195 Vulgarr WoWS Community Contributors 309 posts Report post #1 Posted October 16, 2017 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
632 [GUYS] TabbyHopkins Alpha Tester 2,726 posts 3,865 battles Report post #2 Posted October 16, 2017 The "JOO-leo Ches-R-aye" I guess..... Italian is such a weird language with the "C"s. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,148 [O_O] Khafni Members 3,953 posts 17,920 battles Report post #3 Posted October 16, 2017 Nice review. I am most interested in your fun factor rating of 4. I want to sail 'fun' ships and don't keep ones that aren't fun. How did you build out the captain? I heard you say you didn't use Superintendent but what would you recommend? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
897 [MIA-I] vonKaiser Supertester 2,896 posts 5,614 battles Report post #4 Posted October 16, 2017 When/if I finally get my hands on her, she's just gonna be the Julius Cesar whenever I do my reviews Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
195 Vulgarr WoWS Community Contributors 309 posts Report post #5 Posted October 16, 2017 10 hours ago, Khafni said: Nice review. I am most interested in your fun factor rating of 4. I want to sail 'fun' ships and don't keep ones that aren't fun. How did you build out the captain? I heard you say you didn't use Superintendent but what would you recommend? Currently this is the build I am using with it. making use of the AA guns and the ability to switch back and forth from HE to AP quickly. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
702 [UFFA] SparvieroVV Beta Testers 3,749 posts 4,674 battles Report post #6 Posted October 16, 2017 (edited) 12 hours ago, TabbyHopkins said: The "JOO-leo Ches-R-aye" I guess..... Italian is such a weird language with the "C"s. All you have to know is every rule involving c, cc, ch, cch. How is that hard? Next lesson dialect variations. Also the giu portion of Giulio is a bit more subtle than a German spotting a Hebrew in 1939 Poland. Edited October 16, 2017 by SparvieroVV Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
87 TheHunter2_EAD Beta Testers 844 posts 7,192 battles Report post #7 Posted October 17, 2017 Definite buy for me. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
315 geser98 Members 1,326 posts 95 battles Report post #8 Posted October 17, 2017 Waiting for this ship to come out. Seems like it's going to be a T5 Scharnhorst and then it would be worth every penny. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 leopard1a Beta Testers 11 posts 5,171 battles Report post #9 Posted October 17, 2017 No ship today. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
702 [UFFA] SparvieroVV Beta Testers 3,749 posts 4,674 battles Report post #10 Posted October 17, 2017 At best it will be Friday. Don’t expect the current level of oxygen stored in your lungs to be a sufficient amount to last until the ship goes on sale. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
0 leopard1a Beta Testers 11 posts 5,171 battles Report post #11 Posted October 17, 2017 I have checked the history of released ships. 40% (round about) were released on tuesdays, 40% were released on thursdays and the rest is monday and friday. Edit: Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
7,921 [WOLF3] HazeGrayUnderway Members 22,444 posts 20,530 battles Report post #12 Posted October 17, 2017 Looks to be a Better Kongo than Kongo herself. Too bad MM sh*ts on Tier V. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
487 [RKN] MutsuKaiNi Members 328 posts 10,811 battles Report post #13 Posted October 20, 2017 ^ My thoughts exactly, she looks really fun and I want her but T5MM is horrendous, same issue I have with Gangut, good ship, bad tier. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
33 [CWM] dust340man Members 461 posts 14,872 battles Report post #14 Posted October 28, 2017 (edited) I bought the Cesare a few hours ago for $24.99 but work out of town so won't get to play her till Monday. Tier 5 BB's can do fine even when up tiered and this one has everything it needs to excel as a Tier 5 BB. She has excellent speed for a Tier 5 BB so it will add to the fun of playing her. Edited October 28, 2017 by dust340man Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
575 [-GPS-] Landing_Skipper Members 2,873 posts 32,108 battles Report post #15 Posted October 28, 2017 On 10/17/2017 at 5:38 PM, HazeGrayUnderway said: Looks to be a Better Kongo than Kongo herself. Too bad MM sh*ts on Tier V. She doesn't feel the same as Kongo. Significantly more agile in terms of rudder shift, rate of turn and turning circle. It's been a long time since I played Kongo, but Giulio Cesare's guns don't feel as accurate and the AP doesn't hit as hard at distance. However, the HE fire chance is 35%. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
195 Vulgarr WoWS Community Contributors 309 posts Report post #16 Posted October 28, 2017 (edited) On 10/28/2017 at 1:01 AM, Landing_Skipper said: She doesn't feel the same as Kongo. Significantly more agile in terms of rudder shift, rate of turn and turning circle. It's been a long time since I played Kongo, but Giulio Cesare's guns don't feel as accurate and the AP doesn't hit as hard at distance. However, the HE fire chance is 35%. Swap out your 2nd module for aiming systems and she's more like the first test version of the ship. A lot more accurate and deadly. Edited October 29, 2017 by Vulgarr Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
702 [UFFA] SparvieroVV Beta Testers 3,749 posts 4,674 battles Report post #17 Posted October 28, 2017 I have the accuracy module and I still wouldn’t claim the ship is accurate. Every now and then RNG applies 1.9 sigma at salvos below 10k. That’s still enough to get a 60k average so I’m not complaining. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
575 [-GPS-] Landing_Skipper Members 2,873 posts 32,108 battles Report post #18 Posted October 29, 2017 20 hours ago, Vulgarr said: Swap out your 2nd module for target acquisition and she's more like the first test version of the ship. A lot more accurate and deadly. 20 hours ago, SparvieroVV said: I have the accuracy module and I still wouldn’t claim the ship is accurate. Every now and then RNG applies 1.9 sigma at salvos below 10k. That’s still enough to get a 60k average so I’m not complaining. I run Aiming System Mod 1 on virtually every BB, with the exception of Bismarck, Tirpitz, and high Tier USN BBs which have access to a special accuracy module. Giulio Cesare isn't very accurate. The Konig was accurate when it had 2.0 Sigma. This isn't it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
195 Vulgarr WoWS Community Contributors 309 posts Report post #19 Posted October 29, 2017 (edited) 8 hours ago, Landing_Skipper said: I run Aiming System Mod 1 on virtually every BB, with the exception of Bismarck, Tirpitz, and high Tier USN BBs which have access to a special accuracy module. Giulio Cesare isn't very accurate. The Konig was accurate when it had 2.0 Sigma. This isn't it. Yeah originally when we were testing it, the 1st version of the ship had a dispersion of only 138 meters. It was laser accurate. Most of the time if you fired at a broadside target with all 10 guns, you'd get 9 penetrations. It was devastating. So many of us CC's and testers alike advised a slight nerf to the guns or else everyone in the game would have full blown deletion machines and tier 4/5 would be pretty much dead. So the dispersion was increased to make it less OP and I think it works. However for players that want a taste of what that 1st version was like, the aiming systems module gets you close. Edited October 29, 2017 by Vulgarr Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
702 [UFFA] SparvieroVV Beta Testers 3,749 posts 4,674 battles Report post #20 Posted October 29, 2017 138 to 226 and German dispersion is a slight downgrade? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
195 Vulgarr WoWS Community Contributors 309 posts Report post #21 Posted October 29, 2017 5 hours ago, SparvieroVV said: 138 to 226 and German dispersion is a slight downgrade? Oh I didn't say the nerf was slight, I said we asked for a slight nerf. lol Big difference in what was requested and what was delivered. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
