Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Ju87s

Simple fix to the UK BB line

20 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

444
[MPIRE]
Banned
1,662 posts
28,362 battles

Just give them the same citadel as the Nelson.  The Nelson is a powerful ship, but with that easy to hit citadel, it can easily be deleted if it miscalculates and gives its broadside.  I'm hearing a lot of complaints about the UKBBs, especially the Conqueror with its HE and insane heals.  So just give it that ugly citadel and it will be a lot more balanced.  Maybe nerf its concealment as well.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,815
[-KIA-]
Members
5,245 posts
16,911 battles

Well, unless you want to give all of them super-heals...

 

To be honest, I like that idea, farming dreadnoughts.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,860
[NMKJT]
Beta Testers
24,800 posts
3,956 battles
14 minutes ago, awildpervert said:

most likely they will lower the fire chance a bit and raise the citadel a tad bit but it will take a while since it would look bad to nerf a line so quickly.

Just a reminder that German destroyers were nerfed in the middle of finishing testing and being released.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,860
[NMKJT]
Beta Testers
24,800 posts
3,956 battles
Just now, awildpervert said:

hmm so what do you think they are going to do to 'em?

Nothing.

 

Because they're battleships.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
10,919 posts
4,873 battles
9 minutes ago, AraAragami said:

Just a reminder that German destroyers were nerfed in the middle of finishing testing and being released.

 

Well, that is what testing is for, isn't it? Granted, the changes to German DDs were a little late, but RN CLs and BBs were both changed in testing, weren't they? And dare I mention the Graf Zeppelin?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,490
[---]
Banned
6,739 posts
10,254 battles
Just now, RizeKamishiro said:

its gone to the point where i see KM BBs are HE spamming

I... you do realize that those people you saw were very likely firing HE before british BBs were even revealed right? don't blame braindead stupidity on the release of british BBs. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
165 posts
6,577 battles
Just now, Raptor_alcor said:

I... you do realize that those people you saw were very likely firing HE before british BBs were even revealed right? don't blame braindead stupidity on the release of british BBs. 

I have a doubt that at T9, they should know when to fire HE or AP

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,490
[---]
Banned
6,739 posts
10,254 battles
Just now, RizeKamishiro said:

I have a doubt that at T9, they should know when to fire HE or AP

Why would getting to tier 9 make them know how to do this? you can Literally have a 0% win rate in every single ship and STILL make it to tier 10 with enough time. I never understand this foolish misconception that higher tier means higher skill, all it means is the person spent enough time (and possibly real world money) to make their way up there. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,140
[MCWF]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
7,026 posts
29,155 battles
6 minutes ago, RizeKamishiro said:

I have a doubt that at T9, they should know when to fire HE or AP

No. I had enough T9 and T10 BB that only use HE all the match.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
165 posts
6,577 battles
Just now, Erebthoron said:

No. I had enough T9 and T10 BB that only use HE all the match.

 

6 minutes ago, Raptor_alcor said:

Why would getting to tier 9 make them know how to do this? you can Literally have a 0% win rate in every single ship and STILL make it to tier 10 with enough time. I never understand this foolish misconception that higher tier means higher skill, all it means is the person spent enough time (and possibly real world money) to make their way up there. 

well you guys might be right, but out of my 2000+ battles its a first for me

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,490
[---]
Banned
6,739 posts
10,254 battles
Just now, RizeKamishiro said:

 

well you guys might be right, but out of my 2000+ battles its a first for me

I really really hate to break this to you but experience is always a positive unless you LITTERALLY do null during the match. If I can crawl my way to tier 10 in co-op, earning about the same experience as a deep deep red player would on their average matches, they can do the same by being bad. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
165 posts
6,577 battles
Just now, Raptor_alcor said:

I really really hate to break this to you but experience is always a positive unless you LITTERALLY do null during the match. If I can crawl my way to tier 10 in co-op, earning about the same experience as a deep deep red player would on their average matches, they can do the same by being bad. 

I'd say im a below average player since i play other games to (war thunder). i might be one of those bad players lol ;0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,490
[---]
Banned
6,739 posts
10,254 battles
Just now, RizeKamishiro said:

I'd say im a below average player since i play other games to (war thunder). i might be one of those bad players lol ;0

I normally don't go through with this but going by WTR alone and not even considering other things you're average over all and your more recient matches is very slightly above average so, no, you aren't a bad player. (I also play WT so that doesn't mean much)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
444
[MPIRE]
Banned
1,662 posts
28,362 battles
17 minutes ago, RizeKamishiro said:

its gone to the point where i see KM BBs are HE spamming

if I have some high tier USN BB or Yamato bow taking me, I will absolutely fire HE with my GK.  The ammo selection is there for a reason and the GK's fire chance is pretty good.  I can't recall the exact number off the top of my head, but it's in the 40%s

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
444
[MPIRE]
Banned
1,662 posts
28,362 battles
14 minutes ago, Raptor_alcor said:

Why would getting to tier 9 make them know how to do this? you can Literally have a 0% win rate in every single ship and STILL make it to tier 10 with enough time. I never understand this foolish misconception that higher tier means higher skill, all it means is the person spent enough time (and possibly real world money) to make their way up there. 

Because time=practice=skill.  Of course there are some people who never learn and will fail their way up a line, but you can generally expect more knowledge and understanding of the game from players in higher tiers than many you will find in the low and mid tiers.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,116
[BOSS]
Beta Testers
2,762 posts
16,912 battles

I'm just gonna say I feel like there is too much mindless HE spam nonsense in this game already. No skill involved plunking HE at people and here we are, adding another line of HE spam nonsense.  Maybe they can make a ship that shoots for you so people can wipe their drool off with both hands while feeling good about themselves.

 

NOT IMPRESSED.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,490
[---]
Banned
6,739 posts
10,254 battles
Just now, Ju87s said:

Because time=practice=skill.  Of course there are some people who never learn and will fail their way up a line, but you can generally expect more knowledge and understanding of the game from players in higher tiers than many you will find in the low and mid tiers.

I do agree that logically that is true however there's a little hitch. Generally learning something that requires practice needs time and said practice for it to sink in. If someone doesn't play long enough nor care enough, skill is unlikely to show in any real valuable ammount. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×