Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
SteelClaw

Clan wars will be a joke.

26 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,102
Members
1,264 posts

Without CV and only one BB and no restrictions on CA or DD one of two things will happen. You will have teams made up of all radar ca or teams made up of all Shima/gearing DD. I have the feeling it will be the DD set-up. With that amount of stealthy ships and no cv to find them the torp spam will be insane and even the best CA will go down to torps. 7 DD spamming torps and none to spot them... good luck unless the other team has the same. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
725
[NEUTR]
Members
2,207 posts
11,692 battles

Clan war's always joke. Since, in WoT, when WG changed clan wars to favor clans with huge numbers instead of elite smaller clans.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,678
Banned
2,229 posts
11,923 battles

I feel like that just added an oil economy (and a couple clan buffs to spend it on) to team battles and called it a day.  One of the most lazy demonstrations of added content from a game developer I've ever seen.  But we'll see.  Time will tell.

 

We need a strongholds mode with rewards like the oil economy or preferably something more complex / intuitive.  We'll never sustain reasonable queue times otherwise.

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,102
Members
1,264 posts
2 hours ago, VGLance said:

I feel like that just added an oil economy (and a couple clan buffs to spend it on) to team battles and called it a day.  One of the most lazy demonstrations of added content from a game developer I've ever seen.  But we'll see.  Time will tell.

 

We need a strongholds mode with rewards like the oil economy or preferably something more complex / intuitive.  We'll never sustain reasonable queue times otherwise.

In total agreement. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
398
[SIMP]
Members
1,518 posts
12,922 battles
3 hours ago, NeutralState said:

Clan war's always joke. Since, in WoT, when WG changed clan wars to favor clans with huge numbers instead of elite smaller clans.

That is a complete falsehood.

WoT clan size was always 100 members.

100 members could easily take 5+ territories @ 15 chips per territory. If they were good that is.

 

Edited by _cthulhu_
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43
[MPIRE]
Alpha Tester
186 posts
9,948 battles

No CVs, one BB, and rental tier 10s???  Anyone who's played CV to tier 10... WG just called you worthless.  Whoever decided on this structure for clan wars should not be involved in Clan Wars ever again.  Welcome to World of Khabs.

Edited by Ihitu

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,799
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
30,523 posts
6,337 battles
3 hours ago, VGLance said:

I feel like that just added an oil economy (and a couple clan buffs to spend it on) to team battles and called it a day.  One of the most lazy demonstrations of added content from a game developer I've ever seen.  But we'll see.  Time will tell.

 

We need a strongholds mode with rewards like the oil economy or preferably something more complex / intuitive.  We'll never sustain reasonable queue times otherwise.

Not even team battles. It's a crappy adaptation of Ranked.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
225 posts
1,854 battles

Lets look at CW at the perspective of every type of player...
CVs: Can't use my own ship...
BBs: IM ON FIRE AGAIN!
CA/CLs: HE/radar/hydro spam...
DDs: Yeah... take out CVs... I'm still spotted by other things...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
173
[SHLMO]
Members
298 posts
896 battles
3 hours ago, NeutralState said:

Clan war's always joke. Since, in WoT, when WG changed clan wars to favor clans with huge numbers instead of elite smaller clans.

didn't the whole company already a joke?
:cap_cool:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
7,122 posts
27,350 battles
58 minutes ago, Ihitu said:

No CVs, one BB, and rental tier 10s???  Anyone who's played CV to tier 10... WG just called you worthless.  Whoever decided on this structure for clan wars should not be involved in Clan Wars ever again.  Welcome to World of Khabs.

Probably a fantastic idea. One team cannot have more than one of each ship. I don't anticipate playing clan wars but don't want to see the overall game diminished by this either.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
725
[NEUTR]
Members
2,207 posts
11,692 battles
9 hours ago, _cthulhu_ said:

That is a complete falsehood.

WoT clan size was always 100 members.

100 members could easily take 5+ territories @ 15 chips per territory. If they were good that is.

 

Vehicles used in clan wars did not get "locked" after battle till a major patch. Smaller clans ceased to exist after that patch because no matter how good they are, they just lose due to numbers. Reddit clans (narwhal, Rddt #s) are notorious for doing this. They send in the low tier sub clans to grind down the defender then let narwhal takes over the province. They were doing it for the sake of doing it. Some sub clans just suicide into defenders taking out as many tanks as they can, rinse and repeat. inbeforeinrealwarsattritionmatters.

Edited by NeutralState

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
398
[SIMP]
Members
1,518 posts
12,922 battles
4 hours ago, NeutralState said:

Vehicles used in clan wars did not get "locked" after battle till a major patch. Smaller clans ceased to exist after that patch because no matter how good they are, they just lose due to numbers. Reddit clans (narwhal, Rddt #s) are notorious for doing this. They send in the low tier sub clans to grind down the defender then let narwhal takes over the province. They were doing it for the sake of doing it. Some sub clans just suicide into defenders taking out as many tanks as they can, rinse and repeat. inbeforeinrealwarsattritionmatters.

