Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
atPrick__

So why you hate Destroyers Wargaming?

54 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

102
[TF-64]
Members
594 posts
24,377 battles

Need a lot more to go off of. DD play has changed a lot since the beginning. Adaption has become the norm. I still find them the most enjoyable to play. So tell at least some general concerns or something. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
3,043 posts
10,248 battles

Sorry m8, but this is one of those threads that deserves a "git gud"-flavored response.

On the other hand, if you would like to reply to my post with an argument to back up your point, then I would be more than happy to take it under consideration and respond with thoughts of my own.

Until then...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
833 posts
12,757 battles

Going to assume it has to do with the recent campaign having missions that require Cruisers and Battleships, but not Destroyers. It has altered MM at the lower tiers somewhat based on my personal non-scientific, insignificant experience.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
3,062 posts
25,660 battles
1 hour ago, OstwindFlakpanzer said:

WG loves destroyers.  gives them all a bunch of unrealistic crap just to keep them alive.  be happy you get what you get.

Sorry please explain this to me? Define unrealistic crap?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,394
[REVY]
Members
9,709 posts
7,317 battles
7 hours ago, atPrick__ said:

Just wondering.

 

 

Clearly they don't since WGing thinks they can take on Battleships 1 on 1.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,882 posts
20,870 battles
2 hours ago, RiverTheIdiot said:

Sorry please explain this to me? Define unrealistic crap?

How about unlimited torpedo reloads for ships that carried at most a couple salvos. :Smile-_tongue:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,116
[BOSS]
Beta Testers
2,762 posts
16,883 battles

I have taken a break from the forums this year, because of nonsense DD whining like this post and some of the responses in it. 

 

I see nothing has changed..  >sigh<

 

  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
3,062 posts
25,660 battles
51 minutes ago, CrazyHorse_Denver said:

How about unlimited torpedo reloads for ships that carried at most a couple salvos. :Smile-_tongue:

So your saying???? You would rather just have destroyers ramming other ships since thats the only good thing they will be good at for most of them (not all)

  • Meh 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,287
[WG-CC]
-Members-, Members
9,101 posts
8,050 battles
8 hours ago, OstwindFlakpanzer said:

WG loves destroyers.  gives them all a bunch of unrealistic crap just to keep them alive.  be happy you get what you get.

You mean the unhistorical team compositions, where we would otherwise see 4-8 Destroyers per Battleship? Suuuuure that would make life for BBs much easier

  • Meh 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,974
[-K--]
Beta Testers
4,841 posts
14,895 battles

Whats wrong with DD's ?

 

 

IJN DD's can be amazing.   Shima = amazebote

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
211
[MKF]
Members
584 posts
20,416 battles
13 hours ago, atPrick__ said:

Just wondering.

 

 

MY DDs play just fine. Not sure what your problem is

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
12,692 posts
14,320 battles

Wargaming hates Destroyers!?!? Lol that's news to me considering last few months they have added and removed content making DDs increasingly favorable...

AP Bombs don't really do much on DDs.

Deep Water Torps were added that target BBs and can't touch DDs.

Need I continue?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×