Jump to content
You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.
BlailBlerg

Concealment buff to Mahan?

Concealment buff to Mahan  

29 members have voted

  1. 1. poll


15 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

442
[FAE]
Members
2,242 posts
2,770 battles

T7 DDs are in a tough spot due to T8 getting the concealment module. And T7 DDs tend tohave the worst base concealment. 

Could the Mahan pretty please get a concealment reduction? It'll still be easily spotted, but at least it wont be gimped. Its a crazy fun ship for pre-planning and torp drops. 

Blyska really could use something to do if she gets hurt. There's really no fun in playing gunboat in the post-bloom game. 

I hear Akatsuki is hurt by the same issue. 

Shiratsuyu does fine atm, but its super frustrating and I'm never touching it again. Not having smoke is ridiculous. 

Don't really have much info on the T7 VMF and KM. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14
[T-SEC]
[T-SEC]
Members
121 posts
5,241 battles

I sold mine she is to easy to spot. Then all guns are on you... Much like being in a Cleveland. For some reason do much better in Benson... Farragut is. meh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
4,932 posts
5,713 battles

Only if Akatsuki gets a concealment buff at the same time. Max concealment of 6.44km in Akatsuki isn't anywhere near comfortable for and IJN DD. She's just a tad too visible, it needs to be closer to 6.0km when concealment is maxed out.

Edit: If I'm recalling correctly, Mahan's concealment when maxed out isn't that far off from Akatsuki, so any buff to Mahan's concealment would make her stealthier than Akatsuki.

Edited by GhostSwordsman

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,410
[CUTE]
Supertester
4,100 posts
4,179 battles

IMO Mahan, along with other tier 7 DDs, got a concealment buff with the commander skill changes to make CE a 4 point skill

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,196
[SALT]
Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
3,660 posts
2,878 battles
11 minutes ago, GhostSwordsman said:

Only if Akatsuki gets a concealment buff at the same time. Max concealment of 6.44km in Akatsuki isn't anywhere near comfortable for and IJN DD. She's just a tad too visible, it needs to be closer to 6.0km when concealment is maxed out.

Edit: If I'm recalling correctly, Mahan's concealment when maxed out isn't that far off from Akatsuki, so any buff to Mahan's concealment would make her stealthier than Akatsuki.

Mahan's concealment with CE and camo is 6.9km. Shiratsuyu with CE is 5.8km. In all honestly Akatsuki would be fine going down to 6.2 max, Mahan at 6.6 max to make them far more comfortable with the post gunnery changes.

As for Maass and Minsk I can't really speak on those two. Maass does have an advantage with faster torpedo's than Mahan as well as Hydro but Mahan has better smoke. Due to Maass having a 7.7 base vs Mahan's 7.9 base it's fair to say that even with Mahan's reduction Maass would still be close in concealment with CE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
1,089 posts
14,110 battles
2 hours ago, BlailBlerg said:

Not having smoke is ridiculous

Smoke or no smoke is your choice.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
224
[ZR]
WoWS Wiki Editor
581 posts
5,026 battles

No, the T7 DDs are fine. They have enough tools to excel in matches even if they get uptiered.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34
[MIA-A]
Members
178 posts
6,835 battles

While it is slightly annoying to get spotted that far out, you do still wreck DDs who do get spotted by you - at least lower and equal tier ships and IJN DDs.

You also shouldn't be contesting a cap with a higher tier DD like a Z-23 or Benson... and you shouldn't be charging into anyone with support or are a larger ship that are undistracted - maybe *slight* buff but nothing too extreme like T8 slot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,328
[FOXEH]
Beta Testers
8,932 posts
15,675 battles
On ‎11‎/‎27‎/‎2017 at 6:51 AM, mrmariokartguy said:

No, the T7 DDs are fine. They have enough tools to excel in matches even if they get uptiered.

I disagree with this; in my experience tier 7 DD's regularly get waffle-stomped by higher tier DD's.

20 hours ago, 901234 said:

While it is slightly annoying to get spotted that far out, you do still wreck DDs who do get spotted by you - at least lower and equal tier ships and IJN DDs.

Leningrad, Blys, and Maass can all wax a Mahan, quickly and easily.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
442
[FAE]
Members
2,242 posts
2,770 battles

Mahan really does not need to be this outlier in a soft stat that's made up by WG anyway. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,683 posts
7,756 battles
On 11/27/2017 at 6:23 AM, MQ1hunter said:

I sold mine she is to easy to spot. Then all guns are on you... Much like being in a Cleveland. For some reason do much better in Benson... Farragut is. meh

Bensons detection gets down to about 6 IIRC. It’s a world of difference. 

 

Farragut and Mahan could both use a small buff to detection, but then the IJN would need small buffs too.

 

The problem is that USN guns don’t work well at all beyond about 7 km, so USN DDs need to get close to do their job.  As long as they are detected farther than 6km, they should be good. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
488
[STAR]
Members
2,736 posts
8,003 battles

The problem are t7 DDs overall, not only Mahan. All t7 DDs have bad concealment values. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
146
[-WTP-]
[-WTP-]
Members
596 posts
5,973 battles
On 12/8/2017 at 0:39 PM, AnimaL21 said:

if mahan gets a detection buff, then surely Sims should as well.   

Yes please

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×