TheDreadnought

The solution to forum whining --

  • You need to play a total of 10 battles to post in this section.

75 posts in this topic

Super effective at what?  LOL

 

If I understand your presentation, 6.3 caused destroyer representation to increase from 26.6% to 27%?  Not only is that an insignificant change. . .  I don't even seen the point you're trying to make.  So "Super Effective?"  We're going to have to label that as Fake News.

 

My point being that Destroyers are far from being in a good shape. Look at the differences between Destroyers and Battleships.

 

You claim that DD mains cry without a reason on this Forum, but you can't see that they are the least played ship class (again ignoring CVs) by far? There were more Nerfs to DDs than 0.6.3, I could name a handful of them. And look at where DDs are now and tell me into the face that they are fine.


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The words of a cruiser main hold twice the value of everyone else. CVs get monthly free food coupons. Gotta feed all those pilots. 


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Right, DDs are in a good shape. That's why they are the least played ship type when we ignore CVs... by far...

 

 

 

Why is it okay to ignore CV's? 1/4 of the game just gets a pass so that DD's can be considered worst? And CA's are in a much worse place the DD's.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

my stat says I'm cruiser main, but I identify myself as a DD player.

 

Did you just assume my role in this game?


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why is it okay to ignore CV's? 1/4 of the game just gets a pass so that DD's can be considered worst? And CA's are in a much worse place the DD's.

 

Ok. First off. When talking populations, you can't talk CV because they are limited in MM. As far as the 3 "surface combat" ships go, Destroyer is 3rd and by a fair margin. And when you claim CA is in a "much worse" place what exactly are you quantifying here? Population wise CA is #1 in low tiers, #2 in high tiers plays. What exactly is it that is wrong with cruisers? They currently have better average Win Rate, XP, Damage, K:D ratio, survival, planes shot down, and ship kills than Destroyer does and this is "much worse"? Wow.

 

Here are the numbers from the past week of North American Warships: (like REAL numbers, not "I hear" or "I think")

Edit: 1 = Tiers 10,9,8  

       2= Tiers 7,6,5,4,3,2,1

Player Average for Shipclasses [ at 2017/04/15 ]

div name class players total battles average of rates
battles win draw lose exp damage
caused
warship
destroyed
aircraft
destoryed
base
capture
base
defense
survived kill /
death
agro
damage
spot
damage
1 BB Higher Tier 11289 297004 26.31 50.03 0.02 49.95 1215 54987 0.79 1.75 0.00 0.00 35.51 1.22 1200981 19150
1 CA Higher Tier 10036 265103 26.42 50.33 0.01 49.65 1223 42326 0.71 1.22 0.00 0.00 30.80 1.03 764054 15888
1 CV Higher Tier 937 22858 24.39 50.11 0.03 49.86 1218 57301 0.96 16.06 0.00 0.00 66.92 2.90 222510 48174
1 DD Higher Tier 7367 199580 27.09 50.22 0.01 49.77 1208 33573 0.70 0.31 0.00 0.00 29.44 0.99 506059 21452
2 BB Lower Tier 10815 264960 24.50 49.92 0.02 50.06 745 31913 0.73 0.78 0.00 0.00 37.89 1.18 669013 7907
2 CA Lower Tier 14806 379440 25.63 49.74 0.02 50.24 684 20479 0.61 0.46 0.00 0.00 22.74 0.79 440418 7233
2 CV Lower Tier 1937 48171 24.87 50.24 0.02 49.74 779 32018 0.68 10.51 0.00 0.00 53.33 1.46 162175 20532
2 DD Lower Tier 8496 215138 25.32 49.80 0.01 50.19 705 19105 0.68 0.13 0.00 0.00 21.68 0.87 318816 8749
 
Edited by Canadatron

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

...the the role of the Destroyer was to protect the larger Warships of the fleet and if needed it would take on suicidal missions if the need arise to go on 1 way trip to enemy and attack....

 

Ironically, this is how I usually play my DD. I will, of course, do a scouting run at the beginning of the match, but after the first few minutes, I usually play close-in support for my BBs. If I see a red BB yolo-ing, I might do a suicide rush. Naturally, it all depends on how the match unfolds. If I get caught in my scouting run, for instance, this general plan goes straight out the porthole.

 

But, there are as many different ways to play as there are players. To each their own.


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If yea whine , complain , cry or whatever , ive got the absolute perfect solution , if im not interested ...I DO NOT READ !!!

That is all


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why is it okay to ignore CV's? 1/4 of the game just gets a pass so that DD's can be considered worst? And CA's are in a much worse place the DD's.

 

Because CV numbers are artificially capped at 1-2 per team depending on the tier.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey, destroyer mains don't seem too bad.

 

For the most part its true, they just have a minority of very outspoken people who give me the impression that the only thing they see is fair would be every other non dd ship to be torpedo fodder.

 

As someone that plays almost all nations and classes I just dont see the point of joining one group completely and see myself as kind of an outsider in these class wars on the forum. 


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Because CV numbers are artificially capped at 1-2 per team depending on the tier.

 

So what? You can't discount them, the sad state they are in, the horrible balance between and around them, and the fact even hardcore CV fans know they are a huge mess. DD's are *not* the worst class in the game. They are solidly second, behind BB's. They just *aren't* BB's, and as such, there's something about, "losing the girl," that comes to mind.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Why is it okay to ignore CV's? 1/4 of the game just gets a pass so that DD's can be considered worst? And CA's are in a much worse place the DD's.

 

Because they never exceed the 5% mark on any Tier. I am speaking of the common classes, sure they exist, but CVs are a class for themselves.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Lets get rid of destroyers, cruisers, carriers and Battleships.  That just leaves SUBS!!!!  Re-name the site World of WarSubs. (WoWS is still applicable)

 

:popcorn:


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

. They are solidly second, behind BB's. 

 

Population wise, you are wrong sir. Confirmation bias is a helluva thing.


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

So what? You can't discount them, the sad state they are in, the horrible balance between and around them, and the fact even hardcore CV fans know they are a huge mess. DD's are *not* the worst class in the game. They are solidly second, behind BB's. They just *aren't* BB's, and as such, there's something about, "losing the girl," that comes to mind.

 

Because the cap guarantees that CV will always be the least played class. Think about it every game that has one CV also has 4-5 BB/DD/CA each.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

I see more BB's in matches than I see DD's.

 

This.

 

BBs routinely outnumber every other ship class in matches now.  Roughly half of the team consists of BBs, with the remaining slots occupied by cruisers, destroyers, and the odd carrier or two.

Edited by Kuckoo

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Because the cap guarantees that CV will always be the least played class. Think about it every game that has one CV also has 4-5 BB/DD/CA each.

 

Sometimes even more of one class. My personal record is nine Battleships on one team, and no it was not during one of the BB flooding times like when the KM line came out.

0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why would BB mains complain when the class is enjoying a nerf immunity for the last 6 months or so?

 

If you want to know how BB players react to nerfs just type "bow armor "nerf"" on the search engine and enjoy the tears.

 


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Or when cruiser citadels were bugged and could not be hit underwater.


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'll just leave this here...

 

-snip-

 

Wow... That is more than what I have to offer...

 ZJxOfQj.jpg

 


0

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.