51.18%

Alabama 51.18%

Bismark 50.24%

Charles Martel 50.07%

 

All other ships below 50%.

Worst ships:

Ognevoi 46.71%

Hsienyang 45.99%

Lexington 45.92%

 

Not exactly the info you're looking for, but may be related.

Now... given that the top 6 ships, and 9 out of the 12 ships with winning records, are premium ships... is this evidence of Pay to Win in action?

Edited by Brhinosaurus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,118
[NDA]
Supertester
3,896 posts
1,472 battles
7 minutes ago, Brhinosaurus said:

Now... given that the top 6 ships, and 9 out of the 12 ships with winning records, are premium ships... is this evidence of Pay to Win in action?

Could just be due to always being able to put your 'best' captain in those premiums.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
397
[R-F]
Members
664 posts
6,150 battles

Another fun fact from wows-numbers: 6 players recorded more than 1,000 battles in Ranked Season 8. Naturally all of them had losing records.  One of them ranked out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,752 posts
7,967 battles
24 minutes ago, Brhinosaurus said:

Warships Today's stats, ranked battles, results over last two weeks*

*I know this season was more than two weeks, but the only sorting options are two weeks or All, and All includes previous seasons.

Win rates, top ships:

Enterprise 57.22%

Roma 53.55%

Kidd 52.31%

Akizuki 52.07%

Atago 51.88%

Lo Yang 51.43%

Amagi 51.35%

Kutuzov 51.35%

Chapayev 51.18%

Alabama 51.18%

Bismark 50.24%

Charles Martel 50.07%

 

All other ships below 50%.

Worst ships:

Ognevoi 46.71%

Hsienyang 45.99%

Lexington 45.92%

 

Not exactly the info you're looking for, but may be related.

Now... given that the top 6 ships, and 9 out of the 12 ships with winning records, are premium ships... is this evidence of Pay to Win in action?

I think there is a problem with the top 2.

Kidd is OP in a Carrier game but not at all in a non-Carrier game. It also loses to Akizuki in most circumstances.

Enterprise and Roma though are most likely an issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
414
[MIA-A]
[MIA-A]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
1,973 posts
7,641 battles
1 hour ago, CaptainTeddybear said:

I think there is a problem with the top 2.

Kidd is OP in a Carrier game but not at all in a non-Carrier game. It also loses to Akizuki in most circumstances.

Enterprise and Roma though are most likely an issue.

I have not seen any carriers from rank 10 to rank 1 except one game and that was a matchmaking abuser who intentionally threw for wins. Outside of CV games Kidd is just an overpowered Benson. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
108
[BAKED]
Members
918 posts
8,948 battles
9 hours ago, Brhinosaurus said:

Another fun fact from wows-numbers: 6 players recorded more than 1,000 battles in Ranked Season 8. Naturally all of them had losing records.  One of them ranked out.

that's a lot of games a day. Not sure how you even play that many games a day in 2-5. queues seemed to be decently long

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
397
[R-F]
Members
664 posts
6,150 battles
5 minutes ago, Dodgy_Cookies said:

that's a lot of games a day. Not sure how you even play that many games a day in 2-5. queues seemed to be decently long

For sure!

Tops is 1559 battles.  That's around 44 battles per day, every day, since the season started.  At a 47.34% win rate, he's reached rank 5.  Why on earth would you beat your head against the wall for that long?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
108
[BAKED]
Members
918 posts
8,948 battles
21 minutes ago, Brhinosaurus said:

For sure!

Tops is 1559 battles.  That's around 44 battles per day, every day, since the season started.  At a 47.34% win rate, he's reached rank 5.  Why on earth would you beat your head against the wall for that long?

Well I was looking at that list, and some of it gets interesting. One of the APOC guys took 700+ battles to get to rank1 despite being a 58% player in solo randoms. I guess they went on tilt or something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×