Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
You need to play a total of 20 battles to post in this section.
Vinidoanker

Thank you WG for Free Bismark

27 comments in this topic

Recommended Posts

5,106
[ERN]
Alpha Tester, Alpha Tester, In AlfaTesters, Beta Testers
10,906 posts
4,896 battles

get him to a 14 point cap asap. For those trollonderys

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,999
[V_KNG]
Beta Testers
13,205 posts

After this campaign... we can no longer trust that all Bismarck drivers ground their way up the German BB line. I wonder if it will matter? Will we see Hood-style playing? OTWT ;-) 

 

Congrats - she's a fine ship. Be sure to get those skills up fast... and be sure to do the manual secondary build - it is well worth it. 

  • Cool 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,247
[SCCC]
Members
1,137 posts
9,687 battles

She's outclassed by Tirpitz anyway, so.....yeah....

 

Umm... no not really.
  • Cool 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
118
[LMNA]
Members
531 posts
6,862 battles

 

Umm... no not really.

 

Uhh, yeah she is. Tirpitz has the same guns, the same secondaries, the same armor, but she has torpedoes, which makes her deadlier, and she has a premium camo which gives her more benefits than Bismarck.

 

No matter how you slice it, Bismarck is inferior.

Edited by Zero_Kelvin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
118
[LMNA]
Members
531 posts
6,862 battles

I find Hydro generally more useful than the torps that get knocked out all the time. 

 

Never had the torpedoes tubes get taken out on my end, and Vigilance does the same thing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
729
Alpha Tester
2,162 posts
6,770 battles

 

Uhh, yeah she is. Tirpitz has the same guns, the same secondaries, the same armor, but she has torpedoes, which makes her deadlier, and she has a premium camo which gives her more benefits than Bismarck.

 

No matter how you slice it, Bismarck is inferior.

 

You forgot:

Speed

AA

Hydro

 

And the fact you can lose those torpedoes, and everybody knows to avoid you.

 

Bismarck is a superior team player and they are equal for solo play.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1,693
[FOXEH]
Alpha Tester
6,885 posts
21,773 battles

After this campaign... we can no longer trust that all Bismarck drivers ground their way up the German BB line. I wonder if it will matter? Will we see Hood-style playing? OTWT ;-) 

 

Congrats - she's a fine ship. Be sure to get those skills up fast... and be sure to do the manual secondary build - it is well worth it. 

 

agreed, though chances are most of the "BAD" players won't even beable to complete most of the missions. still, I wish WG would've made the minimum tier tier 6......:read_fish:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,640
[WOLF1]
Members
9,915 posts
18,231 battles

 

Uhh, yeah she is. Tirpitz has the same guns, the same secondaries, the same armor, but she has torpedoes, which makes her deadlier, and she has a premium camo which gives her more benefits than Bismarck.

 

No matter how you slice it, Bismarck is inferior.

I am going to go ahead and say that NO... it is not...but coming from you we are not surprised...

 

and BTW you are 44%  in your TIRP and 48% in the Biz....

so yeah, your credible opinion is the only thing that is inferior it would seem

Edited by pmgaudio

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
118
[LMNA]
Members
531 posts
6,862 battles

I am going to go ahead and say that NO... it is not...but coming from you we are not surprised...

 

and BTW you are 44%  in your TIRP and 48% in the Biz....

so yeah, your credible opinion is the only thing that is inferior it would seem

 

I like how you bring up my win rate in an argument that has nothing to do with it, which just tells me you have no argument.

 

 

 

You forgot:

Speed

AA

Hydro

 

 

Speed is meaningless to a battleship.

AA is meaningless because carriers are extinct

and again, Vigilance does the same thing.

Edited by Zero_Kelvin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,640
[WOLF1]
Members
9,915 posts
18,231 battles

 

I like how you bring up my win rate in an argument that has nothing to do with it, which just tells me you have no argument.

 

 

 

Speed is meaningless to a battleship.

AA is meaningless because carriers are extinct

and again, Vigilance does the same thing.

ok, wait....

How is doing better in a ship you say is OUTCLASSED by another ship you do WORSE in NOT a valid argument exactly???

You really are a piece of work aren't you>?>

Another to add to the ignore list due to lack of clues here...

Seriously dude. GET YOUR FACTS CLEAR BEFORE YOU ARGUE AN INVALID POINT...G.F.W

 

oh anb BTW Vigilance is NOT THE SAME AS HYDRO...man you have to start learning things here

Edited by pmgaudio

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
118
[LMNA]
Members
531 posts
6,862 battles

GET YOUR FACTS CLEAR BEFORE YOU ARGUE AN INVALID POINT

 

You still haven't given a good reason why my point is invalid, other than bringing up irrelevant information for it's own sake. Why do you keep talking about my performance when I don't talk about my performance? My personal performance has no bearing on how a vessel performs across the board.

 

 

Edited by Zero_Kelvin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,640
[WOLF1]
Members
9,915 posts
18,231 battles

 

You still haven't given a good reason why my point is invalid, other than bringing up irrelevant information for it's own sake. Why do you keep talking about my performance when I don't talk about my performance? My personal performance has no bearing on how a vessel performs across the board.

 

then look for yourself 

You argue like a child and have ZERO validity to anything you ever say...

Gee [edited]Wizz kid..

https://na.warships.today/vehicles

 

 

RuHvOkk.png

Edited by pmgaudio

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
118
[LMNA]
Members
531 posts
6,862 battles

 

then look for yourself 

You argue like a child and have ZERO validity to anything you ever say...

Gee [edited]Wizz kid..

https://na.warships.today/vehicles

 

Well thanks for supporting my argument.

 

I don't see Bismarck at the top of the list, so that shows she's outclassed not just by Tirpitz, but even by the TIER 4 Nikolai of all things.

 

That's just pitiful.

Edited by Zero_Kelvin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,640
[WOLF1]
Members
9,915 posts
18,231 battles

 

Well thanks for supporting my argument.

 

I don't see Bismarck at the top of the list, so that shows she's outclassed not just by Tirpitz, but even by the TIER 4 Nikolai of all things.

 

That's just pitiful.

 

you really dont pay attention to anything do you....

Biz numbers are all better than Tirp... maybe put your glasses on and see that chart up there again....you really are making yourself look.... well silly really..\

\o/

 

and the tirp has been in the game almost twice as long as the Biz and still cannot catch her numbers...

Man you are just all kinds of_______

Edited by pmgaudio

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
118
[LMNA]
Members
531 posts
6,862 battles

 

you really dont pay attention to anything do you....

Biz numbers are all better than Tirp... maybe put your glasses on and see that chart up there again....you really are making yourself look.... well silly really..

 

Forget Tirpitz, I'm laughing about how Bismarck is obsolete compared to a battleship 4 tiers below her. That's even worse for Bismarck.

 

Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. :)

Edited by Zero_Kelvin

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3,640
[WOLF1]
Members
9,915 posts
18,231 battles

 

Forget Tirpitz, I'm laughing about how Bismarck is obsolete compared to a battleship 4 tiers below her. That's even worse for Bismarck.

 

Thanks for pointing me in the right direction. :)

 

you just dont seem to want to ever admit you are wrong.... done bro, you are gone AND forgotten.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
26
[PRU]
Members
120 posts
4,787 battles

Ummm, Zero. The next time Vigilance can see a ship in a smoke cloud will be the first time.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
873
[SCCC]
Members
3,181 posts
17,491 battles

 

you just dont seem to want to ever admit you are wrong.... done bro, you are gone AND forgotten.

 

Zero_Kelvin is a troll, don't feed him.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×