Jump to content
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
Erebthoron

So the Colorado will get some buffs

40 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,252
[ARGSY]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
5,382 posts
19,399 battles

Sea Group leaked some changes for the upcomming patch.

Colorado Hitpoint on B Hull increased from 50100 to 59300, and no change to her Repair Party. Her main gun accuracy is adjusted to 1.9σ from 1.8σ (Hull A) and 2.0σ(Hull B), respectively.

Since I got already 2 warnings for linking sea-group stuff just google for that org

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,128
[NDA]
Supertester
4,907 posts
14,285 battles

This information was released on the WoWs Dev Blog over on Facebook this morning. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23,498
[HINON]
Supertester
19,535 posts
13,126 battles
24 minutes ago, Pope_Shizzle said:

It's sigma is nerfed from 2.0 to 1.9.  

Honestly, I'm not sure that will even be noticable. The HP buff definitely will, and it's long needed.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,977
[-K-]
Supertester
3,119 posts
6,972 battles
15 minutes ago, Lert said:

Honestly, I'm not sure that will even be noticable. The HP buff definitely will, and it's long needed.

 

I agree.  I wish they would just give her the West Virginia 1944 refit and be done with it.  But this is a good start.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,425
[HINON]
Supertester
7,546 posts
7,672 battles
43 minutes ago, Erebthoron said:

Sea Group leaked some changes for the upcomming patch.

Colorado Hitpoint on B Hull increased from 50100 to 59300, and no change to her Repair Party. Her main gun accuracy is adjusted to 1.9σ from 1.8σ (Hull A) and 2.0σ(Hull B), respectively.

Since I got already 2 warnings for linking sea-group stuff just google for that org

 

Well it was officially announced on the dev blog, so post it from the dev blog

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23,498
[HINON]
Supertester
19,535 posts
13,126 battles
5 minutes ago, Pope_Shizzle said:

I wish they would just give her the West Virginia 1944 refit and be done with it.

Maybe if this HP buff doesn't get her in line, though I doubt they'll ever give the tech tree Colorado the WV refit. Probably introduce that at some point as premium.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
539
[-GS-]
Beta Testers
1,896 posts
19,305 battles
5 minutes ago, Lert said:

Maybe if this HP buff doesn't get her in line, though I doubt they'll ever give the tech tree Colorado the WV refit. Probably introduce that at some point as premium.

That would be nice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
187
Beta Testers
715 posts
3,660 battles
2 minutes ago, Eric_Von_Hess said:

That would be nice

Seconded.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,683 posts
7,756 battles
32 minutes ago, Lert said:

Maybe if this HP buff doesn't get her in line, though I doubt they'll ever give the tech tree Colorado the WV refit. Probably introduce that at some point as premium.

They'd need to rework CVs completely before putting that many 5”/38s on a tier 7 BB. There is just too much difference in AA DPS and in aircraft survivability from one tier to he next, and that level of AA on a ship that sees tier 5 would be murder. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,530
[NSF]
Beta Testers
5,018 posts
6,449 battles
1 minute ago, inktomi19d said:

They'd need to rework CVs completely before putting that many 5”/38s on a tier 7 BB. There is just too much difference in AA DPS and in aircraft survivability from one tier to he next, and that level of AA on a ship that sees tier 5 would be murder. 

 

*COUGH*LYON*COUGH*GNEISENAU*COUGH*

 

A lot of the issue stems from the immense mid range AA damage. If WG really needs to remove some of the quad Bofors or replace them with twins, they can. Wymoning (Arkansas in reality), New York and New Mexico also all have fantasy AA fitouts as well (for questionable reasons at this point in time). Arizona also has her planned AA and radar refit, not what she sank with in 1941.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,920 posts
1,365 battles
48 minutes ago, Lert said:

Maybe if this HP buff doesn't get her in line, though I doubt they'll ever give the tech tree Colorado the WV refit. Probably introduce that at some point as premium.

They probably havent done that yet, because they know as soon as they do, the Colorado will never again be played. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
583
[-SYN-]
Members
2,749 posts
8,747 battles
9 minutes ago, inktomi19d said:

They'd need to rework CVs completely before putting that many 5”/38s on a tier 7 BB. There is just too much difference in AA DPS and in aircraft survivability from one tier to he next, and that level of AA on a ship that sees tier 5 would be murder. 

