icuOklaCity

WG'ing needs/has To Do Something With Players Who Refuse to Engage in Rank

  • You need to play a total of 5 battles to post in this section.

37 posts in this topic

Actually, someone was banned a while ago for that. The guy who was basically pressing W and firing a few shots every match, at times 30 to 40 a day, to get participation XP.


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Strachwitz666 said:

Unless y'all are certain of the name of the player. the "because I am spotted" ,  probably not a unique occurrence ,even to add a type of DD(Shino). You talk of 0 points or low score, the Okcity dude obviously had a high score.

I'm certain.  


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Compassghost said:

Actually, someone was banned a while ago for that. The guy who was basically pressing W and firing a few shots every match, at times 30 to 40 a day, to get participation XP.

 

AFKing is not the same as "refusing to fight".


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Another OP who's too dim to understand ranked is just random with extra rewards. 


2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

33 minutes ago, issm said:

 

AFKing is not the same as "refusing to fight".

 

Sorry, but driving your boat and firing are not AFK.

 

He was banned and quit shortly after when he realized he had to try during off-season.

Edited by Compassghost

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited) · Report post

47 minutes ago, Compassghost said:

 

Sorry, but driving your boat and firing are not AFK.

 

He was banned and quit shortly after when he realized he had to try during off-season.

 

And that also happens to not be what OP is complaining about.

 

If he was banned for afking, he was banned for actual AFKing - not because people complained, which is what the first response in this thread thought should happen.

Edited by issm

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
38 minutes ago, issm said:

 

And that also happens to not be what OP is complaining about.

 

If he was banned for afking, he was banned for actual AFKing - not because people complained, which is what the first response in this thread thought should happen.

The player was banned for *passive play* because he was always at the controls as he crashed his ship into the middle and died.


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, Compassghost said:

The player was banned for *passive play* because he was always at the controls as he crashed his ship into the middle and died.

 

Love to see the specifics of the case then.

 

Could probably appeal that.


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
55 minutes ago, issm said:

 

Love to see the specifics of the case then.

 

Could probably appeal that.

 

 


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Compassghost said:

 

 

 

It appears to me that a WG employee made an extremely vague statement, which everyone for some reason decided to interpret as "LOL, HE'S BEEN BANNED".


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, issm said:

 

It appears to me that a WG employee made an extremely vague statement, which everyone for some reason decided to interpret as "LOL, HE'S BEEN BANNED".

We tracked his games played. He played every single day up until that post. After that, he stopped playing.


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Compassghost said:

We tracked his games played. He played every single day up until that post. After that, he stopped playing.

 

Thing is.... he wasn't banned for refusing to fight.

 

What he did violated a very specific rule: Repetitive passive play for the sake of grinding exp.

 

That sounds quite different from what OP is complaining about.


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.