1,340 [NDA] Jinxed_Katajainen Alpha Tester 6,193 posts 4,955 battles Report post #1 Posted June 18, 2017 Source: http://jbbs.shitaraba.net/bbs/read.cgi/netgame/9027/1495107641/54 Some stuff from WGJ Friendship day in Nagoya - Different RNBBs drafts are being considered, but nothing set in stone - ASMs are at a dead end for now - Pan Asia tree is being researched. Avoiding being a clone of other tree ships. Luda class for tier 10 if ASMs can be implemented? Otherwise may need to find an alternative - BBVs and CAVs: We (WGJ) are telling HQ that fans want them, but no further info on them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,848 [ARRGG] CLUCH_CARGO [ARRGG] Members 5,770 posts Report post #2 Posted June 18, 2017 Domo arrigato Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,662 [CALM] YamatoA150 Beta Testers 6,838 posts 6,088 battles Report post #3 Posted June 18, 2017 (edited) That's complete B$ that they're considering guided missile ships at all. Just do clones and be content with it. Edited June 18, 2017 by YamatoA150 Guided Missile Ships for Pan-Asians only is blatant Chinese pandering Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,092 [TOG] Bill_Halsey Members 4,758 posts 34,565 battles Report post #4 Posted June 18, 2017 ASM's? That'll make it really fire and forget. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,478 [HINON] renegadestatuz Members 7,656 posts 9,539 battles Report post #5 Posted June 18, 2017 2 minutes ago, Bill_Halsey said: ASM's? That'll make it really fire and forget. No kidding. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
227 [SPTR] SullyQuindarius Members 2,462 posts 3,947 battles Report post #6 Posted June 18, 2017 The day they add ASMs is the day I leave high tiers for good... There's no way they are actually going to put ASMs in the game. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
258 My_Other_Car_Is_A_Tank Beta Testers 964 posts 2,130 battles Report post #7 Posted June 18, 2017 God... ASMs... Please no. If they need that much of a gimmick to make PanAsia work I don't even want it. BBVs and CAVs are something that I could see working though, yet we still have no word on Tone, who we know already exists ingame... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2,750 [FOXEH] Kitsunelegend Beta Testers 6,103 posts 1,313 battles Report post #8 Posted June 18, 2017 ...ASMs...? Seriously? Please, for the love of god, don't add those things. Keep this game strictly WWI/WWII with conventional weapons in ALL tiers. We don't need nor want freaking ASMs in this game. They'd be completely and utterly broken and OP or completely and utterly useless. There is no middle ground with them. 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
105 dangerhamster Members 270 posts 85 battles Report post #9 Posted June 18, 2017 The ASM message is somewhat disturbing. They have worked out that they can't be shoehorned in, but if some eejit comes up with a way that appears "fun" and "engaging" they would roll with it..... Please for the love of Bob WG just stop thinking about it. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,092 [TOG] Bill_Halsey Members 4,758 posts 34,565 battles Report post #10 Posted June 18, 2017 If they make it into another game series where all the ships have ASM's, then yeah that'll be doable. putting it into the current game..too broken Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
98 saru_richard Members 571 posts 4,688 battles Report post #11 Posted June 19, 2017 ASM's? are you kidding me? thats the last thing this game needs in its current state (also what are BBV's and CAV"s?) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,478 [HINON] renegadestatuz Members 7,656 posts 9,539 battles Report post #12 Posted June 19, 2017 3 minutes ago, saru_richard said: ASM's? are you kidding me? thats the last thing this game needs in its current state (also what are BBV's and CAV"s?) BBV is aviation battleship and CAV is aviation cruiser. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
75 Suzunami Beta Testers 648 posts 15,736 battles Report post #13 Posted June 19, 2017 34 minutes ago, saru_richard said: (also what are BBV's and CAV"s?) only couple of them were ever built, all IJN ships: Isei, Hyuga, Tone, Chikuma, Mogami. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
116 intixw Members 309 posts Report post #14 Posted June 19, 2017 8 hours ago, Bill_Halsey said: ASM's? That'll make it really fire and forget. Not really? I mean, early guided weapons were either wire guided, like the Fritz X, or could only be guided to hit a specific location, like the V2 It's no more fire and forget than main battery gunfire..... gameplay wise, they seem like they'd be like using a torpedo that you had to watch the whole time. 8 hours ago, YamatoA150 said: That's complete B$ that they're considering guided missile ships at all. Just do clones and be content with it. Why is it bull? A carrier is basically a guided missile cruiser, except worse. Missiles don't spot, and you can't retarget them after you've fired. 8 hours ago, Kitsunelegend said: ...ASMs...? Seriously? Please, for the love of god, don't add those things. Keep this game strictly WWI/WWII with conventional weapons in ALL tiers. We don't need nor want freaking ASMs in this game. Guided weapons are historical for WW2. Many of the ships in this game are not. 8 hours ago, Kitsunelegend said: They'd be completely and utterly broken and OP or completely and utterly useless. There is no middle ground with them. Don't we already have one of these? 2 entire lines of them? People seem to really love them as well. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
517 Trainspite Members 1,587 posts Report post #15 Posted June 19, 2017 31 minutes ago, Shokaku_1 said: only couple of them were ever built, all IJN ships: Isei, Hyuga, Tone, Chikuma, Mogami. The Swedes say hi hej. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,678 Cruxdei Beta Testers 4,735 posts 7,019 battles Report post #16 Posted June 19, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Trainspite said: The Swedes say hi hej. if we are following the "nations that built CAVs" the russians are the only country with CAVs nowadays. Edited June 19, 2017 by Cruxdei Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
221 [NNC] Jakajan Members 1,186 posts 22,147 battles Report post #17 Posted June 19, 2017 50 minutes ago, Cruxdei said: if we are following the "nations that built CAVs" the russians are the only country with CAVs nowadays. Then we will have them. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,678 Cruxdei Beta Testers 4,735 posts 7,019 battles Report post #18 Posted June 19, 2017 2 minutes ago, Jakajan said: Then we will have them. the western dogs laughed at our lack of ships capable of delivering aircraft for the last time. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
1,340 [NDA] Jinxed_Katajainen Alpha Tester 6,193 posts 4,955 battles Report post #19 Posted June 19, 2017 Found some more info on a blogger's post who attended. Highschool Fleet ships confirmed for sale 6/30 (Asia server) Enterprise on sale early July (Asia server) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
