Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
HBZK100

Idea Crafting: Allow Captains To Adjust Reserves

11 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

Members
1,482 posts
2,386 battles

What are yall's thoughts on this? Adjusting the amount of reserves between all three types of planes could be very beneficial depending on what strategy your trying to use. Now, there would be limits, so you wouldn't be able to just put all reserves into torpedo bombers say. But it would be nice to have a little bit of tweaking to the reserves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,940
[ASHIP]
Members
5,454 posts
12,933 battles

Possibly as a step in toward a larger change. On it's own, it seems counter-intuitive to what WG has already been doing. They seem to adjust what you have with intention toward what the ship should have as focus. The most obvious example would be enterprise, which is why you're making this thread probably.

 

I have seen people suggest allowing control of your reserves as part of also allowing what you can launch in a match on the fly (with limitations)

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9,503
[GWG]
[GWG]
Alpha Tester
29,317 posts
15,806 battles

While the loadout options have desperately needed work from the beginning what would happen with this is one really good option and many bad ones.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,380
[NG-NL]
Members
7,182 posts
12,779 battles

US CVs are probably alone in needing this. Shift to something like 3/0/3 so they can pose a threat to a Taiho and enough DB to be dangerous.

 

IJN CVs are fine as is with loadout options.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,482 posts
2,386 battles
2 hours ago, Reymu said:

US CVs are probably alone in needing this. Shift to something like 3/0/3 so they can pose a threat to a Taiho and enough DB to be dangerous.

 

IJN CVs are fine as is with loadout options.

I can see essex and Midway having a 3/0/3, then having a 2/1/3 as balanced/strike. That would be cool.

However, would two fighters be OP for those carriers?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,380
[NG-NL]
Members
7,182 posts
12,779 battles
3 hours ago, HBZK100 said:

I can see essex and Midway having a 3/0/3, then having a 2/1/3 as balanced/strike. That would be cool.

However, would two fighters be OP for those carriers?

2 fighters will not withstand 7 squadrons.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
167
[PNGYN]
Alpha Tester
1,526 posts
3,480 battles

as long as i can custom swap for versatility. IJN carriers can do that very well atm which explains their above average win rates and that infuriates/annoys me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
160
[INK3S]
Beta Testers
1,817 posts
6,780 battles
On 7/2/2017 at 9:01 AM, HBZK100 said:

What are yall's thoughts on this? Adjusting the amount of reserves between all three types of planes could be very beneficial depending on what strategy your trying to use. Now, there would be limits, so you wouldn't be able to just put all reserves into torpedo bombers say. But it would be nice to have a little bit of tweaking to the reserves.

Yes, please.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
3,256 posts
4,322 battles

What about giving every cv a stock loadout then the modules could adjust reserves. Ie strike = kaga style reserves while enterprise = as style reserves.

 

That would allow load balancing to be easier while still allowing the player to customize the reserves to their play style. It would also allow more room for special loadouts for premiums as well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×