Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
SinqueScheiDeMona

Can friendly ship ramming be considered just like ramming the enemy?

41 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

1,478
[HINON]
Members
7,656 posts
9,539 battles

You want allied ships to outright delete each other when they get a little frisky?

 

Hell no. 

I can imagine the salty forum posts and threads now :D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
[HINON]
Members
2,642 posts
7,936 battles

You want allied ships to outright delete each other when they get a little frisky?

 

yICNQm.png

 

Also, no... let's keep the ramming mechanics as is for Green-on-Green rams

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,431
[NO2BB]
Members
3,885 posts
24,515 battles

Basically the future if this gets implemented:

cDSEo9X.png?1

 kinda want

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Alpha Tester
2,902 posts
6,252 battles

No...  But make enemy ramming like friendly ramming...

 

I mean don't get me wrong, I like ramming, but a BB in full reverse and another in full reverse just barely scraping bow paint resulting in a mass explosion...  Wish they'd rework it so the lightest touch didn't result in instant death.  Scrape paint, damage tick down...  But you cleave a BB in half with the bow of your BB, yeah big Boom.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
719
[UFFA]
Beta Testers
3,784 posts
5,102 battles

You want allied ships to outright delete each other when they get a little frisky?

 

Hell no. 

 

They do already when they don't pay attention to where they fire torpedoes or rounds. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,150
[HINON]
Privateers
6,266 posts
3,405 battles

No. I don't want to be punished for my friendly friskiness.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,544
[PSA]
Members
5,118 posts
3,754 battles

Given the number of friendly brush ups at the start of the match, I foresee the average game lasting all of two minutes;)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
707 posts
4,742 battles

No. Nyet. Nein. Non. Ne. Nei.

 

The last thing I want is for a cruiser with tunnel vision to detonate my magazine instead of scraping the paint.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
719
[UFFA]
Beta Testers
3,784 posts
5,102 battles

Given the number of friendly brush ups at the start of the match, I foresee the average game lasting all of two minutes;)

 

Just make it extended contact then or up the damage exponentially over time that contact is maintained. It's only enjoyable for one person might as well bring back the Kitakami as a free ship for all. :bajan:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
719
[UFFA]
Beta Testers
3,784 posts
5,102 battles

No. Nyet. Nein. Non. Ne. Nei.

 

The last thing I want is for a cruiser with tunnel vision to detonate my magazine instead of scraping the paint.

 

It's not the cruiser 95% of the time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,150
[HINON]
Privateers
6,266 posts
3,405 battles

 

Just make it extended contact then or up the damage exponentially over time that contact is maintained. It's only enjoyable for one person might as well bring back the Kitakami as a free ship for all. :bajan:

 

I can see so many ways this could be abused heavily.

QKlQWek.jpg

Please no.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
719
[UFFA]
Beta Testers
3,784 posts
5,102 battles

 

I can see so many ways this could be abused heavily.

QKlQWek.jpg

Please no.  

 

Please yes. It's an arcade game I get it. However an arcade ship game not bumper car tanks. Encouraging moving in forward gears and maneuvering should be a thing, no? I already most everyone is against the idea of personal responsibility and accountability so this will be my last post in this thread. Cheers all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Members
1,212 posts
16,540 battles

As they are now? No.

 

If the collision damage was in any way believable? Probably still no.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,150
[HINON]
Privateers
6,266 posts
3,405 battles

 

Please yes. It's an arcade game I get it. However an arcade ship game not bumper car tanks. Encouraging moving in forward gears and maneuvering should be a thing, no? I already most everyone is against the idea of personal responsibility and accountability so this will be my last post in this thread. Cheers all.

 

Put a troll in a DD or cruiser. They keep extended contact with allied battleship. Ship with the less health sinks first. Now you have a pink battleship.

 

Or, they keep rubbing up against allied ships, robbing them of most their health. Someone snaps, shoots troll because nobody likes losing health. 

 

 

Look, I get that you think people on the internet have the personal responsibility and accountability to not do things like that. 

They really don't.

And I don't get how a change like this would be "Encouraging moving in forward gears and manoeuvring". I don't know about you, but all the collisions I've had were because I was moving forward at speed, and trying to shift rudder in one direction or another. 

Most of us don't like running into allied ships anyway. Adding something like this on top of it would just be a tad asinine.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×