T5 CV's have protected MM, they don't ever see anything higher than a T6. The lowest Tier CV's that see T7 ships is the T6 CV's.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,425
[HINON]
Supertester
7,546 posts
7,672 battles
11 minutes ago, ryuukei8569 said:

T5 CV's have protected MM, they don't ever see anything higher than a T6. The lowest Tier CV's that see T7 ships is the T6 CV's.

This is wrong. Tier 5 CVs can see tier 7 ships. They can also meet tier 7 CVs as well. Had a match in my Bogue with a friendly tier 7 CV as well and the red team had a tier 5 CV and a Saipan. Tier 5 CVs do not have protected mm. I see tier 7 ships quite frequently while in my Bogue. So no clue where you’re getting this from.

 

@Doomlock has the picture proof.

Edited by renegadestatuz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
556
[CVA16]
Members
2,754 posts
6,652 battles

Tell you what. This ship with a good captain, upgrades and the right signals is tough to beat. Just my opinion though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,493
[GREPT]
[GREPT]
Beta Testers
6,739 posts
7,309 battles
24 minutes ago, inktomi19d said:

They'd need to rework CVs completely before putting that many 5”/38s on a tier 7 BB. There is just too much difference in AA DPS and in aircraft survivability from one tier to he next, and that level of AA on a ship that sees tier 5 would be murder. 

Too late, go look at the tier 7 german BB, then consider the fact all those guns the gneis has makes her AA better than what the USN 5 inchers. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,712
[HINON]
Modder, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers, WoWS Wiki Editor
6,499 posts
3,787 battles
14 minutes ago, ryuukei8569 said:

T5 CV's have protected MM, they don't ever see anything higher than a T6. The lowest Tier CV's that see T7 ships is the T6 CV's.

ajM8CyJ.png

You can see in this image, that a T7 Ranger (allied), and a Saipan (enemy) are in this match. This was played a few months ago, but it still is correct as no MM changes have happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,251 posts
737 battles
27 minutes ago, inktomi19d said:

They'd need to rework CVs completely before putting that many 5”/38s on a tier 7 BB. There is just too much difference in AA DPS and in aircraft survivability from one tier to he next, and that level of AA on a ship that sees tier 5 would be murder. 

Lyon and Gneisenau currently takes huge steaming dumps on the Colorado's AA. In fact, the Gneisenau's AA can easily be competitive even at tier 8.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
583
[-SYN-]
Members
2,749 posts
8,747 battles
18 minutes ago, renegadestatuz said:

This is wrong. Tier 5 CVs can see tier 7 ships. They can also meet tier 7 CVs as well. Had a match in my Bogue with a friendly tier 7 CV as well and the red team had a tier 5 CV and a Saipan. Tier 5 CVs do not have protected mm. I see tier 7 ships quite frequently while in my Bogue. So no clue where you’re getting this from.

 

@Doomlock has the picture proof.

 

10 minutes ago, Doomlock said:

ajM8CyJ.png

You can see in this image, that a T7 Ranger (allied), and a Saipan (enemy) are in this match. This was played a few months ago, but it still is correct as no MM changes have happened.

As long as the T5 Cv is not in a division, it will never see T7's.

 

nAMUQ0V.png

 

Here is the official matchmaking chart. However divisioning, even with other T5's, will cause a Cv's matchmaking to become the same as a non CV's, MM. Its the same as if you have people divisioning from different tiers. Matchmaking always looks at the highest tier available for a division, never the lowest. But, undivisoned T5 Cv's will not see T7's.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,338
[-K-]
Supertester
5,179 posts
9,036 battles
32 minutes ago, Ghostdog1355 said:

Tell you what. This ship with a good captain, upgrades and the right signals is tough to beat. Just my opinion though.

 

That's true of any ship. Good players can make terrible ships work... doesn't mean the ship itself isn't terrible. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,920 posts
1,365 battles
1 hour ago, Ghostdog1355 said:

Tell you what. This ship with a good captain, upgrades and the right signals is tough to beat. Just my opinion though.

Its a SOLID troll ship, the AI do that all the time with it.  Get one in T6 and it will wreck all your T6 BBs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,898
[YORHA]
Members
3,531 posts

So if people want to find out for themselves log into the PTS tomorrow.  The Colorado is there with it's new 53,900 hit point total and, I assume, sigma.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
556
[CVA16]
Members
2,754 posts
6,652 battles

I'd take the Colorado into any tier 7 battle. Period, She's slow but hits with accuracy like a sledge hammer and takes punishment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×