Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
galspanic

Cesare changes?

74 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Members
821 posts
6,988 battles

In the new patch notes it says:

Quote
  • Giulio Cesare: Reduced arming threshold for AP main gun shells to 53mm and for AP shells from secondary battery to 20mm

What does this mean?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
3,666 posts
8,087 battles
4 minutes ago, galspanic said:

In the new patch notes it says:

What does this mean?

It means that it takes less armor to arm the shell fuses. Makes it easier to get pens on BBs.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,471
[SALVO]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
6,610 posts
7,430 battles

I actually overpen BB's on an alarming regularity, so this is good...VERY good. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,267
[TFK]
[TFK]
Members
2,489 posts
25,083 battles

Anyone should get this ship for their port.  :Smile_great: You won't be disappointed.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39,481
[HINON]
Alpha Tester
27,858 posts
27,299 battles

Of all the ships in the game that need a small buff, Cesare isn't one.

  • Cool 9
  • Meh 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,471
[SALVO]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
6,610 posts
7,430 battles
1 minute ago, Lert said:

Of all the ships in the game that need a small buff, Cesare isn't one.

Shhhhhh don't tell anyone! 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
715 posts
4,574 battles
11 minutes ago, Lert said:

Of all the ships in the game that need a small buff, Cesare isn't one.

 

 

raw

Edited by MajorEnglush
  • Cool 1
  • Funny 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,043
[SALTY]
Members
8,932 posts
18,328 battles
15 minutes ago, Dr_Venture said:

I actually overpen BB's on an alarming regularity, so this is good...VERY good. 

Did Cesare really need a buff?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,478
[HINON]
Members
7,656 posts
9,539 battles
Just now, Ace_04 said:

Did Cesare really need a buff?

No. She’s one of the last ships that needed a buff. They honestly shouldn’t touch her anymore at this point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39,481
[HINON]
Alpha Tester
27,858 posts
27,299 battles
5 minutes ago, MajorEnglush said:

raw

Yes, because telling someone to shut up is preferable to upsetting the balance at the tier even more.

Cesare does not need a buff.

  • Cool 3
  • Funny 1
  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,140
[MCWF]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
7,026 posts
29,139 battles

She is just a poor little T5 BB. OK she outperforms any other T5 BB but that didn't mean she should not be buffed... (right, I own one too)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
119
[BBNS]
Beta Testers
397 posts
7,079 battles

She needs major buffs in all areas and made to be immune from fire

  • Cool 1
  • Funny 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
821 posts
6,988 battles
24 minutes ago, Fog_Repair_Ship_Akashi said:

It means that it takes less armor to arm the shell fuses. Makes it easier to get pens on BBs.

Ah.  That makes sense... except that it doesn't because:

18 minutes ago, Lert said:

Of all the ships in the game that need a small buff, Cesare isn't one.

 

When I play mine I feel like a rockstar, and I am anything but a rockstar at this game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
728
[KAPPA]
Members
2,104 posts
10,600 battles

This certainly helps her in the cruiser killing department. Not sure exactly how this will affect her vs. BBs, but I've seen enough overpens to lead me to believe this will be an outright (and un-needed) buff to her. The secondaries might be a bit more reliable on softer targets, but I'm almost the only one around that cares about AP secondaries anyways.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
3,666 posts
8,087 battles
2 minutes ago, galspanic said:

Ah.  That makes sense... except that it doesn't because:

 

When I play mine I feel like a rockstar, and I am anything but a rockstar at this game.

Hey it's Wargaming, who knows what is running through there heads.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,380
[JEDI-]
Members
2,839 posts
11,396 battles

An awesome little T5 just got more awesome. Glad i own one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,085
[WOLF2]
Beta Testers
4,720 posts
21 minutes ago, CaptHarlock_222 said:

This certainly helps her in the cruiser killing department. Not sure exactly how this will affect her vs. BBs, but I've seen enough overpens to lead me to believe this will be an outright (and un-needed) buff to her. The secondaries might be a bit more reliable on softer targets, but I'm almost the only one around that cares about AP secondaries anyways.

Her AP secondaries actually do fairly well.

I hate to say it, but GC probably didn't need this buff.  Maybe they're just trying to get her firmly in the OP camp so fewer will complain when they ban her.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
173
[COB45]
Members
1,011 posts
3,482 battles

I mean the caesar is good and all but IMO the Konig is the better tier V BB for these reasons

-she has a hard time being cittideled

-for the same accuracy and sigma you have a better concentration of shells if you can get the back turrets in play

-she has a faster reload and only slightly less damage on the AP and has 1/4 HE pen

-all for about the same shell velocity

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
2,589 posts
8,799 battles
1 hour ago, Lert said:

Of all the ships in the game that need a small buff, Cesare isn't one.

Shh, don't tell them that. They might buff Khab next if they don't realize it doesn't need any help. 

And I love my Khab. :Smile_trollface:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×