Simple Solution to the CV-Clan Wars Issue

[NotSynpax]

Let the battles be for tier X ships, but only allow Tier 8 CVs. 

[_Zeka]

You wanna be the scrub who brings a Lexington or Shokaku vs  tier X AA?

[cometguy]

8 minutes ago, FireAndHEspam said:

You wanna be the scrub who brings a Lexington or Shokaku vs  tier X AA?

With the way MM works, pretty much every time you take out a t8 CV you're bottom tier anyway.

[_Zeka]

6 minutes ago, cometguy said:

With the way MM works, pretty much every time you take out a t8 CV you're bottom tier anyway.

The difference here is that this is actually a competitive environment and by bringing a tier VIII CV against tier X AA you're basically needlessly handicapping your team

[khorender_1]

That idea is as bad as "renting" t10 ships to people who have t7's or less in their ports ...

[cometguy]

19 minutes ago, FireAndHEspam said:

The difference here is that this is actually a competitive environment and by bringing a tier VIII CV against tier X AA you're basically needlessly handicapping your team

T9 then. If t10 is too OP, and t8 is too UP.

[Warlord78]

What kind of a suggestion is this?

[FirstOfOne]

Or make CW 12v12 and allow 1 CV.

 

Thats pretty simple too.(and better)

[Spartias]

T10 CVs are balanced against t10 AA. You're used to seeing T10 CVs striking against teams with mostly t8 AA, or against non AA builds.

 

Putting t8 CVs in is a great suggestion if you've never actually played a t10 CV I guess.

 

But if you have... then you wouldn't make such a suggestion.

[Crucis]

2 hours ago, FirstOfOne said:

Or make CW 12v12 and allow 1 CV.

 

Thats pretty simple too.(and better)

Ah, but clan BATTLES isn't clan WARS!!!  Or at least it doesn't sound like it.  It sounds more like WoT's Stronghold Battles.

 

[Bronco]

7 minutes ago, Crucis said:

Ah, but clan BATTLES isn't clan WARS!!!  Or at least it doesn't sound like it.  It sounds more like WoT's Stronghold Battles.

 

And yet there is no class restriction in WoT's Stronghold Battles?!

[Crucis]

1 minute ago, Bronco said:

And yet there is no class restriction in WoT's Stronghold Battles?!

I didn't make the SH battles comment in relation to CV's.

[Rilak]

The reason no CV is 7 groups of planes can recon the entire map. All the time. Thus making play poor.

   No sneaking about no using stealth builds etc..

 

[Bronco]

59 minutes ago, Crucis said:

I didn't make the SH battles comment in relation to CV's.

You're right. I misread your comment given the intent of this thread. You were comparing battles vs wars and nothing more. My bad, sorry for that mate.

[Crucis]

1 minute ago, Bronco said:

You're right. I misread your comment given the intent of this thread. You were comparing battles vs wars and nothing more. My bad, sorry for that mate.

no prob.

WG may not be ready for full-on clan wars in WoWS.  After all, this isn't like Tanks where you're fighting over actual real estate.  No body really cares about the middle of the ocean, unless perhaps there's some island in it. This is why I think that they may have gone for a stronghold battles-like clan battles before going to Clan Wars.  CW's are probably a lot more challenging to come up with a viable working premise.  CB's probably buys WG time to work on WoWS CWs while throwing clannies a bone.

[brym7]

Well, it's an idea, but the 12v12 and allow 1 CV idea that was pitched seems better, also I'll add saying perhaps up the Battleships to 2 in that situation.

[Crucis]

Just now, brym7 said:

Well, it's an idea, but the 12v12 and allow 1 CV idea that was pitched seems better, also I'll add saying perhaps up the Battleships to 2 in that situation.

I think that they may have wanted to keep CB's smaller, in part so that smaller clans are more able to form full CB teams.

[Bronco]

1 minute ago, brym7 said:

Well, it's an idea, but the 12v12 and allow 1 CV idea that was pitched seems better, also I'll add saying perhaps up the Battleships to 2 in that situation.

12v12, 1CV max but perhaps a 3 BB max. With 9v9 in supremacy, you're allowed 3 BBs so why not with 12v12.

[brym7]

Just now, Crucis said:

I think that they may have wanted to keep CB's smaller, in part so that smaller clans are more able to form full CB teams.

Which does make sense as well following the smaller clan sizes, but it's just an idea pitch to make CVs in their current state more to WG's liking. 

[brym7]

2 minutes ago, Bronco said:

12v12, 1CV max but perhaps a 3 BB max. With 9v9 in supremacy, you're allowed 3 BBs so why not with 12v12.

3 works too