Tier X BBs True and Complete Size?

[BrunoSchezer]

Well, now, with the new british BB on the horizon, i want answers about something i was searching long time ago: the true size (length, beam and draft) of our BBs of Tier X, but sure, you will say: wth, you dont know the size of the Yamato and Montana at least?. Yes, i know the size of both, but, i have issues with the Kurfust (i know is a mix of the H-40B and H-41, if IRC, but i can only speculate the correct size), then, my lack of knowgeless about the coming british one is a factor i want to solve, then why i am requesting help in this manner, just for know a bit more and for another secret reason (well, not too secret, just a "investigation" to know how big and "realistic" could be a BB and if those parameters fit with our BBs and what could be the limit size that make a realistic BB become a fantasy and impractical one.

Well, lets start:

Yamato: 263m (862ft ) / 38.9m (127ft) / 11m (36ft)

Montana: 280.80m (921ft ) / 36.93m (121ft) / 11m (36ft)

Kurfust: ? m (?ft) / ? m (?ft) / ? m (?ft)

Conqueror: ? m (?ft) / ? m (?ft) / ? m (?ft)

And this samples of size, wich one is realistic and wich one is fantasy/impractical for you?

Sample 1: 320m (1049ft) / 41m (134ft) / 11.93m (39ft)

Sample 2: 312m (1023ft) / 40m (131ft) / 11m (36ft)

Sample 3: 296m (971ft) / 40.2m (131ft) / 10.8m (35ft)

I will apreciate the effort for this.

[Dictonary]

5 minutes ago, BrunoSchezer said:

Well, now, with the new british BB on the horizon, i want answers about something i was searching long time ago: the true size (length, beam and draft) of our BBs of Tier X, but sure, you will say: wth, you dont know the size of the Yamato and Montana at least?. Yes, i know the size of both, but, i have issues with the Kurfust (i know is a mix of the H-40B and H-41, if IRC, but i can only speculate the correct size), then, my lack of knowgeless about the coming british one is a factor i want to solve, then why i am requesting help in this manner, just for know a bit more and for another secret reason (well, not too secret, just a "investigation" to know how big and "realistic" could be a BB and if those parameters fit with our BBs and what could be the limit size that make a realistic BB become a fantasy and impractical one.

Well, lets start:

Yamato: 263m (862ft ) / 38.9m (127ft) / 11m (36ft)

Montana: 280.80m (921ft ) / 36.93m (121ft) / 11m (36ft)

Kurfust: ? m (?ft) / ? m (?ft) / ? m (?ft)

Conqueror: ? m (?ft) / ? m (?ft) / ? m (?ft)

And this samples of size, wich one is realistic and wich one is fantasy/impractical for you?

Sample 1: 320m (1049ft) / 41m (134ft) / 11.93m (39ft)

Sample 2: 312m (1023ft) / 40m (131ft) / 11m (36ft)

Sample 3: 296m (971ft) / 40.2m (131ft) / 10.8m (35ft)

I will apreciate the effort for this.

For Kurfust, default to H-41 measurements. It was modified to have its armament in WoWS due to two reasons: one, WG promised that there would be no guns bigger than the Yamato and two, having only 8 guns is going to be a pain. At least that was what I was told. I could be wrong but I am pretty sure.

[BrunoSchezer]

2 hours ago, Dictonary said:

For Kurfust, default to H-41 measurements. It was modified to have its armament in WoWS due to two reasons: one, WG promised that there would be no guns bigger than the Yamato and two, having only 8 guns is going to be a pain. At least that was what I was told. I could be wrong but I am pretty sure.

Mmmm, then, what about the Conqueror? and wich sample you think is the best?