Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
skull_122_steel

SMS Kaiser Barbarossa

15 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

173
[COB45]
Members
1,011 posts
3,482 battles

so can we get the SMS Kaiser Barbarossa and a tier II reward for a month long misson like they did with the Mikasa 

 

if you are wondering "what the hell is the SMS Kaiser Barbarossa" then here is a link to the Wiki page on it

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS_Kaiser_Barbarossa

 

and here are some stats that are worth noting.

-it had above water non-fixed mounts of 450mm torpedoes three on each side

-has a 2X2 load out of 240mm guns

-has an 18X1 load out of 150mm guns

-and has 12 88mm guns

-has a 300mm belt

 

I think this would be a great addition to the game and need to happen

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12,675
[SALVO]
Members
28,247 posts
43,821 battles

It might be a great addition to the game, but why does it "need" to happen exactly?  You've made no case for this assertion.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
173
[COB45]
Members
1,011 posts
3,482 battles
2 minutes ago, Crucis said:

It might be a great addition to the game, but why does it "need" to happen exactly?  You've made no case for this assertion.

ehh my grammer is bad and it is my opinion that all notions should have a tier II pre-dreadnought.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
4,335 posts
10,763 battles
1 hour ago, skull_122_steel said:

ehh my grammer is bad and it is my opinion that all notions should have a tier II pre-dreadnought.

Agreed. +1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,695
[FOXEH]
Alpha Tester
6,887 posts
22,764 battles
1 hour ago, skull_122_steel said:

ehh my grammer is bad and it is my opinion that all notions should have a tier II pre-dreadnought.

we asked for this in Alpha/Beta Wg never delivered. Personally I find it silly that we don't have tier 2 BBs:cap_old:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
173
[COB45]
Members
1,011 posts
3,482 battles
45 minutes ago, BladedPheonix said:

I'd rather have the Schleswig-Holstein

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SMS_Schleswig-Holstein

 

its a more modern design of the 1 OP suggested :fish_book: and it has a bit more historical value.

but this one has torpedos the move and are above water but that one would work to

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12,675
[SALVO]
Members
28,247 posts
43,821 battles
3 hours ago, skull_122_steel said:

ehh my grammer is bad and it is my opinion that all notions should have a tier II pre-dreadnought.

I have no problem with the idea that all nations should have a tier 2 pre-dreadnought.  None whatsoever.  Sounds like a logical argument for a "need" to me.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
34
[M-B]
[M-B]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
212 posts
11,821 battles

MOARRRRRGGHH Pre-Dreadnoughts! AYE CAP'N! Pre-pare for board'n!:Smile_izmena:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,791
[HINON]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
8,856 posts
3,680 battles

30 secondary mounts!! :cap_fainting:

 

Jeez Germany, take a chill pill on the secondaries.... 

 

I wouldn't mind another pre-dred in the game... but if its gonna be a German pred-dred it should really be Schleswig Holstein.

 

If it must be a Kaiser Friederich III class, it should be Kaiser Friederich III herself (or even Kaiser Wilhelm der Grosse) with a large modernized bridge.

 

SMS_Kaiser_Friedrich_III_um_1900.jpg

 

Image result for kaiser friedrich III class battleships

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
642 posts
782 battles

The basic idea to have pre-dreadnaughts in WOWS is certainly appealing and desirable. However, as a (former) game designer I have thought about this from a player and playability POV. The ships of that era were slow. The guns were dominated by a weighted RNG most players would find frustrating beyond tolerance. Range finding was totally erratic and variable, communication slow and highly dependent on flag hoists and night signal lights. Turret rotation and ROF are glacial. My point is that WG would certainly have to upgrade the ships performance in almost every area to fit a battle of 15 or 20 minutes. If the battles are not fun or inconclusive except for some points system then the absolute requirement for players to have 'fun' playing the ships would doom the game tier.

No one would be much happier than me to see such wonderful warships on the screen and in my port. But the game design required to make these ships playable and fun would be a formidable task for game designers. I may be retired but would jump at the chance to work on such designs but since there is no chance of that then I would like to think that WG has some basic interest in the ships for a future release.

BTW - Hey dcee, how are you doing? Congrats for those beautiful pictures of those classic ships. You done good my friend. Close action brawling is the heart and soul of the pre-dreadnaught.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,039 posts
14,276 battles

Let's do a really interesting and new pre dreadnought.  

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_battleships_of_Austria-Hungary#/media/File%3AHabsburg_class_battleship.jpg

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habsburg-class_battleship

Speed: 19 knots(35 km/h; 22 mph)
Complement: 638
Armament:

 

Armor:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×