Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
Happy668

Best T10 BB?

83 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

311
[WOLF1]
Members
2,197 posts

looks like the conqueror? at least on paper?

pretty good guns (only second to yamato, which 72s turn just too slow)

best concealment

best maneuverability

size seems pretty small (just eyeball, no data)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
311
[WOLF1]
Members
2,197 posts
2 minutes ago, IronMike11B4O said:

Conq if you like driving a large cruiser. Yami if you like laughing at people who think angling will somehow save them.

I agree yamato got the best guns, but 72s turn is almost twice as slow as others, which means lots of missed opportunities

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23,543
[HINON]
Supertester
19,566 posts
13,172 battles

Conq if you like farming meaningless damage. Yam if you like winning matches. Kurfuerst if you like driving around an angry glacier with pissed off CLs strapped to your sides.

  • Cool 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
311
[WOLF1]
Members
2,197 posts
2 minutes ago, Lert said:

Conq if you like farming meaningless damage. Yam if you like winning matches. Kurfuerst if you like driving around an angry glacier with pissed off CLs strapped to your sides.

lol

but damage sink ships...

Edited by Happy668

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23,543
[HINON]
Supertester
19,566 posts
13,172 battles
22 minutes ago, Happy668 said:

but damage sink ships...

30k damage to a battleship's citadel is more valuable than 60k fire damage. Fire damage can be healed back.

People stare themselves blind on the damage Conqueror is doing, forgetting to look at its winrate. Yes, the Conq does a lot of damage, but it's not translating into wins, compared to, say, Yamato. That's because the damage Conqueror does is mostly fire damage to battleships, something a battleship is well suited to tank a lot of and survive.

Compare that to a Yamato, who mostly does AP pen damage, which is damage that sticks.

That's why Yamato carries and Conqueror less so.

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
311
[WOLF1]
Members
2,197 posts
4 minutes ago, Lert said:

30k damage to a battleship's citadel is more valuable than 60k fire damage. Fire damage can be healed back.

People stare themselves blind on the damage Conqueror is doing, forgetting to look at its winrate. Yes, the Conq does a lot of damage, but it's not translating into wins, compared to, say, Yamato. That's because the damage Conqueror does is mostly fire damage to battleships, something a battleship is well suited to tank a lot of and survive.

yamato seems way too slow, I tried british to orion, it's painful to aim/turn

btw warships.today stops working? where can I see win statistics

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,605
[WOLF2]
Beta Testers
3,925 posts
5,386 battles

I don't own a Conqueror, but honestly I haven't been that impressed by them when I've seen them in matches.  Of course, I pretty much only play cruisers at Tiers 9 and 10, so maybe I'd feel differently in a battleship.

 

. . . but while I love battleships at Tiers 8 and below.  At tiers 9 and 10 its dull.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,057 posts
8,586 battles
4 minutes ago, issm said:

 

Yamato is the squishiest BB at T10

 

The guns aren't good enough to compensate.

You’re doing something wrong the

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
311
[WOLF1]
Members
2,197 posts
10 minutes ago, issm said:

 

Yamato is the squishiest BB at T10

 

The guns aren't good enough to compensate.

really? i would think conqueror is the squishiest

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
124
[DARTH]
Members
538 posts
11,834 battles
1 hour ago, Happy668 said:

looks like the conqueror? at least on paper?

pretty good guns (only second to yamato, which 72s turn just too slow)

best concealment

best maneuverability

size seems pretty small (just eyeball, no data)

Do you just want to watch the world burn? => Conqueror

Do you love the lolpen? => Yamato

Do you like to brawl and watch your secondaries light up in a fiery display? => Grosser Kurfurst

Do you want hard hitting AP and good AA in a 'balanced' package? => Montana

Fads aside, the 'best' for you is the one that makes you happiest.  If you love Bismarck, you'll love GK.  If you love fire breathing cruisers, you'll love Conqueror.  If you love your North Carolina, then Montana is for you.  And of course, Yamato is a thing with no ready counterpart, so there is that too.

They all have something going for them.  It's just a question of whether that something aligns with your playstyle.

:cap_cool:

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
397 posts
6,112 battles
42 minutes ago, Lert said:

30k damage to a battleship's citadel is more valuable than 60k fire damage. Fire damage can be healed back.

People stare themselves blind on the damage Conqueror is doing, forgetting to look at its winrate. Yes, the Conq does a lot of damage, but it's not translating into wins, compared to, say, Yamato. That's because the damage Conqueror does is mostly fire damage to battleships, something a battleship is well suited to tank a lot of and survive.

Compare that to a Yamato, who mostly does AP pen damage, which is damage that sticks.

That's why Yamato carries and Conqueror less so.

But the AP is not bad, so that is on the people that play them. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,184
[NOVA]
Members
11,026 posts
7 minutes ago, Citrusss said:

You’re doing something wrong the

 

Let me rephrase that. The lolpen does not compensate enough for the squishiness for Yamato to be the best T10BB.

 

Just now, Happy668 said:

really? i would think conqueror is the squishiest

 

Conqueror has the insane heal to compensate.

 

Conq also has an underwater citadel, and insane concealment.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
397 posts
6,112 battles
1 minute ago, Korval_BB55 said:

Do you just want to watch the world burn? => Conqueror

Do you love the lolpen? => Yamato

Do you like to brawl and watch your secondaries light up in a fiery display? => Grosser Kurfurst

Do you want hard hitting AP and good AA in a 'balanced' package? => Montana

Fads aside, the 'best' for you is the one that makes you happiest.  If you love Bismarck, you'll love GK.  If you love fire breathing cruisers, you'll love Conqueror.  If you love your North Carolina, then Montana is for you.  And of course, Yamato is a thing with no ready counterpart, so there is that too.

They all have something going for them.  It's just a question of whether that something aligns with your playstyle.

:cap_cool:

Montana AA is over rated, I get as many plane kills with GK as Montana does in most games. 

 

AA is also not something a ship should be balanced on, it is too situational. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,313
[CAFE]
Beta Testers
4,377 posts
8,747 battles

Honestly all the T10 battleships are in a good place.. and you cant go wrong with any of the choices.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
513 posts
1,333 battles
7 minutes ago, SmokinCAT said:

But the AP is not bad, so that is on the people that play them. 

You can't citadel BBs in it... Like literally no possible because of the short fuse. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
513 posts
1,333 battles
9 minutes ago, issm said:

 

Let me rephrase that. The lolpen does not compensate enough for the squishiness for Yamato to be the best T10BB.

 

 

Conqueror has the insane heal to compensate.

 

Conq also has an underwater citadel, and insane concealment.

 

So you are saying you would give up the lolpen to buff other aspects of the ship?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×