Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.
Batwingsix

Something is missing from this patch....

12 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,014
[5D7]
Alpha Tester
2,716 posts
4,076 battles

As the title states... there is something familiar that isn't here with this patch, I must correct this.

 

Anyone else glad the wall hackers, aim bots, super sekret squirrel players have had their mods broken with the new patch?!

 

They stealth nerfed my ship! I used to get 1,523,521,561.23 citadels a game! Now the shells wont land near the target that I am aiming at! C'mon WG! Why stealth nerf ma ship?!

 

I like naval history about WWII and think that a certain underwater vessel should be added... it should have been in since launch! WG, when will we get these delicious blimpies / quiznos ships?!

 

 

Ahhhhh.... much better. Now it feels like patch day, no need to thank me folks.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,615
[SALVO]
Members
16,721 posts
17,314 battles
30 minutes ago, Batwingsix said:

 

 

I like naval history about WWII and think that a certain underwater vessel should be added... it should have been in since launch! WG, when will we get these delicious blimpies / quiznos ships?!

 

No!  Subs were primarily commerce raiders, not anti-combatant warships.  Did they sink warships from time to time?  Sure, but that simply was not their primary mission.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,418 posts
5,424 battles

I thought they were going to change the SMOKE Mechanics as depicted here huh????  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
360
[ARP2]
Members
1,224 posts
3,569 battles

I knew there was something missing from the forums today.  Thank you.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
274
[NGA-B]
Members
1,229 posts
7,662 battles
3 hours ago, Crucis said:

No!  Subs were primarily commerce raiders, not anti-combatant warships.  Did they sink warships from time to time?  Sure, but that simply was not their primary mission.

He was being sarcastic.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
443
[DETN8]
[DETN8]
Members
1,662 posts
16,122 battles
3 hours ago, dionkraft said:

I thought they were going to change the SMOKE Mechanics as depicted here huh????  

 

I think that's next patch.  They haven't had those changes tested yet.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4,615
[SALVO]
Members
16,721 posts
17,314 battles
9 hours ago, JediMasterDraco said:

He was being sarcastic.

Sarcasm doesn't translate well to the written word.  Particularly when I'm such a literal person to begin with.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
618
[WOLF1]
[WOLF1]
Members
2,765 posts
1,320 battles
12 hours ago, Crucis said:

No!  Subs were primarily commerce raiders, not anti-combatant warships.  Did they sink warships from time to time?  Sure, but that simply was not their primary mission.

Well, for everyone but the IJN.  For them, they prioritized warships over merchants.  

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,014
[5D7]
Alpha Tester
2,716 posts
4,076 battles
13 hours ago, JediMasterDraco said:

He was being sarcastic.

 

Shhhhh don't tell him

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×