Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Phoenix_jz

A question about the USN 8"/55 Mk.14

7 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

2,712
[HINON]
Privateers, In AlfaTesters
7,595 posts
2,105 battles

Hello all; just a quickie here.

 

Does anyone have a source that states the USN 8"/55 Mk.14 fired it's HE at 823mps (2700 ft/s)?

 

I've been looking, but I've only ever seen 853mps (2800 ft/s) referenced in general for the gun, and the aforementioned lower value only for later guns that used SHS as AP (at 762mps or 2500 ft/s).

 

Thanks!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,503
[SYN]
Members
15,331 posts
12,175 battles

They didn't?

8"/55 Mark 14 fires at 853mps
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_8-55_mk9.php

8"/55 Mark 12 and 15 fires at 823mps
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_8-55_mk12-15.php

 

Of particular note is that Mark 12 and 15 are built to lighter specifications.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,712
[HINON]
Privateers, In AlfaTesters
7,595 posts
2,105 battles
2 minutes ago, MrDeaf said:

They didn't?

8"/55 Mark 14 fires at 853mps
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_8-55_mk9.php

8"/55 Mark 12 and 15 fires at 823mps
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WNUS_8-55_mk12-15.php

 

Of particular note is that Mark 12 and 15 are built to lighter specifications.

 

That's what I'm trying to figure out. I've never seen the Mk.14 quoted as firing it's shells, AP and HE, at anything other than 853mps.  Later guns are where the varying between velocity begins depending on ammunition.

 

Yet for some reason in-game, the Mk.14 fires it's HE at 823mps instead of 853mps, which causes it's time to target to be be significantly longer than that of the AP.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
332
Members
1,195 posts

the Mk 12, 14 and 15 all have the same chamber volume, which differs from that of the Mk 9, 10, 11 and 13.

 

so logically the Mk 14 probably took the same propellant charge as the 12 and 15, but navweaps has it mixed in on the wrong page lumped with the Mk 9, 10, 11 and 13 that take a bigger propellant charge due to having a larger chamber volume.

Edited by b101uk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,503
[SYN]
Members
15,331 posts
12,175 battles
28 minutes ago, b101uk said:

the Mk 12, 14 and 15 all have the same chamber volume, which differs from that of the Mk 9, 10, 11 and 13.

 

so logically the Mk 14 probably took the same propellant charge as the 12 and 15, but navweaps has it mixed in on the wrong page lumped with the Mk 9, 10, 11 and 13 that take a bigger propellant charge due to having a larger chamber volume.

yeah, it even says on navweaps

" The Mark 14 was a relined Mark 9 with a fully chrome-plated bore and a smaller chamber. The Mark 14 was used for most regunnings during World War II. "

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,080
[LEGIO]
Members
3,268 posts
6,044 battles

It is possible that all of the 8"/55 guns fired HC (or rather all 260 lb shells) at 2,800 ft/s from a new gun with the common 2700 ft/s figure actually being the average muzzle velocity with a worn barrel.

 

Consider the range tables are AFAIK the same for all variants of the 8"/55 when firing the 260 lb AP shell.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
378
[JFSOC]
[JFSOC]
Members
1,217 posts
3,888 battles

According to both navweaps.com and the USNI World Naval Weapons Systems 1991 - 1992, the Mk 14 fires HC at 2700 fps, not 2800.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For security reasons, please do not provide your personal data or the personal data of a third party here because we might be unable to protect such data in accordance with the Wargaming Privacy Policy.

Guest
You are commenting as a guest. If you have an account, please sign in.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×