1,477 [HINON] renegadestatuz Members 7,656 posts 8,214 battles Report post #1 Posted September 20, 2017 Teased on the WoWs Asia FB pages esrlier. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,550 [SYN] Kapitan_Wuff Members 8,256 posts 14,111 battles Report post #2 Posted September 20, 2017 (edited) Yay, Thats a commonwealth ship I am actually excited about. Kinda surprised the second commonwealth ship is another Australian one though, I was expecting Canadian next. Edit: Just noticed it's t3, seems low to me. That surprise anyone else? Edited September 20, 2017 by Kapitan_Wuff Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
7,503 [GGWP] DuckyShot Members 7,086 posts 16,368 battles Report post #3 Posted September 20, 2017 Nice, but Haida would be nicer... I mean, if they want to release a premium CW destroyer... 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,345 Chaos_EN2 ∞ Members 4,203 posts 8,877 battles Report post #4 Posted September 20, 2017 4 minutes ago, renegadestatuz said: Teased on the WoWs Asia FB pages esrlier. Wow thank you @renegadestatuz you must surf the web all the time for this stuff Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,299 [SPTR] Rolkatsuki Members 27,185 posts 16,907 battles Report post #5 Posted September 20, 2017 Its a Yay was expecting it to be a tier 4 DD but its another Australian ship so thank you WG, go please the Canadians now /;^_\\ Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,477 [HINON] renegadestatuz Members 7,656 posts 8,214 battles Report post #6 Posted September 20, 2017 7 minutes ago, Chaos_EN2 said: Wow thank you @renegadestatuz you must surf the web all the time for this stuff Always keeping my eye out Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,345 Chaos_EN2 ∞ Members 4,203 posts 8,877 battles Report post #7 Posted September 20, 2017 1 minute ago, renegadestatuz said: Always keeping my eye out Well I do not know what you do in r/l, but you would make a great reporter Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,279 [ARP] The_first_harbinger Members 3,679 posts 8,111 battles Report post #8 Posted September 20, 2017 More Commonwealth botes! Hooray! How about give her the gimmick of healing back 20% of damage she dealt with torpedoes for the shiz and giggles... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,588 [CRMSN] Cobraclutch Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters 6,009 posts 4,623 battles Report post #9 Posted September 20, 2017 This is not the vampire you are looking for. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
640 [LLMF] StoptheViolins Alpha Tester 2,438 posts Report post #10 Posted September 20, 2017 Quote ST, Australian destroyer Vampire, tier III. Hit points - 9 500, plating - 3-10 mm. Main battery - 4х1 102 mm. Firing range - 10.1 km. HE damage - 1500, AP damage - 1700. Reload time 5 s., 180 degree turn time - 18 s., maximum dispersion - 91 m. HE and AP initial velocity - 805 m/s. Torpedo tubes - 1х3 533 mm, torpedo range - 6 km, torpedo speed - 53 kt, reload time 62 s., maximum damage - 10 000. Maximum speed - 34 kt. Turning circle radius - 520 m., rudder shift time - 2.5 s. Surface detectability - 6.3 km, air detectability - 3 km. All stats are listed without crew and upgrade modifiers. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,044 [NDA] Aivris Supertester, Alpha Tester, Beta Testers 5,662 posts 4,470 battles Report post #11 Posted September 20, 2017 Always keen for more Aussie ships. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
5,112 [SIM] SkaerKrow Members 5,365 posts 8,845 battles Report post #12 Posted September 20, 2017 Hell yeah. Now I just need someone to make a Hot Topic skin for it, and a custom Lestat captain portrait. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
6,795 [SYN] IronWolfV [SYN] Alpha Tester, Beta Testers 30,523 posts 5,697 battles Report post #13 Posted September 20, 2017 Vampire?! KILL IT! KILL IT WITH FIRE!! Oh...wait wrong Vampire. Looks cool. GAME ON! 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,588 [CRMSN] Cobraclutch Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters 6,009 posts 4,623 battles Report post #14 Posted September 20, 2017 Just now, IronWolfV said: Vampire?! KILL IT! KILL IT WITH FIRE!! Oh...wait wrong Vampire. Looks cool. GAME ON! Not surprising.. I would expect Daring class DD's to come with RN DD line. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,519 [POP] tm63au Members 2,921 posts 23,636 battles Report post #15 Posted September 20, 2017 (edited) 38 minutes ago, renegadestatuz said: Teased on the WoWs Asia FB pages esrlier. Is this another WG joke just went to WOWS Asia face book page to check the stats for the ship 1 x 3 torpedo tubes then went to Wikipedia the ship was armed with 6 x 21 ( 2x 3 mounts ) inch torpedo tubes later upgraded to quad mounted tubes, WG devs need to get off the vodka and the beluga and do some proper research Edited September 20, 2017 by tm63au 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,588 [CRMSN] Cobraclutch Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters 6,009 posts 4,623 battles Report post #16 Posted September 20, 2017 Too bad we don't get HMCS Vancouver (another V class) , which was a ship that was part of the dunkirk evacuation. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,519 [POP] tm63au Members 2,921 posts 23,636 battles Report post #17 Posted September 20, 2017 (edited) 8 minutes ago, tm63au said: double post Edited September 20, 2017 by tm63au Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
