Jump to content
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
renegadestatuz

Changes to Pan Asia DDs from dev blog

147 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,592
[SIM]
Members
3,021 posts
4,813 battles

Looks good to me. If we have to have radar DDs, then they should have to give up their own stealth consumable.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,367
Members
5,201 posts
9,061 battles

Good. Smoke + Radar would be too much I think.

 

Smoke + Hydro on KM DDs is already extremely potent. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
953
[WOLF1]
Members
3,800 posts
1,513 battles
5 minutes ago, SkaerKrow said:

Looks good to me. If we have to have radar DDs, then they should have to give up their own stealth consumable.

Makes sense.  They can have smoke, or radar, but not both, and since they can't have both, they made the radar a bit better.

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7,750
[NMKJT]
Beta Testers
21,983 posts
3,895 battles

Giving up Smoke won't matter.

 

PA destroyers will use their USN-like rate of fire + magically harder-hitting RU shells to gain the upper hand in the initial dogfight.

 

Other destroyer pops smoke to disengage.

 

PA destroyer pops radar, kills other destroyer.

 

PA destroyer occupies other destroyer's smoke.

Edited by AraAragami
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,275
[NDA]
Supertester
5,068 posts
14,860 battles

You know these DDs will do wonders when div'd up with another DD who packs smoke. 

I can just see the salt the Pan Asian T9 and T10 will produce when div'd up with their USN sisters lol. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
358
[NGA]
Members
1,500 posts
8,693 battles

Looks like I won't be using Radar on my Pan-A DDs. Smoke is just way to valuable to US style DDs. Unless wargaming wants to pull their heads out of their asses and do something about their shell velocity.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,345
[CUTER]
Members
3,823 posts
16,860 battles

 So this is going to be 28 seconds of radar time at T10, stealth radar time. As the bear from the red sea pointed out this will be a wombo-combo when paired with a Gearing. Kinda want.

Edited by m373x

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
794
[SF-A]
Members
2,974 posts
6,102 battles

I like it. It's not a long duration, but just enough to be worthwhile. Also like the idea of not having mini-Belfasts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,430 posts
3,718 battles
29 minutes ago, renegadestatuz said:

 

 

 

No no no and no and never.

Radar needs deleting from the game as is.

Edited by abyssofthetriffid
  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,367
Members
5,201 posts
9,061 battles
2 minutes ago, abyssofthetriffid said:

 

 

No no no and no and never.

Radar needs deleting from the game as is.

 

I suggest you find a different game then. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,345
[CUTER]
Members
3,823 posts
16,860 battles
1 minute ago, abyssofthetriffid said:

No more radar.

Remove all radar.

No and no and no.

 

 

giphy.gif

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,470
[HINON]
Supertester
7,640 posts
7,907 battles
1 minute ago, abyssofthetriffid said:

No more radar.

Remove all radar.

No and no and no.

They’ve already said it’s not going anywhere. You just need to deal with it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,430 posts
3,718 battles
Just now, renegadestatuz said:

They’ve already said it’s not going anywhere. You just need to deal with it.

What like the brit fire and invisible bbs at 5km yes ok lets just say yes please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,470
[HINON]
Supertester
7,640 posts
7,907 battles
1 minute ago, abyssofthetriffid said:

What like the brit fire and invisible bbs at 5km yes ok lets just say yes please.

Lol no BB is undetected at that range unless they’re behind an island or in smoke. Also, Brits aren’t losing their fire chance do you kind of have to deal with that as well lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,167 posts
5,386 battles

Wonder if the Gearing is going to get the same options since you know -- that is an American ship at the top of the Pan Asia line.  Going to bet no.

 

Need to understand what the point of the Gearing is going to be once this change goes through if the new line gets the same guns and harder to detect torps.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,470
[HINON]
Supertester
7,640 posts
7,907 battles
1 minute ago, Psicopro said:

Wonder if the Gearing is going to get the same options since you know -- that is an American ship at the top of the Pan Asia line.  Going to bet no.

 

Need to understand what the point of the Gearing is going to be once this change goes through if the new line gets the same guns and harder to detect torps.

Gearing has more health, is more maneuverable and also has torps that can hit other DDs.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,430 posts
3,718 battles

Delete the pan tree now and the new british bb line delete them also.

Line of sight is broken.

Lag is real.

Radar in tier 5 is a joke.

Remove radar and balance.

I actually was brawling at under a km last night and launched my torps proper devastation to the enemy ship but voila no launch i died.

 

This game is so broken like a 7 year old relationship.

utterly broken.

Edited by abyssofthetriffid

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,470
[HINON]
Supertester
7,640 posts
7,907 battles
1 minute ago, abyssofthetriffid said:

Delete the pan tree now and the new british bb line delete them also.

Line of sight is broken.

Lag is real.

Radar in tier 5 is a joke.

Remove radar and balance.

I actually was brawling at under a km last night and launched my torps proper devastation to the enemy ship but voila no launch i died.

 

This game is so broken like a 7 year old relationship.

utterly broken.

Lol they’re not gonna delete the trees, so asking for that to happen is pointless.

 

Also, if you feel the game is that broken, then why deal with it and and why not just go play another game?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,167 posts
5,386 battles
Just now, renegadestatuz said:

Gearing has more health, is more maneuverable and also has torps that can hit other DDs.

The first two won't matter if caught in Radar in a cap.  The third is more luck than a practical ability.

 

Too bad, I like contesting caps.  Guess that got harder again.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,438
[CRMSN]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
5,753 posts
3,923 battles
5 minutes ago, renegadestatuz said:

Gearing has more health, is more maneuverable and also has torps that can hit other DDs.

Gearing has 900 more health. 

In exchange for being 

Slower
Less Maneuverable (640 vs 620)
Less Rudder Shift (3.3 vs 3.1) 
Much less concealment (.6 km difference) 

Outside of the Torpedoes not hitting other DD's. The Hsiang Yang is much better then the Gearing. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×