Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Aorangi

A few balance questions

8 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

9
[NFE]
Members
95 posts
4,746 battles

I have been mulling some ideas over and I wanted some feedback on how they would affect the overall balance of the game.

1: The Kolberg either getting a reworked B hull or a C hull that includes a gun upgrade from the 105 MM to the 150 MM and torpedoes, similar to the stock torpedoes on the Karlsruhe.

2: Giving the North Carolina, Alabama, Iowa, Missouri, and Montana access to a variant of the Defensive Fire consumable that only affects the Oerlikons and Bofors.

3: Giving the Izumo a 360 degree rotation on the central turret.

4: Also to combat higher fire chances that some ships have, what about reducing the cool-down on the Damage Control party?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,656
[-K-]
Members
8,491 posts
14,883 battles

You'd be surprised how much more effective Kolberg becomes with IFHE and Demolition Expert.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
791
[GGWP]
Beta Testers
2,180 posts
10,511 battles
17 minutes ago, Aorangi said:

I have been mulling some ideas over and I wanted some feedback on how they would affect the overall balance of the game.

1: The Kolberg either getting a reworked B hull or a C hull that includes a gun upgrade from the 105 MM to the 150 MM and torpedoes, similar to the stock torpedoes on the Karlsruhe.

2: Giving the North Carolina, Alabama, Iowa, Missouri, and Montana access to a variant of the Defensive Fire consumable that only affects the Oerlikons and Bofors.

3: Giving the Izumo a 360 degree rotation on the central turret.

4: Also to combat higher fire chances that some ships have, what about reducing the cool-down on the Damage Control party?

1.) Get IFHE and DE on your captain

2.) Not needed

3.) Honestly wont change the Izumo that much

4.) Not needed. Setting fires in the main way ligher ships like DDs and CLs deal with the big battleships. The last thing we need is to buff BBs even more

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,275
[RLGN]
Members
14,939 posts
26,466 battles
23 minutes ago, Ace_04 said:

You'd be surprised how much more effective Kolberg becomes with IFHE and Demolition Expert.

 

St Louis as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,365
[HINON]
[HINON]
Beta Testers
5,913 posts
5,644 battles

Can I just ask, out of curiosity, how many people do you expect to play Kolberg with a 10 point captain? Keep in mind that the vast, vast, vast majority of people don't get a 10 point captain until tier 7 or tier 8...

 

If there are 50 people on NA with a 10 point Kolberg captain, without retaining one from something high tiered just to give me the finger, I would be surprised. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
828
[KIA-T]
Members
2,237 posts
9,838 battles
46 minutes ago, Aorangi said:

2: Giving the North Carolina, Alabama, Iowa, Missouri, and Montana access to a variant of the Defensive Fire consumable that only affects the Oerlikons and Bofors.

 

We don't need more aa buffs, especially on ships that hit carriers hard enough as thry do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
631 posts
6,030 battles

Changing the middle turret on the Izumo won't change too much, as the number 1 and 3 turrets will still behave the same. All it does is mean that 1/3 of your firepower is able to transition to the other side of the ship quicker than the 1 and 3 turrets.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×