Jump to content
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
GregL385

Great job on the Monarch WG

31 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

364
[BOTES]
Members
737 posts
4,635 battles

Because of your blatant incompetence and sheer laziness you stuck a t7 battleship at t8 with bigger guns and changed absolutely nothing else other than the layout. 

No extra range. No extra HP. No difference in AA...just a KGV with bigger guns that gets to go up against t10 CVs and battleships. 

What a god damn joke. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,334 posts
2,687 battles

Mongrel is a joke, she's a KGV hull copy and pasted with paper 15 inch guns, Nelsons turrets,lolmurica AA weaponry and post war cage mast.

 

She was a slapped together mess once WG figured out they can drop KGV to Tier 7 and milk the community for Nelson.

 

:Smile_facepalm:

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,118
[NDA]
Supertester
3,896 posts
1,477 battles

The discussion was that KGV was a Tier VIII ship with Tier VI guns.  She is, if anything, over-armored for Tier VII.   Monarch fits in Tier VIII quite well, especially with that RN Cruiser heal to balance out her low-ish hit points.  But sure, if you expect it to fit into that round hole you've got prepared for her in your mind, it won't fit.  So don't play it. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,708
[HINON]
WoWS Wiki Editor, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
6,498 posts
3,751 battles

Monarch is KGV as originally designed. KGV was originally supposed to be armed with 15" guns, but the WNT prevented that due to the weight and the had to go with the 14" guns instead.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
974 posts
1,871 battles

the Monarch has better armour than the KGV and has bigger guns with the same reload it has better AA is already fast and pretty stealthy for a BB it is a upgrade to the KGV in almost every thing

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,418
[HINON]
Supertester
7,520 posts
7,578 battles
1 minute ago, skull_122_steel said:

the Monarch has better armour than the KGV and has bigger guns with the same reload it has better AA is already fast and pretty stealthy for a BB it is a upgrade to the KGV in almost every thing

:Smile_great: this guy gets it.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,378
[HINON]
[HINON]
Members
4,964 posts
6,441 battles
42 minutes ago, GregL385 said:

Because of your blatant incompetence and sheer laziness you stuck a t7 battleship at t8 with bigger guns and changed absolutely nothing else other than the layout. 

No extra range. No extra HP. No difference in AA...just a KGV with bigger guns that gets to go up against t10 CVs and battleships. 

What a god damn joke. 

A1UpeFf.gif

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,942
[SYN]
Members
14,375 posts
10,239 battles

If I did the math right, Monarch has 10.95km max concealment

10.95km!

On a BB!

Sure, the guns are a bit crap, but you have better concealment than, pretty much, all the cruisers in your range.

Edited by MrDeaf
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,066
[SYN]
[SYN]
Members
6,676 posts
10,011 battles

Ah, even after the ship's released we'll still have the old KGV at T8 debate?

Oh well.

8 minutes ago, Doomlock said:

Monarch is KGV as originally designed. KGV was originally supposed to be armed with 15" guns, but the WNT prevented that due to the weight and the had to go with the 14" guns instead.

That's not quite right. It's more like Monarch is KGV's unborn half-sister, implemented in-game without a lot of the features she should have (different secondaries, hull length, powerplant).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
567
[HRDP]
Members
2,686 posts
8,117 battles

Honestly, I would say monarch is one of the balanced british BB's.\, and isnt freakishly OP the way Conqueror, Lion, or Orion are.

 

 

 

46 minutes ago, kerensky914 said:

The discussion was that KGV was a Tier VIII ship with Tier VI guns.  She is, if anything, over-armored for Tier VII.   Monarch fits in Tier VIII quite well, especially with that RN Cruiser heal to balance out her low-ish hit points.  But sure, if you expect it to fit into that round hole you've got prepared for her in your mind, it won't fit.  So don't play it. 

 

 

RN crusier heal is only on Lion and Conqueror. Monarch doesn't get it. She just gets normal BB heals.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,708
[HINON]
WoWS Wiki Editor, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
6,498 posts
3,751 battles
21 minutes ago, mofton said:

That's not quite right. It's more like Monarch is KGV's unborn half-sister, implemented in-game without a lot of the features she should have (different secondaries, hull length, powerplant).

The secondaries are the same, the powerplant is almost the same. Hull design and length etc, of course are different.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,066
[SYN]
[SYN]
Members
6,676 posts
10,011 battles
Just now, Doomlock said:

The secondaries are the same, the powerplant is almost the same. Hull design and length etc, of course are different.

Timing on 15-C suggests different secondaries, plus in-game 'Monarch' has an exact copy/paste of KGV's hull.

So she's pretending to be something she's not.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16
[SPUDS]
Members
147 posts
6,890 battles

This argument seems to be that because monarch isn't as OP as lion, conqueror, and orion that she needs buff. OK.....

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
113
[WOLFB]
Members
615 posts
21,816 battles

Just like the Izumo, in the IJN BB line, the Monarch is the one RN BB I didn't keep.

I am only missing 2 bb's from tier 6 to 10. Those are the 2!!!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,633
[INTEL]
Members
8,432 posts
25,306 battles

I was going to skip to monarch because KGV is so awful. But now I see I will have to save the free XP to get past the Monarch. Except do I really want to add more OP HE spamming BBs to the high tier MM pool? 

HE spamming BBs are an affront to gods and men.

 

What a sad waste. All that dev time invested to produce ships that have severely degraded the meta, and which are distorted shapes of actual battleships. Lower the fire chance, give them real AP and not gimped crap AP, and recolonize. Everything will be much improved. 

Edited by Taichunger

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
899
[LEGIO]
Members
2,956 posts
5,370 battles

Once I grind to Lion I plan on selling the Monarch and I don't usually sell higher tier BBs.

 

I can accept the probability that the that the secondary armament, powerplant, and hull length would have changed during the design process to match that of the actual KGV class but the post-war style lattice masts are hideously wrong, and the turret design is also wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
364
[BOTES]
Members
737 posts
4,635 battles
32 minutes ago, ValkyrWarframe said:

"It's not OP like the others, buff it more!"

Or how a bout the fact it doesnt belong there and should not be a carbon copy of a t7 ship sans guns. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×