254 [AARG] Adm_Nate_Ellis937 Beta Testers 1,200 posts Report post #18 Posted September 20, 2017 Would rather have Haida. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,477 [HINON] renegadestatuz Members 7,656 posts 8,214 battles Report post #19 Posted September 20, 2017 4 minutes ago, Adm_Nate_Ellis937 said: Would rather have Haida. She will come eventually. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
254 [AARG] Adm_Nate_Ellis937 Beta Testers 1,200 posts Report post #20 Posted September 20, 2017 Just now, renegadestatuz said: She will come eventually. They shot her Naval Legends months ago.....we don't need another Aussie ship. You guys have the Perth. Plus, Haida has a far more enriched history. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
4,247 [RLGN] Estimated_Prophet Members 14,855 posts 26,383 battles Report post #21 Posted September 20, 2017 (edited) Someone say Vampire? Will admit that tier seems a bit low; but then what do I know... Spoiler I would imagine the Vampire currently in Sydney would have a slightly higher tier... Edited September 20, 2017 by Estimated_Prophet Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,477 [HINON] renegadestatuz Members 7,656 posts 8,214 battles Report post #22 Posted September 20, 2017 7 minutes ago, Adm_Nate_Ellis937 said: They shot her Naval Legends months ago.....we don't need another Aussie ship. You guys have the Perth. Plus, Haida has a far more enriched history. "You guys"? I'm not Australian. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,115 Wolcott Alpha Tester 2,552 posts Report post #23 Posted September 20, 2017 25 minutes ago, tm63au said: Is this another WG joke just went to WOWS Asia face book page to check the stats for the ship 1 x 3 torpedo tubes then went to Wikipedia the ship was armed with 6 x 21 ( 2x 3 mounts ) inch torpedo tubes later upgraded to quad mounted tubes, WG devs need to get off the vodka and the beluga and do some proper research Wikipedia isn't always accurate either. "INDIAN OCEAN. 1942-03-04. STARBOARD QUARTER VIEW OF THE DESTROYER HMAS VAMPIRE (I) (I68) WHILE ESCORTING TROOP CONVOY SU1 (NOT IN SIGHT) WITH AUSTRALIAN SERVICEMEN BOUND FROM THE MIDDLE EAST TO AUSTRALIA. SHE WEARS A CAMOUFLAGE PATTERN OF THREE SHADES OF GREY. HER SEARCHLIGHT PLATFORM HAS BEEN MOVED TO A POSITION BETWEEN THE FUNNELS. IT HAS BEEN REPLACED IN ITS FORMER POSITION, AND THAT OF THE AFTER TORPEDO TUBES, BY A PLATFORM FOR TWO SINGLE 2 POUNDER AA GUNS. (NAVAL HISTORICAL COLLECTION)" https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/C45921 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
59 [POI--] WeissRaben_2 Members 190 posts 2,108 battles Report post #24 Posted September 20, 2017 25 minutes ago, tm63au said: Is this another WG joke just went to WOWS Asia face book page to check the stats for the ship 1 x 3 torpedo tubes then went to Wikipedia the ship was armed with 6 x 21 ( 2x 3 mounts ) inch torpedo tubes later upgraded to quad mounted tubes, WG devs need to get off the vodka and the beluga and do some proper research Nope. By the time she sunk, the Vampire only mounted one single triple tube. Quote At 2:37 am the dim shape of what Commander Moran took to be a destroyer appeared on Vampire's starboard bow. Seeking the transports he continued in towards Endau and soon sighted a second 'destroyer' 'right ahead and close.' Vampire swung to port and fired two torpedoes without result. This ship, which was in fact a minesweeper patrolling outside the anchorage, sighted Vampire and gave the alarm. The two British destroyers continued their course towards Endau until shortly after 3:00 am and when not sighting the expected concentration they turned south east by east and increased to best speed. At 3:18 am their luck ran out. A destroyer appeared on Vampire's port bow and she fired her remaining torpedo. Again she missed while Thanet altering course to starboard fired all her torpedoes but they too sped harmlessly past the target. The Japanese destroyer opened fire and the cruiser Sendai joined in the confused melee that followed. Hopelessly outnumbered Vampire and Thanet retired south east by east at top speed, returning the Japanese fire in the unequal engagement. Quote is taken from the Vampire page on the Australian Navy website. http://www.navy.gov.au/hmas-vampire-i 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,519 [POP] tm63au Members 2,921 posts 23,636 battles Report post #25 Posted September 20, 2017 4 minutes ago, WeissRaben_2 said: Nope. By the time she sunk, the Vampire only mounted one single triple tube. Quote is taken from the Vampire page on the Australian Navy website. http://www.navy.gov.au/hmas-vampire-i Ok looking at that page now it may say that but the stats on the page still say 2 x 3 mounts, you think it would say that they were removed with a date attached. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