You need to have more than 1 T10 to compete at an elite level, I personally have 26, SIMP has no sub clans and did fine. Any clan can get chip spammed.

Narwhal and Rddt clans arent considered elite by any means.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
522 posts
15,994 battles

I'm happy to give it a go. This is their first go at Clan wars, so there will no doubt be adjustments down the road. My hope is that they open it up to tier 8 and allow more than 1 BB. As for the CVs, I think this is an implicit admission on WG's part that CVs are problematic and require a long overdue overhaul.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5,644
[O7]
Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester
12,147 posts
9,111 battles
13 hours ago, IronWolfV said:

Not even team battles. It's a crappy adaptation of Ranked.

If there is a reward at the end that is anywhere as valuable for the amount of time people have to put in it will be a massive improvement just simply because I can play with people I like to play with instead of idiots trying to prove the 2 20 rule. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6,799
Alpha Tester, Beta Testers
30,523 posts
6,337 battles
Just now, 1nv4d3rZ1m said:

If there is a reward at the end that is anywhere as valuable for the amount of time people have to put in it will be a massive improvement just simply because I can play with people I like to play with instead of idiots trying to prove the 2 20 rule. 

Mostly I see them trying to prove rule 34.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10,399
[B2P]
Members
13,459 posts
44,054 battles

We skirmish with other clans in T10s all the time. Good matches.

The key point is going to be 7 people who know and trust one another, working together to win. That will be a totally novel experience. No TKing. Nobody driving off into the distance like in Ranked, forcing others to carry. No DD going B when everyone says A. Nobody fulfilling a mission instead of playing to win. 

 

Gonna be fun no matter what. And best of all -- no CVs. So winning isn't going to depend on the captain of the off-map guided missile cruiser.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,728
[ABDA]
Beta Testers
17,538 posts
12,810 battles
17 hours ago, VGLance said:

I feel like that just added an oil economy (and a couple clan buffs to spend it on) to team battles and called it a day.  One of the most lazy demonstrations of added content from a game developer I've ever seen.  But we'll see.  Time will tell.

 

We need a strongholds mode with rewards like the oil economy or preferably something more complex / intuitive.  We'll never sustain reasonable queue times otherwise.

I have to believe that queue times are what's driving the head scratching decisions they are making.  Banning CVs increases the chance CV haters will play, limiting BBs makes cruiser players more interested, and DD's have less to fear because only a few cruisers have the tools to hunt them.  Rental ships allows non-T10 owners access.

From where I sit, they are either incompetent, or desperate.  When you factor in some of the other evidence, I think desperation is the answer.  They are cash grabbing with every premium they release.  The much hated Belfast available for doubloons, overpowered Kaga now available for doubloons.  Huang He as a T6, with her t4 firepower.  The Graf Zeppelin debacle.  Cash driven clan expanding.  many of these are enormously unpopular choices.  They have to KNOW they are going to be unpopular, yet they are doing them anyways.

Need must drive them.  I think they are strapped for cash and are milking this cow for every cent they can get.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12,715
[PSP]
[PSP]
Members
19,325 posts

In an RTS game I used to play the multiplayer section had game rooms where people could chose the team they were going to be on and the game host could invite or dismiss players. Furthermore, the game had ranks that showed while one was in the game room and an option to disallow people from joining if they were ranked too low or too high. As with any system, there was some abuse but in general it worked well and still does -- the game has been active for ten years.

 

I think something like this would be a benefit to WOWS gameplay. Players usually can put together a balanced game better than a random search algorithm can. Also, the pre-game chat in the game rooms generally enhances the sense of community among players. An option for post-game chat would greatly enhance gameplay too, even if WG just allowed a minute for everyone to say "GG."

Edited by Snargfargle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
269
Members
832 posts
5,277 battles

I just want to see 7 Shimas unleash a 105 torp wall. Don't care how good you are at dodging. Good luck. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,153
[ARGSY]
Members
10,326 posts
16,228 battles
15 hours ago, Ihitu said:

No CVs, one BB, and rental tier 10s???  Anyone who's played CV to tier 10... WG just called you worthless.  Whoever decided on this structure for clan wars should not be involved in Clan Wars ever again.  Welcome to World of Khabs.

meh,   moskva and hindy can wreck khabs.      meh.       and CVs will be back  when they are balanced.  :D  (which may be  a long while )  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
554
[ONE38]
Members
3,782 posts
14,818 battles
16 hours ago, IronWolfV said:

Not even team battles. It's a crappy adaptation of Ranked.

 

With two cups of public test server, AKA, RentaTen ™.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,716 posts
8,224 battles
50 minutes ago, Merlox said:

I just want to see 7 Shimas unleash a 105 torp wall. Don't care how good you are at dodging. Good luck. lol

lol IKR, that's what I am waiting to see....even if they alternate firing off their torps, its going to be a mess.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×