Jump to content
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Carrier_Lexington

Big E on the way

60 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

992
[HELLS]
Members
2,971 posts
41,666 battles

We shall see how the RN DD gets implemented at any rate. As much as I like the Enterprise for her history, I am not into CVs at all. I have o-n-e Russian ship in my port that I got for free in a challenge mission campaign. that I play in PvP about once a month. I am not into the VMF and its' paper ships at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2,596
[-KIA-]
Banned
9,382 posts
29,095 battles

I am not into the VMF and its' paper ships at all.

I love how people automatically presume Russian ships are paper instead of just themselves being uninformed of its existence...

Edited by TenguBlade

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,367
Members
2,688 posts
4,560 battles

Cmon! :D  I'm banking that Enterprise has the new weapons!

 

Didn't they say they were going to try out a new weapon system on the Enterprises planes?  I thought I remembered it being on fighters but I am probably wrong.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
167
[PNGYN]
Alpha Tester
1,526 posts
3,480 battles

i hope if there will be a non-premium version of the yorktown. CV-6 enterprise was part of the Yorktown class carriers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
107
[SIMNZ]
Members
767 posts
8,219 battles

i hope if there will be a non-premium version of the yorktown. CV-6 enterprise was part of the Yorktown class carriers

 

If and when they add a second carrier branch, Yorktown will likely be a Tier 8.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,041
[NATO]
Beta Testers, In AlfaTesters
2,691 posts
10,760 battles

 

If and when they add a second carrier branch, Yorktown will likely be a Tier 8.

 

Not too many 'real' carriers would be in that tree. Wasp, Yorktown/Hornet, perhaps early production Essex with reduced quad 40's compliment, but thats about it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
107
[SIMNZ]
Members
767 posts
8,219 battles

 

Not too many 'real' carriers would be in that tree. Wasp, Yorktown/Hornet, perhaps early production Essex with reduced quad 40's compliment, but thats about it.

 

I had a post a while back suggesting splitting into conversions and purpose-built types. (Conversions: Independence-Sangamon-Lexington, purpose-built: Wasp-Ranger-Yorktown.) The split would be at T6. Then after T8, option 1 would leave things as is, with both lines going back at T9, option 2 would have Iowa and Montana conversions for the conversion line, while Essex and Midway would be in the purpose-built line. While I'm at it, I also heard the Enterprise would get five-plane squads in a 2-2-2 loadout. I hope that's true, but we won't know what we're getting till we get it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
4,252 posts
9,421 battles

A US T8 premium CV?

 So what?

Not interested.

I already have a US T9 CV.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,000
[HINON]
[HINON]
Members
4,023 posts
5,071 battles

A US T8 premium CV?

 So what?

Not interested.

I already have a US T9 CV.

 

I'm interested, and I have Midway.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17
Members
87 posts
6,132 battles

It's not so much that it is a T8 CV it's more of what CV it is. @aethervox The Enterprise basically won the war in the pacific and without her there is a strong chance we would've lost. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
167
[PNGYN]
Alpha Tester
1,526 posts
3,480 battles

They goes tier 8 if the enterprise is anything like the saipan in terms of balance

 

i just found out courtesy of iChase that Enterprise's aircraft are T7. most ships that are of T8 (the tier Yorktown and Lexington are in) go up against range from T8 to T10 and they have strong AA capabilities. so WG better buff that thing up more plus increase its plane reserves cuz in those matches you WILL lose a lot of planes so you better HAVE replacements

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
270
[-YK0-]
Members
1,041 posts
13,696 battles

 

i just found out courtesy of iChase that Enterprise's aircraft are T7. most ships that are of T8 (the tier Yorktown and Lexington are in) go up against range from T8 to T10 and they have strong AA capabilities. so WG better buff that thing up more plus increase its plane reserves cuz in those matches you WILL lose a lot of planes so you better HAVE replacements

 

Not necessarily.  The Kaga has T6 planes and she does okay.  If anything WG can simply increase the size of the squadrons and reserves and she'd be a pretty strong ship.  I'd love for her to have a 2/2/2 layout.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
114
[NLIST]
Members
618 posts
8,201 battles

I just saw the torpedo drop pattern on the Enterprise from Flamu's Twitch streams. It's... gimmicky. I mean, the torp drops look worse than the Kaga's. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
167
[PNGYN]
Alpha Tester
1,526 posts
3,480 battles

 

Not necessarily.  The Kaga has T6 planes and she does okay.  If anything WG can simply increase the size of the squadrons and reserves and she'd be a pretty strong ship.  I'd love for her to have a 2/2/2 layout.  

 

same here gives overpowered as fuk shocucku something to think about

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,000
[HINON]
[HINON]
Members
4,023 posts
5,071 battles

 

Not necessarily.  The Kaga has T6 planes and she does okay.  If anything WG can simply increase the size of the squadrons and reserves and she'd be a pretty strong ship.  I'd love for her to have a 2/2/2 layout.  

 

Kaga doesn't see Tier 10.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
167
[PNGYN]
Alpha Tester
1,526 posts
3,480 battles

I just saw the torpedo drop pattern on the Enterprise from Flamu's Twitch streams. It's... gimmicky. I mean, the torp drops look worse than the Kaga's. 

 

that doesnt sound good

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
114
[NLIST]
Members
618 posts
8,201 battles

Now, on his second run on the Enterprise he got 44 plane kills and around 1,800 base XP (he won). But he only did about 60K damage because the first two games of the Enterprise were uptiered. Also another fun fact, the Montana can wipe out half of the torpedo bomber squadrons before they make a drop. 

 

It seems that the Enterprise is meant for fighter dominance with its unusually large amount of fighter reserves. It can even fight against an AS Lexington, as Flamu has done. 

 

 

EDIT:  It's a W-shaped drop and you can't reliably hit DD's that way!

Edited by AdmiralMudkip

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
167
[PNGYN]
Alpha Tester
1,526 posts
3,480 battles

Now, on his second run on the Enterprise he got 44 plane kills and around 1,800 base XP (he won). But he only did about 60K damage because the first two games of the Enterprise were uptiered. Also another fun fact, the Montana can wipe out half of the torpedo bomber squadrons before they make a drop. 

 

It seems that the Enterprise is meant for fighter dominance with its unusually large amount of fighter reserves. It can even fight against an AS Lexington, as Flamu has done. 

 

 

EDIT:  It's a W-shaped drop and you can't reliably hit DD's that way!

 

looks like WG need to change the planes from T7 to either T8,T9 or T10 then. cuz in my experience with lexy strike T8 matches i go up against T8 to T10 ships and they got fuking strong AA guns i sh*t you not
Edited by The_Big_Red_1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
114
[NLIST]
Members
618 posts
8,201 battles

I would also say that none of Flamu's Enterprise games have him on 1st place on XP count. He's lucky if he made it to top 3.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
167
[PNGYN]
Alpha Tester
1,526 posts
3,480 battles

I would also say that none of Flamu's Enterprise games have him on 1st place on XP count. He's lucky if he made it to top 3.

 

which is why WG need to buff Big E more then with the way IJN carriers are cuking USN carriers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×