Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
LittleWhiteMouse

Premium Ship Review: Graf Zeppelin

518 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,169
[HINON]
Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester
2,562 posts
4,805 battles

wow..  I was expecting a not great review but this is just amezeballs...   thank you LWM.. thank you.

M

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,857
[NMKJT]
Beta Testers
24,800 posts
3,912 battles

This is what happens when you try to develop a carrier that doesn't make battleship mains complain.

 

Also this is disappointing.

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,893
[HINON]
[HINON]
Wiki Lead, Beta Testers, Privateers
6,801 posts
5,213 battles

Holy moly, WG angered the Mouse, badly!

 

I'm with ya on that one Mouse this just leaves a bad taste in players mouths.

 

And here I thought we left this sort of thing behind us after the German DD fiasco...:Smile_sceptic:

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
37,084
[HINON]
Alpha Tester
26,501 posts
23,254 battles
1 minute ago, tcbaker777 said:

LWM just bashed WG for making a bad ship?

More for how WG is treating the ship.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
861
[SPITZ]
Beta Testers
7,130 posts
7,297 battles

So..And now for something entirely different.

 

The nose on that 109T seems too long to be an E model. And the prop shouldn't end in a point, it should be blunt ending, no 109E or later had that. 

 

 

 

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,169
[HINON]
Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester
2,562 posts
4,805 battles
4 minutes ago, Doomlock said:

And here I thought we left this sort of thing behind us after the German DD fiasco...:Smile_sceptic:

Hah!!!!   still not getting enthusiastic about the UK BB's until I see the actual release..  I am NOT convinced they will be released as is whether they are good bad or indifferent right now.   There seems to be a process in place with all the ships now...  drive the hype and get people ready to buy and then.........  hmmm  thats not what I thought was coming moment hits

Am loosing faith really really fast right now.

How long before WG actually realise that gimmicks is NOT the way forward in this game.

M

 

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
861
[SPITZ]
Beta Testers
7,130 posts
7,297 battles
Just now, MaliceA4Thought said:

How long before WG actually realise that gimmicks is NOT the way forward in this game.

To be fair, they dropped the Radar and nonsense from the RN BBs after people starting to say "How about you stop with the consumable gimmicks"

 

And Stealth stuff was already in the game, Just wasn't broadcasted, the USN Battleships at T8-9 are pretty stealthy when built for it. They just took that idea and actually made a line for it.

 

Which is fine.

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
3,043 posts
10,248 battles

Talk about a well-deserved broadside, right into the waterline of WG's paper hull, from the indomitable LittleWhiteMouse!

  • Cool 4

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
469
[JOLLY]
[JOLLY]
Alpha Tester
570 posts
5,603 battles

Reputation is indeed the most valuable asset in life.

We need years to get a good one and it takes seconds to lose it.

LWM just showed us that she does not compromise and always stick to the truth.

Well done LWM!!!

  • Cool 11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
21
[OVRPN]
Members
0 posts

Besides the thoroughly crap interface what ruins CV game play is all these nation specific drop patterns. ships don't fire their main guns in odd patterns based on nation. torpedoes are only different when on RN ships. So whats with the relentless reliance on idiotic gimmicks? CVs should differ primarily in which load out is good, not based on pattern matching

  • Cool 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
186
[RQL]
Beta Testers
717 posts
23,752 battles

LWM, thank you for the update.  Not being a CV player, I was not panning on buying any new premium CVs and held off on the Enterprise.  The CV player base should thank you for such a direct and precise post not to mention your to the point direction.   Keep up the good work.

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,263 posts
13,901 battles
25 minutes ago, LittleWhiteMouse said:
Graf Zeppelin has had a very troubled development history and I do not have confidence that they can patch this ship to make it an enjoyable or compelling choice for players based on the design decisions so far implemented.

 

Languishing in development hell for a long time, and the only action it will get to see is moving from port to port. +1 to WG for historical accuracy. :cap_book:

  • Cool 16

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14,293
[WOLF5]
Members
33,576 posts
28,384 battles
18 minutes ago, Sakuzhi said:

So..And now for something entirely different.

 

The nose on that 109T seems too long to be an E model. And the prop shouldn't end in a point, it should be blunt ending, no 109E or later had that. 

 

 

 

 

 

We don't have OS2U Kingfishers but have stuff like F4F Wildcats as catapult fighters :cap_cool:

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,893
[HINON]
[HINON]
Wiki Lead, Beta Testers, Privateers
6,801 posts
5,213 battles

And thus, Graf Zeppelingate has begun.

 

Sigh I do not like where this may end up. :Smile_sad:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×