Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
SmokinCAT

How long?

9 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

3,605
[INTEL]
Members
8,405 posts
25,221 battles

They are not broken, if anything they are underpowered. In fact they are well balanced. If doubt, check out their solo win rates.... They put up gaudy damage numbers but cant carry, and dont win.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
373 posts
5,700 battles
26 minutes ago, Taichunger said:

They are not broken, if anything they are underpowered. In fact they are well balanced. If doubt, check out their solo win rates.... They put up gaudy damage numbers but cant carry, and dont win.

By that notion my Großer Kurfurst is under powered...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
373 posts
5,700 battles
29 minutes ago, Taichunger said:

They are not broken, if anything they are underpowered. In fact they are well balanced. If doubt, check out their solo win rates.... They put up gaudy damage numbers but cant carry, and dont win.

 

Looking at your T9s, the Lion has the highest win rate, and you average 13K more damage than your next highest damage T9.

 

I am sure with those kind of numbers you wouldn't want them nerfed.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
100
[NGUNS]
Beta Testers
513 posts
2,984 battles
8 minutes ago, SmokinCAT said:

By that notion my Großer Kurfurst is under powered...

Only yours, eh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,605
[INTEL]
Members
8,405 posts
25,221 battles
5 hours ago, SmokinCAT said:

 

Looking at your T9s, the Lion has the highest win rate, and you average 13K more damage than your next highest damage T9.

 

I am sure with those kind of numbers you wouldn't want them nerfed.

 

Because i div Lion because it cant carry. Iowa i solo because it can carry...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×