Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Carrier_Ikoma

Enterprise finally in the store

54 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

870
[A-D]
Beta Testers, Alpha Tester
2,638 posts

...with no updated reviews of her, I'm curious to hear what those that have played her think.

 

Just for fun...

 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
323
[KOOKS]
Alpha Tester
2,869 posts
4,864 battles

Great...now I have more than Shokaku to worry about when grinding my Lex...

...though teams might be able to take care of themselves better...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
870
[A-D]
Beta Testers, Alpha Tester
2,638 posts
5 minutes ago, renegadestatuz said:

iChase put out a review on her yesterday.

...so he did, guess I missed it or it wasn't posted around. Off to watch that then

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,244
Alpha Tester
4,156 posts
8,061 battles

LOL $60 for Enterprise?  For this pile?  What joke is this.  That's nearly a 50% increase in price over the Saipan, which is the same price as the tier 7 BB Scharnhorst.  Yet for some reason Enterprise costs more than Tirpitz, already the most expensive premium in the shop normally.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,380
[NG-NL]
Members
7,182 posts
12,779 battles

Probably won't bother. Without the bomber HP module, her T7 planes are largely useless against high tier AA, and that TB drop is beyond stupid.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers
2,589 posts
8,799 battles
4 minutes ago, Seraphil said:

LOL $60 for Enterprise?  For this pile?  What joke is this.  That's nearly a 50% increase in price over the Saipan, which is the same price as the tier 7 BB Scharnhorst.  Yet for some reason Enterprise costs more than Tirpitz, already the most expensive premium in the shop normally.

It's a CV. CVs are typically more expensive. 

  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,244
Alpha Tester
4,156 posts
8,061 battles
3 minutes ago, Show_Me_Your_Cits said:

It's a CV. CVs are typically more expensive. 

I just pointed out the tier 7 Saipan is the same price as the tier 7 Scharnhorst.  And in the tech tree, tier 8 CVs are cheaper than tier 8 BBs.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
2,632 posts
10,276 battles
12 minutes ago, Reymu said:

Probably won't bother. Without the bomber HP module, her T7 planes are largely useless against high tier AA, and that TB drop is beyond stupid.

Just FYI, the wiki and the announcement page both say she gets access to the bomber HP module.

 

Doesn't fix the torpedo drop, but does buff up the planes significantly to around Lex levels.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
870
[A-D]
Beta Testers, Alpha Tester
2,638 posts
2 minutes ago, _Rumple_ said:

CV hell weekend; gonna find something else to do...

Take out an AA ship... ~.^

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
320
[AARG]
Beta Testers
1,249 posts

Yeah, no....$79 Canadian isn't worth it for the ship. Think i'll buy Marblehead instead, as it's the only other US premium ship I dont have.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,244
Alpha Tester
4,156 posts
8,061 battles
Just now, Adm_Nate_Ellis937 said:

Yeah, no....$79 Canadian isn't worth it for the ship. Think i'll buy Marblehead instead, as it's the only other US premium ship I dont have.

I wouldn't pay even $5 for Marblehead.  It's that unfun a ship.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,260
Members
2,992 posts
5,204 battles

So usn tech tree CVs are either all AS or all strike, and usn premium CVs are either face melting or face palming.

giphy.gif

Edited by cometguy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
320
[AARG]
Beta Testers
1,249 posts
20 minutes ago, Seraphil said:

I wouldn't pay even $5 for Marblehead.  It's that unfun a ship.

It's basically an Omaha with longer torpedo range eh?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
4,050 posts

I will have to think about it.  I hate the CV play, I have a Saipan, I like that one.  Enterprise would be fun to play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
-Members-
1,187 posts
26,928 battles

It's quite disturbing that the ichase review didn't really have anything bad in it other than what HE didn't like AND LWM's review is not up yet and the Big E is for sale.  I find this very strange and have to wonder if WG put a hold on letting LWM post her review until after the ship is for sale.  I hope to god I am wrong, but it sure looks funny.  It just looks to me like that they are getting the impulse buyers before an honest and true review is posted. If this is true, shame on WG.  I am also curious to know if ALL reviews by community contributors and super testers get reviewed by WG before they post?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
581
[-N-]
Members
2,288 posts
15,955 battles

I am going to have to think long and hard after watching iChase's last video on her.  I like CVs but if I am going to get double up tiered to T10 alot I don't know I can say yes to spending the money.    Especially with that funky torp pattern.  AP Bombs look great against German BBs but not much else.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,026
[NATO]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
2,665 posts
10,501 battles

I played against one in my Shokaku, his team won but only by the slimmest of margins, 2-3 more seconds and my last torp drop would have connected, changing the pts total back in my favour. Not sure what his damage total was, mine was the typical (for me) 90k+ when in a tier 8/9 battle, but the big E did bag over 30 of my planes and performed well vs my fighters.  That was before the module buff!

 

and $80 Canadian....erm....no. Not until I know that it can perform in a tier 10 environment. I paid about that for Tirpitz when it was first released and I can do quite well in a tier 10 fight, and that was before the needless overbuff of the secondaries.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
581
[-N-]
Members
2,288 posts
15,955 battles
2 minutes ago, BaronVonTom said:

It's quite disturbing that the ichase review didn't really have anything bad in it other than what HE didn't like AND LWM's review is not up yet and the Big E is for sale.  I find this very strange and have to wonder if WG put a hold on letting LWM post her review until after the ship is for sale.  I hope to god I am wrong, but it sure looks funny.  It just looks to me like that they are getting the impulse buyers before an honest and true review is posted. If this is true, shame on WG.  I am also curious to know if ALL reviews by community contributors and super testers get reviewed by WG before they post?

This would not surprise me.  Though let's hope it is LWM being on vacation maybe,

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49
[FEM]
Members
164 posts
4,404 battles
2 minutes ago, BaronVonTom said:

find this very strange and have to wonder if WG put a hold on letting LWM post her review until after the ship is for sale.

 

She said they did not

 

clicky click

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,719 posts
4,106 battles
3 minutes ago, BaronVonTom said:

It's quite disturbing that the ichase review didn't really have anything bad in it other than what HE didn't like AND LWM's review is not up yet and the Big E is for sale.  I find this very strange and have to wonder if WG put a hold on letting LWM post her review until after the ship is for sale.  I hope to god I am wrong, but it sure looks funny.  It just looks to me like that they are getting the impulse buyers before an honest and true review is posted. If this is true, shame on WG.  I am also curious to know if ALL reviews by community contributors and super testers get reviewed by WG before they post?

 

Honestly many of us who are going to buy her right off are collectors anyways

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×