Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
capncrunch21

Warspite sitting too high in water

9 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,519
[SIMP]
Members
1,747 posts

The British battleship Warspite is sitting too high in the water. 

The black line at its waterline should be completely submerged below the waterline.

The ship needs to be lowered in the water until the black line isn't visible. This would be the Warspite's proper position.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,013
[BONKS]
[BONKS]
Beta Testers
1,451 posts
15,401 battles

After *probably* a year of requests, they did lower it a while back.

 

It used to sit even higher. 

 

Maybe another year of lobbying will do the trick?

 

EDIT: I dug up the old info. https://worldofwarships.com/en/content/update-notes-main/release-notes-059/

0a2b276fa251e05bbb32e8431bd13675.png

 

Edited by DOCTOR_CITADEL
Added link to old patch notes.
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,367
[HINON]
[HINON]
Beta Testers
5,913 posts
5,645 battles
17 minutes ago, DOCTOR_CITADEL said:

After *probably* a year of requests, they did lower it a while back.

 

It used to sit even higher. 

 

Maybe another year of lobbying will do the trick?

 

EDIT: I dug up the old info. https://worldofwarships.com/en/content/update-notes-main/release-notes-059/

0a2b276fa251e05bbb32e8431bd13675.png

 

Beat me to it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,884
[D-DAY]
Members
7,664 posts
1 hour ago, capncrunch21 said:

The British battleship Warspite is sitting too high in the water. 

The black line at its waterline should be completely submerged below the waterline.

The ship needs to be lowered in the water until the black line isn't visible. This would be the Warspite's proper position.

If this is to do with its historical look then ok, however, if it is to do with stating its too high so its not performing well that would be incorrect.

The Warspite sits in the top 5 in WR for tier VI (27 ships), along with the 2nd highest damage. It also sits at no.5 for survival as well. (This is for the last 2 weeks of play). :Smile_honoring:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
398
[SIMP]
Members
1,518 posts
12,921 battles

The Warspite sat just as he describes - watch the Jingles video and it is obvious that it was correct at the time Jingles made the video

Then - they made it super high in the water

Then - they made it too high in the water

 

They broke it for no reason and seem to loathe the idea of returning it to where it should normally be...

 

Fix it please!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
398
[SIMP]
Members
1,518 posts
12,921 battles
On 6/24/2017 at 9:31 AM, DOCTOR_CITADEL said:

After *probably* a year of requests, they did lower it a while back.

 

It used to sit even higher. 

 

Maybe another year of lobbying will do the trick?

 

EDIT: I dug up the old info. https://worldofwarships.com/en/content/update-notes-main/release-notes-059/

0a2b276fa251e05bbb32e8431bd13675.png

 

The shells mentioned in that post was completely wrong, the shells mentioned are for Kriegsmarine guns

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,013
[BONKS]
[BONKS]
Beta Testers
1,451 posts
15,401 battles
16 minutes ago, _cthulhu_ said:

The shells mentioned in that post was completely wrong, the shells mentioned are for Kriegsmarine guns

 

I wouldn't know.

 

I was only referring to the issue with the Warspite's draft in particular. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
398
[SIMP]
Members
1,518 posts
12,921 battles
7 hours ago, DOCTOR_CITADEL said:

 

I wouldn't know.

 

I was only referring to the issue with the Warspite's draft in particular. 

SpGr stands for SprengGranate which is Deutsche high explosive.

For reference:

 

Edited by _cthulhu_

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×